ASPEN, Colo.--Executives at broadband providers said on Monday that there's no need for the federal government to ensure that companies treat all Internet sites equally.
"Are we going to dream up all the problems that might happen and regulate in advance of that or are we going to see if the problem does arise?" Peter Davidson, a senior vice president at Verizon Communications, said at a conference here. "You can quickly do something that addresses a problem that's real."
Tech firms such as Amazon.com and Apple Computer have been warning for years that some broadband companies might ink marketing deals and block certain Web sites or favor some Internet destinations over others. Because Yahoo and SBC have an alliance to sell DSL connections, for instance, SBC could theoretically choose to favor Yahoo.com over Google.com--though that has never happened.
But a handful of liberal advocacy groups and VoIP providers have been calling for preventive rules, saying that waiting until a widespread problem exists would be too late. Such formal regulations could come from Congress or the FCC.
Three U.S. broadband providers have blocked Vonage calls, according to a Vonage representative. In the latest case, a mid-Western operator charges customers $10 a month extra if they use Vonage, the representative said. Otherwise, the Vonage service doesn't work.
"A customer has to have the access to a certain baseline of service," Jeffrey Citron, chairman and chief executive of Vonage, said at a Progress and Freedom Foundation conference here. The government should enforce a "broadband bill of rights" including a minimum service level, the ability to connect to any lawful Web site and the ability to connect any device to the Internet, Citron said.
Otherwise, Citron predicted, companies will "block application providers that provide other services on top" of a broadband connection.
Representatives of both DSL and cable modem providers disagreed.
"It's not a problem. I don't know how many ways to say it," said Kyle McSlarrow, president of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association. "If you're going to write down the rules and make them mandatory, you're going to hand over a lot of wealth creation to lawyers...We should be very careful before stepping into this space--we should not panic."
Cable companies have long pledged their commitment to the "net neutrality" concept. As long ago as February 2003, the NCTA wrote to federal regulators and promised not to block access to Web sites.
Forrest Miller, president of SBC Communications, also urged a laissez-faire approach. "You have a somewhat self-policing market mechanism built-in," he said.
On Aug. 5, the FCC adopted a "policy statement"--an informal set of guidelines, not a formal regulation--that said broadband providers should follow "net neutrality" guidelines.
Any ISP's primary incentive is to please their customers. If they limit their customers' abilities, they will lose customers, this much is clear. (And the landscape will only grow more competitive over time...)
The danger of such proposed laws is that they amount to government-managed speech. Requiring a bookstore to stock every book might be called "fair speech" but it's certainly not free.
Ditto the ISP's. They have the First Amendment choice as to what goes over their wires, just as a bookstore can choose what it stocks.
The ISPs would be fools, of course, to limit sites for their customers, and they show no signs of doing so. Let's address problems that exist, instead of imagined conspiracies.
Telus blocked a website set up by their striking / locked out enmployees, Rogesr and Sympatico are talking about providing priority to their own VOIP service. Slimebuckets
I haven't found a corporation yet that could outsmart me on consumer technology. If your ISP is favoring one site over another, then change the DNS server to someone else. You can also use a free program like Treewalk* to cache your DNS and spread it over a series of alternate DNS servers.
If your VoIP service is being disrupted by your ISP, then try changing the service port in the program's software config. Services like Skype will let you run over port 80, which your ISP cannot block.
Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon--all are targets for Mozilla's plan to use Web apps to free people from ecosystem lock-in. Also: new Firefox features aplenty.
The rise of Apple's stores is one of the past decade's great retail stories. So, why then does the company continue to creep back into the big-box outlets and will this hurt the brand?
The company helps small businesses with little tech savvy build apps easily, and now its partner Constant Contact will email-blast prospective users, too.
The Samsung Galaxy Mini 2 S6500 could make its debut at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona later this month, according to a leaked promotional image.
Web giant is spending $120 million to beef up its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, according to filings with the city reviewed by the San Jose Mercury News.
The danger of such proposed laws is that they amount to government-managed speech. Requiring a bookstore to stock every book might be called "fair speech" but it's certainly not free.
Ditto the ISP's. They have the First Amendment choice as to what goes over their wires, just as a bookstore can choose what it stocks.
The ISPs would be fools, of course, to limit sites for their customers, and they show no signs of doing so. Let's address problems that exist, instead of imagined conspiracies.
If your VoIP service is being disrupted by your ISP, then try changing the service port in the program's software config. Services like Skype will let you run over port 80, which your ISP cannot block.
* <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.ntcanuck.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.ntcanuck.com</a>