- Related Stories
-
Digital kids: Growing up wired
November 15, 2007 -
Fair use is not a consumer right
September 6, 2007 -
Separating fact from fiction on digital copyrights
August 27, 2007 -
MTV and RealNetworks: A sound decision?
August 21, 2007 -
Hey Eminem, blame the system, not Apple
August 17, 2007 -
Ad-supported SpiralFrog finally launches music site
August 7, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
European regulators on the rampage? Maybe not
September 20, 2007
Jesper Johansson--a former senior program manager for security policy at Microsoft who moved to Amazon in September last year--wrote in his blog on Monday that he may drop Windows Media Center for LinuxMCE, a free open-source add-on to the Kubuntu desktop operating system, because problems caused by Microsoft's digital-rights management (DRM) software have proven so difficult to fix.
After Johansson's 5-year-old child complained that cable network Comcast's On Demand video system was not working with Windows Media Center, Johansson wrote, he attempted to resolve the problem.
"Upon inspecting the problem I found that the video would turn on, the screen would flicker for a second each of black and the video a few times, and then the Blue Screen of DRM came up. It also wouldn't play any premium channels," he wrote.
Johansson said the recommended work-around involved several convoluted steps, including installing Windows Media Player 10, which crashed, and then being advised to troubleshoot the problem with Windows SharePoint Services. A subsequent Microsoft DRM update then caused the Internet Explorer browser to crash.
Johansson said that DRM software is not only ineffective, but a waste of money that is damaging businesses attempting to use it to control the way consumers use copyright material.
"How many billions has the industry spent on DRM schemes that the bad guys break in weeks? How many perfectly legitimate users has the industry annoyed and driven away? How many lost DVD sales has it caused? How many lost sales of Microsoft's Media Center software and Windows Vista has it caused because the DRM subsystem randomly decides that you must be a criminal?" Johansson wrote.
DRM protections have done very little to stop bootleggers from hawking counterfeit software, he wrote, after witnessing a bustling trade in pirated material on a recent trip to Asia. Johansson wrote that he is now contemplating using LinuxMCE to avoid further difficulties.
Liam Tung of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.
See more CNET content tagged:
digital-rights management, Microsoft Windows Media Center, Media Center PC, Windows Media, Microsoft Corp.





If data is being sold, leased or transfered from one business entity to another then DRM is a perfectly valid form of security and contract enforcement.
Within a business entity DRM has valid uses to prevent documents from unauthorized access.
But...
Leave that crap out of my house.
Don't cram it into my O/S.
Don't pour it over my legally acquired media content.
Don't handcuff me.
Don't take away my right to use things in any legal way I see fit.
It is a double-edged sword and we (the consumer) get cut either way.
So, who wins? MS, of course. And the loser? The consumer--because we keep putting up with this crap from MS. But, it does not necessarily mean just MS. It's any company that puts out crappy products.
Personally, I know a fair few people who have or have had problems with DRM systems, from being unable to play content (4 On Demand won't work full stop on one of my pcs for no apparent reason, for example) to losing access to their music collections through not understanding how Windows Media Player has DRM'd music they ripped.
I pride myself on being able to rip any music cd, dvd, or computer game, and so far very few DRM services have managed to stop me. It does appear easier to misuse the content than to use it as a legitimate consumer, which is entirely backwards to its alleged purpose.
Well, the guy featured in the article is a guy who has prolly forgotten more about the Windows OS than you could ever hope to know in your lifetime, and then there's you...
...who would one believe first?
/P
everyones. There are hundreds of drivers, possibly thousands, and
other software/hardware issues that could cause interoperability
problems. I had so many problems with MS DRM issues to the
point I won't use any MS player if I can help it.
And as far as your nasty little comment about posting under a
handle.... we would know that's your real name... how?
Surprise!
But has anyone bothered to measure the cost of incompetence of a company's actions that go against the fundamental use of purchased product?
I honestly would like to see whether or not the cost of company incompetence can be measured the same way companies measure things like the cost of piracy or the cost of counterfeit merchandise.
Of course, you won't see any company vying to pay for a report on their own incompetence, will you?
