March 22, 2005 3:37 PM PST
'DVD Jon' reopens iTunes backdoor
- Related Stories
-
Motorola coy with iTunes phone
March 16, 2005 -
Hacker takes bite out of Apple's iTunes
August 12, 2004 -
Apple disables iTunes song-swapping tool
April 28, 2004 -
Program points way to iTunes DRM hack
November 24, 2003
The release comes just a day after Apple blocked a previous version of the program, called PyMusique, in part by requiring all iTunes customers to use the latest version of Apple's software.
In a blog posting, Norwegian programmer Jon Johansen, who was previously responsible for releasing software used to copy DVDs online, said he had been successful at reverse engineering the latest iTunes encryption.
Cody Brocious, a Pennsylvania high school student working with Johansen, said they saw the project as "necessary for the Linux community," despite Apple's opposition.
The programmers' work has been one of the most persistent projects targeting Apple, whose iPod and iTunes Music Store have drawn consistent attacks and experiments by people eager to extend the capability of the products, or simply disarm copy protection.
The cat-and-mouse response is a familiar one in the technology world, as programmers have often sought to write software compatible with larger or more popular applications. Instant messaging companies such as America Online, Yahoo, Microsoft and Trillian have long feuded, blocking and reopening access to each other's software.
The PyMusique programmers say they are primarily interested in allowing people using Linux computers to purchase music from the iTunes store, explaining their goals in a blog posting online. Their software requires users to have an iTunes account and pay the ordinary price for music.
They say they weren't aiming at creating a tool for stripping iTunes copy-protection off songs. However, Apple's system adds the layer of copy-protection inside the iTunes software itself, and so they didn't need to add it in their own version, they said.
Apple's software already allows customers to create an unprotected version of a song, by burning an iTunes purchase to a CD. That file can be ripped into an ordinary MP3.
While Apple has made no public legal threats against the programmers, the iTunes terms of service bars the use of any unauthorized software to access the store. Copyright lawyers have previously said that the PyMusique system, which evades Apple's intention to wrap all purchases in copy protection, may well cross legal lines.
"The work I do is completely legal in my country," Johansen said in an e-mail interview. "Of course, I know very well that not doing anything illegal doesn't mean you won't be prosecuted (or) sued."
Johansen was prosecuted in Norway for releasing the DeCSS code in 1999, but was ultimately cleared of charges.
An Apple representative could not immediately be reached for comment.
Brocious said the updated version of PyMusique would only be available for Linux, and that the programmers would not make a Windows version this time.





difficult for others to gain a greater number of artists to these
stores.
They are messing with my past-time and millions of others
worldwide. Who the hell do they think they are?!
Fine, now a new method of encryption will be developed. Did
these IDIOTS actually think that their self grandizing acts would
result in non-encrypted data transfers?! Just how stupid is that
thought. Obviously they are smart enough to realize that would
never happen anyway. So the real point of this crap? ...
previously voiced (and i believe quite accurately) as selfish acts.
Put these putzs in the clink
I think apple needs to produce a linux version. I am trying to move to linux, but things like this are holding me back.
Albums were the music currency unit in the past. P2P software and iTunes can take credit for introducing individual songs as a preferred music currency unit (as illegal and legal alternatives respectively). Now, it appears that even individual songs will not do. Napster has an all-you-can-eat monthly subscription for less than the price of a brand new CD. Who will want to purchase songs for $0.99 when you can have it all for less than a CD worth?
Songs have become a commodity, so something else (better) has to emerge as a differentiating factor in order to keep the music industry profitable (Apple does not make a cent of profit from iTunes sales, only iPod sales are profitable). We will witness dramatic changes to the way we purchase and listen to music in the near future. Stay tuned.
For a journalist writing for C|Net News.com, this writer does not seem very clueful.
FYI - DVDs could *always* be copied (unlike VCDs, DVDs do not use any special disk format). Jon didn't contribute any code that let people copy something they couldn't copy before.
What he *actually* did was write code that let people on non-Windows operating systems view the DVDs they had actually paid for.
Quite a difference, eh?
Shame on you, John Borland. Go stand in a corner.
loopholes and design flaws.
What you see in reality is design flaw.. if it is a software bug, it
can be immediately corrected. What you see here is a design
flaw. The fact that Apple is sending an non-DRM file to the
end-user and then encrypting it with the DRM on the user
computer is flawed. It is a design flaw.
When is it a security issue. If the same piece of code can
automatically transfer itself to other computers and change the
itunes default so that songs are not encrypted, then it is a
security issue.
If you notice, all the problems that windows viruses (virii?) are
exploiting today are nothing but design flaws of Windows!
Unfortunately, design flaws are not that easy to correct. You
provide patches, but those are temporary fixes.
What will happen with iTunes is that Apple will release 4.7.2
versrion in the next week or so; which will completely change
the way in which Music is transferred. iTMS will then require
4.7.2 or higher to download music.
-----------------------------------------------------
Visit my site: http://www.nuclearfootball.com
There is no such thing as perfectly secure music, that is a fantasy. But the music industry doesn't need that, all they need is a "good enough" protection system. That is how it has always been.
DVD Jon is not doing anything illegal. He is not making is possible to do anything that couldn't be done before. (You could previously burn an itunes song to a CD, then rip the CD to an mp3.)
Furthermore, you can just go buy the physical CD and rip it to unprotected mp3, for about the same cost.
Finally, when someone temporarily hacks iTunes, it won't make the music industry retreat from iTunes. They have no choice but to participate, they know they are too late to the game as it is.
re your later post: Time for you to go back and compensate the artists whose work you stole via napster. You need to buy copies of all those tracks from iTunes, and delete your old mp3s.
- Hack a new name while you're at it-
-
by Fashion Technologist
October 26, 2006 12:11 PM PDT
- 'DVD Jon' should hack a new name... like:
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
See all 49 Comments >>The Cracker Hacker
or howabout
iHack
or
DVD Jon PartII