- Related Stories
-
Microsoft changes Vista over antitrust concerns
October 13, 2006 -
Vista's European battleground
September 18, 2006 -
Antitrust angst for Microsoft
July 12, 2006 -
'No alternative' to Microsoft fine
July 12, 2006 -
EU voices concerns over Microsoft's Vista
March 29, 2006
On Friday, Microsoft said it will allow security software makers to access the kernel of 64-bit versions of Vista for security-monitoring purposes. The company will also make it possible for security companies to disable certain parts of the Windows Security Center in Vista when a third-party security console is installed. Microsoft said it had decided to take these actions to try to allay Commission antitrust concerns, and also vowed to ship Vista in Europe at the same time as the rest of the world.
In response, the Commission issued a statement Friday warning that Microsoft's actions didn't mean Vista would not infringe European laws.
"The Commission has not given a 'green light' to Microsoft to deliver Vista because," the Commission said, "as the Commission has consistently stated, Microsoft must shoulder its own responsibilities to ensure that Vista is fully compliant with EC Treaty competition rules and in particular with the principles laid down in the March 2004 Commission antitrust decision concerning Microsoft (XP)."
Still, several members of the European Parliament welcomed the EC's apparent restraint. In a joint statement, Chris Heaton-Harris, Peter Skinner and Sharon Bowles--U.K. members in the European Parliament--said that EC concerns could have delayed the release of Vista in Europe, to the detriment of small businesses.
"It was our understanding from what contact we've had with them that the EC were going to stop the launch of Vista," a representative for Bowles said. "The statement by the EC (on Friday) wasn't prohibitive."
Small and midsize businesses in Europe have expressed concerns that their businesses could be hurt if Vista were further delayed, the representative added.
Heaton-Harris met with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer at the company's campus in Seattle in August, after which he criticized the Commission's decision to fine Microsoft for antitrust violations in 2004. "I really can't understand the Commission's position. It is as if they objected to Ford supplying cars with tires since this reduces the market for retrofitted tires," Heaton-Harris said.
In 2004, the Commission found that Microsoft had breached anticompetition laws and ordered the company to disclose server interoperability details and cease bundling Windows Media Player with XP.
Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.
See more CNET content tagged:
commission, antitrust, Europe, Microsoft Windows Vista, Microsoft Corp.



How about Microsoft with its "deep" pockets chartering a few "CONCORDE (not AIRBUS 380) FLIGHTS" to the Caribbean for Chris Heaton-Harris, Peter Skinner and Sharon Bowles--U.K. members in the European Parliament and interested members of the EU Commission to see WORLD CUP CRICKET 2007 and include a "video-camera crew" so that the matches can be "streamed" to the rest of world. That would not hurt Microsoft pockets and the issues would be settled, wouldn't they!
Microsoft needs new management - or a new owner -or I need a new OS!
What is the definition of a new machine? Right now almost any small changes invokes violation with WGA and hardware checker.
- Anti trust sounds like another word for tax
- by rorybaust October 19, 2006 11:34 PM PDT
- I object when governments deem that because a company is willing to provide all the bells and whistles in one package that that is anti competitive and tax them and hold all of Europe to ransom on threats that are neither clear nor logical. I the consumer can make up my own mind if I want a media player from Microsoft or a **** poor Real Player that wants me to subscribe to get the features that are free with the MS media player
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)I understand that not everybody likes all that Microsoft offers and even I am starting to get annoyed with some Microsoft products myself, however I have the choice to change or use other products like I have with Thunderbird and Fire Fox, can't Europeans make their own decisions or do they need an ideological government to line the pockets of the non competitive companies that see this as a way to push their products upon us.
Also I fail to understand how Apples behavior with ITUNES and the IPOD is also not anti competitive, but I suppose in a world run by politicians we really do get what we deserve.