November 5, 2007 4:00 AM PST
DARPA race pushes robotics forward
- Related Stories
DARPA sees inspiration as trophy of robot raceOctober 18, 2007
Stanford robot passes driving testJune 14, 2007
Preparing for DARPA's urban road challengeJanuary 26, 2007
- Related Blogs
Robots drop fast in driverless car race
November 3, 2007
CMU wins $2 million in urban robot race
November 4, 2007
Robot race at the starting gate
November 3, 2007
On Sunday, CMU's Tartan Racing took home
Apart from a little competitive drama and at least one robot wreck, the DARPA Urban Challenge produced a more important win for robotics this year, one that everyone from Whittaker to Stanford's team leader, Sebastian Thrun, pointed out at the race Saturday. That was simply that the competition seeded the idea in people's minds that self-driving cars are possible. Moreover, proponents say the underlying technology will pave the way for a new generation of cars that will help save lives, either through assisted-driving applications for civilian cars or fully autonomous vehicles for the military.
DARPA Director Tony Tether, who conceived of the races, compared Saturday's event to the Wright brothers' flight at Kitty Hawk in the early years of the 20th century, a small step that eventually led to things like jumbo jets.
"Bot on bot was a new
Still, there's much work to be done before autonomous vehicles work well, and the race proved how hard it is. Of the 89 original applicants in the competition, officials chose only 35 to compete in a National Qualifying Event, which weeded out another 24 teams. On race day, only six out of the 11 teams completed DARPA's three required missions to cross the finish line, and then only four accomplished the tasks in under the allotted 6 hours.
"This is a fun event, but these cars are not ready for autonomous driving," Stanford's Thrun said during the race. "There's clearly more development needed."
Nearly all of the teams' robots suffered some difficulty. CMU's Tartan Racing, for example, was set to begin the race early Saturday morning, as the first contestant out of the gates. But it was pushed to the No. 10 slot because a nearby Jumbotron was interfering with its Global Positioning System setup so the car couldn't track its own whereabouts on a map. The team couldn't figure out what was wrong with the robot initially.
Later on, race officials stopped Intelligent Vehicle Systems just out of the starting gate because it nearly hit one of the concrete race-chute dividers. It was cut from the race within the first two hours. Then, in what was the lone robot collision of the race, Cornell's robot hit MIT's Land Rover after MIT tried to pass the Cornell car.
One of the most eye-popping traffic violations involved Team Oshkosh's 24,000-plus-pound truck, which rolled over a curb and nearly struck an old Air Force building before officials hit the emergency stop button on the robot.
DARPA 2007: Competition heats up
CNET checks out the Grand Challenge scene before the race and as the cars launch.
DARPA 2007: Competition gets interesting
Surprise disqualifiers and some mishaps lead to an interesting race.
DARPA 2007: Finalists emerge
CNET speaks with a stunt car driver and race watchers.
Still, the near-accident was amusing to spectators. "I'm definitely amazed by the lack of the human body being in the car," said James Murrell, who drove 60 miles from Lancaster, Calif., with his girlfriend to see the event.
Ultimately, DARPA judged the winners by how well they obeyed traffic laws and by how fast they finished the course. CMU's Boss finished the course nearly 20 minutes faster than Stanford's robot, Junior.
On the flip side, many more winners emerged from the event than just the obvious. Velodyne, for example, developed a high-powered spinning laser, called a lidar, that was used by 7 of the 11 finalists, including CMU, Stanford and MIT. That technology, which includes 64 data-collecting lasers instead of one, was built specifically for autonomous car navigation and was tested in the 2005 Grand Challenge. Now the company sells the sensor for $75,000, more than the cost of most vehicles in the race.
Team sponsors such as Google also appeared prescient. The search giant backed two teams in the winner's circle, CMU and Stanford.
In contrast to the last two races, 2007's challenge had much more of a circus feel. For example, four horses ridden by Marines were supposed to strut out in front of the cars during the opening ceremony, but the animals got spooked and circled each other for a while. More than one person joked that it was a sign that the animals sensed something was off about letting robotic software take the wheel.
Underscoring the heft of the event but with a hint of the carnival, a race official said during the ceremony: "You'll see things today that three years ago you'd never have dreamed about."
Still, the drama of the competition was largely between CMU and Stanford.
In 2004, CMU was pegged the favorite in DARPA's first-ever challenge of autonomous driving vehicles, given that the expertise of the university's robotics department and professor Whittaker. But CMU's autonomous car spun its wheels after only 7 miles on the 142-mile desert course, leaving no winner that year.
In 2005, CMU returned to the Grand Challenge more determined than ever with two race vehicles, heavily outfitted and modified Hummers. However, technical problems with the vehicles brought CMU defeat, and Stanford's team led by Thrun--the former protege of Whittaker--claimed the $1 million prize as a first-time entrant in the race.
Stanford also garnered global attention for accomplishing what hadn't been done before: engineering a car to drive itself more than 132 miles in the desert in less than 10 hours. It's rumored that after the race, CMU's team threw darts at a picture of Stanford's robot, Stanley.
This year, Whittaker's team will be remembered for engineering a robot that could master basic traffic rules while driving among other robots.
One race veteran put it like this: "Competition is huge for this event. The spirit of competition focuses everyone to solve the problem at hand."
7 commentsJoin the conversation! Add your comment