- Related Stories
-
HP technology aims to capture true 'Shrek' green
March 8, 2007 -
LG to sell first Blu-ray/HD DVD combo player
January 7, 2007 -
A shotgun marriage for Blu-ray and HD DVD?
January 5, 2007 -
Blu-ray vs. HD DVD: Knocking each other out?
November 22, 2006 -
Microsoft shows off HD DVD drive for Xbox
August 7, 2006 -
Blu-ray, HD DVD players: Clunky, unimpressive
January 9, 2006 -
FAQ: HD DVD vs. Blu-ray
October 1, 2005 -
Disney to support Blu-ray Disc
December 8, 2004 -
Sony's PS3 to use Blu-ray Disc
August 5, 2004 -
Latest Potter book scanned, swapped
June 25, 2003 - Related Blogs
-
Cheap HD DVD player coming--format war rages on
August 29, 2007 -
Paramount and DreamWorks give HD DVD a boost
August 20, 2007 -
Blu-ray v. HD DVD: Where do we stand?
July 26, 2007 -
Samsung prices combo Blu-ray/HD DVD player at $1,050
July 25, 2007 -
Enough with the HD DVD, Blu-ray battle. Bring on downloads!
July 18, 2007 -
'Transformers' provoke unexpected variety of rapture
July 6, 2007 -
Why the Blu-ray HD-DVD combo player is stuck in neutral
June 19, 2007 -
HP to debut Blu-ray HD DVD combo drive
May 7, 2007
With Paramount, DreamWorks joining HD DVD camp, will the format pull ahead of Blu-ray Disc? It's too early to tell, analysts say.
The story "Division over next-generation DVDs deepening" published September 4, 2007 at 6:58 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.




Again, I expect Hollywood will try and market this as a new experience (not at all, just a slightly better pq) with "bonus material" (who watches that crap on regular dvd's anyway?).
So that implies that 7 of the films were exclusively on Blu-Ray, and an undisclosed number of the 8 were on both. Talk about working hard to give an HD-DVD slant to fit the story premise. I realize it's a Reuters piece, not CNet, but the real story is that the situation is so muddled that most consumers aren't that interested in buying into either format at the higher prices. I'm mildly pulling for Blu-Ray, but DVD is still good enough for me.
I am still in the process of replacing my 700plus VHS movies to DVD, and I am sure I will be dead and gone prior to even considering a -High-Def- conversion... and, of course, by then I couldn't tell the diff anyway!
By & large...started doing the same thing several years ago...till I got a fast enough PC & TV Tuner card. With this combo...along with Xvid/Divx...not even going the route of DVD. Rain on the HD garbage...since the studios missed out on doing what is really happening out in the world. Blu-Ray/HD-DVD is not it...but Xvid/Divx/H.264 is all ready there & being used much more than these boondoggles from Hollywood.
Control is a nice concept when you're being left in the mud.
Both camps hand a chance to make a single unified format that would have been adopted when the tried to work together to combine HD DVD and Blue-Ray. If they couldn't be bothered making it easier for consumers to choose and make it a whole lot less likely that we will end up flushing hundreds of dollars down the drain on the wrong format then why should be bother.
They need to pull their heads of the dark place the sun don't shine and look around. We are not cattle and we are not lemmings and I am not jumping off not f'ing cliffs just to line their greedy stupid pockets.
Apparently they didn't learn from Beta vs. VHS or Divx vs. DVD.
Robert
- 720p, 1080i, 1080p HD WMV on DL DVD
-
by SpiritMatter
September 4, 2007 10:25 PM PDT
- You can take any captured video, HDV, ATSC or 1080p.xxx, edit and render it to HD WMV at 1080p or less res to a dual layer 8.5GB DVD. Enjoy!
-
Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)