Surprise.
The Mac doesn't even have a Media Center/DVR component to speak of that isn't tied to the iTunes service.
I like how you assume that macs are the end of the dark age of computing when they don't even have any type of error reporting or logging mechanisms and after 5 minutes with Apple Support resulted in "Reinstall the OS to fix this problem".
End of the dark ages indeed.
On the other hand, if you were to donate all the money to me that I would need to do so for that purpose, I would get a mac, I suppose. But yeah, I'd still be running Linux. PPC or x86? I'm fine with either.
You of course wouldn't make an offer like that-- but if anyone needs any help migrating to Linux, I'll give you all the help I can- I promise. ethana2@gmail.com -- and I _will_ make good on that.
Yep, that's a worthwhile switch...
Until these major DRM issues have been solved then there may be a grain of truth to what you speak until then your just misinformed.
Anyone thinking 'Ubuntu' or other linux distro is a suitable desktop replacement is just kidding themselves. For starters, the font selection and rendering was horrible. And then I had to spend an inordinate amount of time looking for a decent programmers editor with ssh support (settled for Komodo) and some other basic programs. And while evolution might be a functional email client, it kept dissappearing on me. Not crashing - but simply, and randomly, dissappearing when you used its menus.
Gnome is greatly improved from years past, but still has a way to go.
All in all, while you CAN use linux on the desktop, I cant see any actual reason why I'd want to. Not when compared to Windows or even OSX. Now, if one is so conditioned to hate Microsoft as an almost religious statement, then yes, you might think Linux is a suitable replacement. But you're only fooling yourself.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.isolationism.com/2006-12-27/font-rendering-on-linux/" target="_newWindow">http://www.isolationism.com/2006-12-27/font-rendering-on-linux/</a>
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.press.redhat.com/2007/05/09/liberation-fonts/" target="_newWindow">http://www.press.redhat.com/2007/05/09/liberation-fonts/</a>
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.news.com/Microsofts-forgotten-monopoly/2010-1032_3-6085417.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.news.com/Microsofts-forgotten-monopoly/2010-1032_3-6085417.html</a>
haha
you tried Linux.
now it only a matter of time before you go back to it.
Bug reports ++
Feature requests ++
-- Pointless ranting
And if you think I'm a geek, you might want to rethink saying "anyone" in that last comment.
I dumped XP long ago and haven't looked back! I do programming and web development. There are plenty of good IDEs out there under KDE. There is also Gambas, which is similar to Visual Basic. I do video editing and digital photography, as well as music making under Linux. I have done some desktop publishing as well. Everything I did under XP I can do under Linux...and more!
I'll agree, with some setups there are issues with fonts and the like. But, fonts CAN be added, and with a little tweaking font rendering can be fixed.
I would suggest you try openSUSE or PCLinuxOS...or even DreamLinux. And stay away from Gnome. Go with KDE <4.0 or XFCE.
I don't hate Microsoft, but I do hate what they (and Apple) have done to the consumer side of computing! DRM and all its cousins are a violation to my rights as a consumer and I refuse to support it!
Ultimately MS think the same way, they have a stranglehold on the desktop OS market and they will do anything to keep it that way.
I for one am angry with Apple for putting a region locked DVD device in my MacBook Pro.
Ultimately this just promotes piracy.
If I cant watch a legally rented or purchased DVD
on my laptop, then I am far more likely to download an illegal torrent.
The industry needs to WAKE UP and STOP this ludicrous waste.
Boycott MS
provider and M$' MCE.
In order to close the analog hole CGMS-A was introduced. It is
put in the VBI portion of the analog signal. The provider choses
the method of coping they want to allow and and puts this in the
content. This has no effect on VHS or other like forms of
recording, except it will record the CGMS-A signal onto the VHS
tape. CGMS-A has been around since 1995.
For CGMS-A to be effective the manufactures of devices must
look for it in the VBI and deny or allow the recording based upon
the permissions the provider allows.
The important issue here is there is *no* law that states the
companies must obey the CGMS-A information, wether they do
it or not is up to the manufacture of the item.
