May 11, 2006 4:00 AM PDT

Despite controversy, 'booth babes' still prowl E3

(continued from previous page)

In 2005, the Nyko models were on the floor in very short wraparound skirts and form-fitting tops that ended just below their breasts. This year, the Nyko models are showing just as much leg, but they're wearing regular white shorts, and T-shirts that entirely cover their midsections.

Corben said Nyko and other game companies were told that violations of the dress code would subject offending publishers to $5,000 fines. But she scoffed at the notion that such penalties would be a problem for those receiving them, especially because some companies spent six figures on their booths and as much as $50,000 on the signs for those booths alone.

Booth babe programs are "a lot more cost-effective, and I think publishers recognize that," said Corben. "Your (return on investment) is infinitely greater...I think a lot of people think the whole (policy) stunt was a joke."

Indeed, on the show floor, men were still lining up to take pictures of booth babes, just as in years past. And while the women's outfits may be showing a little bit less skin, there doesn't seem to be any sense that the women are selling sex any less.

"Honestly, this is exactly what I'm here for," Channa DeSilva, a Los Angeles game tester, said of the booth babes. "I would not be able to do this conference without pretty females to talk to."

DeSilva, who stood in line for about 10 minutes to have his picture taken with four women posing at publisher Tecmo's booth, laughed at the idea that booth babes were any less in evidence this year. And without prompting, he quickly pulled out his digital camera to show off a series of pictures of nothing but the dressed-down young women.

'People wear less at the beach'
To some of the women at the center of the controversy, the ESA's policy may well be much ado about nothing.

"I just think it's silly," said Lana Kinnear, a fourth-year E3 model working this time around for Sapphire Technology. "All the body parts were covered. People wear less at the beach."

Further, said Kinnear, who was wearing a skintight full-body suit, the booth babes are only real-life representations of the game characters they're supposed to be invoking.

"The video games (all) have half-naked people in them," she said.

Stephanie Arellano, a second-year model working for Vivendi Games and promoting its "Free Style" street basketball game, agreed.

"What we're wearing is reflective of the games," said Arellano. "Last year, I was dressed as (Lara Croft from "Tomb Raider"), with the boobs and everything."

But Arellano said she was happy that E3 is trying to crack down on the more extreme side of the booth babe spectrum.

"I think it's great that they're cutting down on the nudity part of it," she said. "Last year a lot of the women were practically nude. This year, it's being a (character from) the game, so you don't have to be nude. It's more clothing. It's more classy."

That said, Arellano doesn't think the ESA's enforcement policy has changed things all that dramatically. And she explained the publishers have an incentive to keep on bringing the underdressed women to E3.

"I don't think it's changed to the other end of the spectrum," Arellano said. "It's just calmed down. Like anything, sex sells. It's kind of like, we're never going to be covered up like a nun. They want sexy, (just) not raunchy."

CNET News.com's Ina Fried contributed to this report.

Previous page
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
booth, game company, Los Angeles, trade show, Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.

6 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
AAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!
SAN ANDRES WAS NEVER RATED FOR CHILDREN!!! IT WAS ALWAYS RATED M!!! GET IT RIGHT!!!
Posted by NickSentowski (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Sex makes 17-year olds go blind
Come now, the GTA series is indeed rated 'M' for Mature Audience, meaning only those 17 or older can buy it. BUT, with the "Hot Coffee" hack the game would have to be rated Adults Only, meaning only those 18 or older could buy it.

So really the big worry here is for all those 17-year olds, and as I'm sure we all know, 17 year olds will go blind if they see some poorly pixelated, obviously faked, humorous representation of sex. I mean, those 12 months between turning 17 and turning 18 are going to make some huge world of difference when it comes to a persons ability to handle cartoon sex!

Ohh, if anyone's worried though, the original M 17+ rating did state "Strong Sexual Content" (along with "Blood and Gore, Intense Violence and Drug Use") even without that "Hot Coffee" mod.
Posted by Hoser McMoose (182 comments )
Link Flag
If It Wasn't...
If it wasn't San Andres, it was going to be some other game that would have started it all.
*sigh*
Posted by troppp (58 comments )
Link Flag
Much ado over nothing
Since when does a cheesy sex scene buried in a game (that has to be unlocked with a hack) have anything to do with the attire of booth babes? "Cover the kid's eyes - there's a naked navel on parade!" What a load of crap....
Posted by Get_Bent (534 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Whats this world coming to?
"...She said another of the models received a warning from show organizers for showing too much skin. "Apparently her cleavage was a little too distracting," she said...."

Isnt that the POINT of a booth babe?

And this is happening in LA. Thats the last place you'd expect.
Posted by (402 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Liberals Everywhere
The Liberals are trying to ruin the show. Next the perverts will be using 14 year olds to promote their stuff.
Posted by GrandpaN1947 (187 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.