August 10, 2005 4:00 AM PDT

Database start-ups bet on open source

Related Stories

Open season at Linux show

August 11, 2005

Database vendors eye open-source effect

July 13, 2005

Open-source database gets backing

January 10, 2005
Following the gradual acceptance of Linux, open-source databases are moving into corporate data centers as an increasingly viable option.

Databases have been available with an open-source license for many years. But the past few months have seen a growing number of partnerships and products aimed at maturing the industry of add-ons and support services--vital to winning over corporate customers.

At the LinuxWorld conference this week in San Francisco, MySQL signed partners Novell and Dell to resell the upstart company's database and support service, making the product easier to procure. MySQL is also readying a release of its namesake database with features including stored procedures and distributed transactions, which large corporations often use.

Special coverage
LinuxWorld SF
Open-source hopefuls join Linux stalwarts to talk shop and hawk wares at the San Francisco show.

In the past few months, a handful of companies--Pervasive Software, Greenplum and EnterpriseDB--have sought to build businesses around the PostgreSQL open-source database, which has been around for about 20 years and is considered very mature. One of those upstarts, EnterpriseDB released on Tuesday its first product, detailed its pricing plans and said it intends to raise its first round of venture funding later this month.

Last week, three companies joined to create a package of open-source database-related products for business intelligence applications. And the Apache Derby database last week shipped its first version and gained Sun Microsystems as a distributor.

The growing number of technology companies betting their businesses on open-source database products reflects a gradual shift in corporate spending patterns, according to analysts and industry executives. With many companies familiar with Linux, the Apache Web server and open-source development tools, databases are an obvious next step.

"Customers are paying a lot of money for an Oracle or IBM or Microsoft database license, and they are very cost-conscious. To some extent the database is a commoditized layer, and they're asking themselves 'Why are we paying money for a commoditized layer?'" said Michael Goulde, an analyst at Forrester Research.

A Forrester survey found that more than two-thirds of corporate customers are using open-source products in some way. The research company estimates that spending on open-source databases was about $120 million last year.

Often, developers bring in an open-source product for a single project and then the usage spreads. Indeed, open-source databases are still a small sliver of the overall relational database industry estimated at nearly $15 billion last year, according to IDC.

Different tacks
Still, usage of these alternatives to entrenched database providers appears to be growing. MySQL boasts having 6 million installations, along with 1,500 MySQL-related open-source projects at SourceForge and a growing network of partners, which help distribute the company's product and services.

Large corporate customers, such as Sabre Holdings and, have built their back-end systems around large farms of relatively cheap hardware servers running MySQL.

MySQL's distribution partnerships with Novell and Dell will broaden its

Page 1 | 2 | 3


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Maybe databases are a good example of co-existence of open and closed source software. The majority of organizations might be using FOSS products but there will be plenty of space in the high-end/innovation space for commercial/closed product. Tim Delhaes - <a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>
Posted by edbong (15 comments )
Reply Link Flag
SQLite: an open source database for PHP
The article on open source databases mentions:
Other open-source databases available include Sleepycat, Firebird and Derby.

I'd like to add that there is another one called SQLite (see <a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a> and <a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a> ). This database, claiming speeds comparable to mySQL, now ships embedded with PHP for Windows, and the significance is that SQLite is a personal database only available to the local user (that is, it is not available to an internet user), where PHP is considered a local user. This means that it is less exposed (more secure) and there is not the overhead associated with it acting as a server. In addition, each database is contained within a single file so individual databases can be trivially relocated even to other machines. While not as robust as mySQL, from my point of view the chief benefit is that it increases portability and reduces overhead for the developer.

Csaba Gabor from Vienna
Posted by (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Open-source market
For sure, open-source will always have its share of the market. They'll grow, fall and stabilize in the same economic behavior as the proprietary counterparts. The success is not dependent on the open-source movement. Rather, the success depends on the quality and acceptance of the products themselves.
Posted by Mendz (519 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.