September 20, 2004 1:30 PM PDT

Cybersecurity czar may get a promotion

Congress is returning to computer security topics this fall, with new legislation that proposes a reorganization of the Department of Homeland Security.

A pair of bills introduced last week in the U.S. House of Representatives would hand the department's senior computer security official a higher rank and more authority, as "assistant secretary for cybersecurity." They also put forward a plan to award millions of dollars in grants to colleges and universities for training and education of cybersecurity professionals.

The proposals, sponsored by Mac Thornberry, R-Tex., and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., would effectively promote the department's top cybersecurity official--currently Amit Yoran--by permitting him to report directly to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. Under the current arrangement, Yoran is a relatively low-level official who is two levels of bureaucracy removed from Ridge.

One of the bills would expand Yoran's responsibilities to include the creation of a governmentwide cybersecurity program that would oversee how agencies deal with serious attacks on the Internet infrastructure. The second would permit Yoran to allocate $3.7 million in grants to colleges with "cybersecurity professional development programs" or similar associate degree programs.

"As threats to the cyberinfrastructure increase, it is clear that the United States must pay closer attention and do more to protect our cybersecurity," Thornberry, the chairman of a House cybersecurity subcommittee, said in a statement. Previous efforts to recast Amit's position have failed.

In January, some Democrats on the Homeland Security Committee released a report that blamed the Bush administration for not doing enough regarding computer security. After presidential advisor Richard Clarke left, the report warned, "there is no longer a presidential advisor or senior official with the authority to direct all the agencies responsible for cybersecurity, should a cybercrisis occur."

Lawmakers have been considering other matters to do with computer and Internet security over the past few weeks.

Wayne Abernathy, an assistant Department of the Treasury secretary, warned a House committee this month that U.S. banks were under siege from computer attacks. "These assaults have progressed from computer hackers and pranksters into theft and now, we believe, on to schemes to disrupt the operations of our financial systems," Abernathy said in his prepared testimony. "Some of these attacks have their sources in organized crime. We believe that, increasingly, still more sinister actors are involved."

Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., has proposed amending the Patriot Act to clarify when police may eavesdrop on Internet users without court orders. Currently, that can go ahead when the owner of a computer system gives permission. Because that wording may allow unchecked surveillance of Internet users at cafes, hotels or airport business lounges, Feingold argued, explicit limits are necessary.

One House subcommittee has signaled that liability protection for computer security vendors may be a possibility in the congressional session that begins in early 2005. That will depend, in part, on the results from the Corporate Information Security Working Group, a collection of trade associations that consult with Congress.

1 comment

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Hmmm... NO
I'm sorry, but letting the government spy on us online without a court order seems a bit outlandish for me. Hell, if that happens why not just work for the government so you can Hack all you want to Legally?

Second, What right does the Government have to control the net? The government doesn't run it! its an international ad-hoc network created by businesses and users. The Government has no right to take control and run an international network that they own no part of. The only reason they'd do this Invasion of privacy, is for a future internet tax and ultimately more control.

If the government starts taxing the internet, people with sense will find a way around it. Just setup a long distance wireless connection to cover the nation!

Vote against Government Internet Taxes, and Government Internet Control. The Internet is a frontier for creativity and free speech. Government has no place there.
Posted by eviltoaster (31 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.