Additionally it is not illegal to remove this signal or alter it to
suit your desires, since it is not digital and does not fall under
the prevue of the DMCA.
I, as of yet, have not had any issue with a Mac (using a Canopus
Video capture box) that results in the inability to record anything
analog. However using my Toshiba DVR or M$ I have not been
able to record content protected by CGMS-A without first
altering the CGMS-A signal.
The Fair-Use exception allows only for time-shifting. The ability
to watch the content when you are able to watch it. As On-
Demand is already time-shifted there is no excemption for it.
Premuim networks like HBO and Showtime use the Record Once
flag, which allows you to record it once, watch it later, but not to
record again or burn off to a DVD.
The real and scary direction this is going is lost by people not
looking at which the direction is going.
I find it strange that C|NET did not add this information to the
story. The technical people, in the know, have also appeared to
not post any comments here as well.
Only the same old M$ v Linux v Apple zealots appear to be
posting. However the posts are quite humorous diversions to the
ordinary mundane rituals of my day.
All their problems described would have been easily fixed if they had chosen Mac OSX, XP, Vista, or anything other than Media Center.
Again, this basic understanding casts serious doubt about this person's credibility.
"Stripped down OS"...not really. They took away Domain support and credential caching because fast user switching (which is required for media extenders like the X-Box) can't work with them active. Otherwise it is XP Pro.
I'm also not sure what you were driving at saying it was not meant for networking; networking had nothing to do with his issues.
Last, OSX and XP can't interface with your cable connection and Vista has way more DRM (and problems with it) than MCE. So no, his problem really wouldn't have been solved by using any of those.
On a side note, part of the main thrust of his post was that DRM doesn't deter actual pirates with any great efficiency, and that they likely spend almost as much of more cash on faulty DRM and in lost users than they lost to piracy.
Not true:
"With support for new set-top Media Center Extender network devices, you can now use MCE 2005 to access files on your PC from displays in the other rooms in your home--the TV in your bedroom, for example; each MCE 2005 PC can support up to five Extenders, over wired or wireless networks. Plus MCE 2005 also now supports dual TV tuners, which means you can watch one channel while recording another."
from: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/windows/microsoft-windows-xp-media/4505-3672_7-31138402.html" target="_newWindow">http://reviews.cnet.com/windows/microsoft-windows-xp-media/4505-3672_7-31138402.html</a>
So, err, you were saying?
/P
I'm just glad DRM knew the way to Linux and didn't get lost along the way through Cupertino!
BTW folks DRM Microsoft. RIAA & MPAA = DRM (and all three must die just like SCO)
This guy had a bad round with updates. That doesn't mean DRM = Microsoft.
Come to think of it I've never had any problems updating any of the Linux distros I've ever used! ( Ok I'm lying here... :) )
Does Microsoft even sell digital content such as music and movies?
Enjoy your bashing!
TV is a really bad thing *eyeroll*
Crumble, Crumble, Crumble
Goodbye Microsoft, Hello Linux!!!
You haven't broken the law since you have paid the artist his royalties.
Linux is an open source and a lot of things can learn. No doubt he will made this decision.
But don't believe me. Look at history. After the advent of cheap CD burners, the Internet, and MP3 players, it was said that the record companies would never sell music over the Internet. And yet the success of iTunes and other services a few years later proved that wrong.
Now complex and unworkable DRM schemes are making the next generation of products (Windows Vista, for example) completely undesirable to consumers. Sooner or later, the industry will have to change because nobody is going to buy hardware and software rendered so useless.
- Why is this a news worthy story?
- by SeizeCTRL September 28, 2007 12:45 PM PDT
- Is it because of the DRM issue or is it simply because some ex Microsoft employee is considering switching to Linux?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (79 Comments)If I drop Windows to go Linux, will c|net do a story about me? "MCSE guy ditches Windows for Ubuntu" Seriously, this is a pointless filler story because some guy couldn't record dirty movies from Cinimax and he's upset ;) The fact he once worked at Microsoft is the only real reason why this got front page news... What if the guy worked at Apple and was a video editor and decided to switch from Final Cut to Adobe Premiere? Would this get the same level of attention?