Police do not need a search warrant to examine an employee's computer for incriminating files, a Washington state appeals court has ruled.
All that is necessary is the permission of the business that owns the computer, the appeals court said in a 3-0 decision last week.
In April 2003, when Jack Leck briefly worked at a nonprofit organization called the World Peace Ambassadors, he allegedly used an office computer to do Web searches for preteen boys and girls and participate in related mailing lists from his Hotmail account. When police showed up with some questions, the nonprofit group permitted that computer to be seized without a warrant.
Leck was charged with 50 counts of possessing child pornography and sentenced to four years in prison. He claimed the Washington State Patrol Crime Lab's seizure and search of the computer without a warrant was illegal because it violated his Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
The appeals court disagreed. The Washington state Supreme Court has authorized warrantless searches as long as the lawful owner of the property gives consent voluntarily, the court noted. "Leck did not share equal authority with (the nonprofit's director) over the WPA office or computer, thus, Leck's consent to the state's search was not necessary," wrote Judge Marywave Van Deren.
if he's going to do that sick crap on a computer he doesn't own then he's getting what he deserves (not that he doesn't deserve it anyway). If people are going to sensitive, and in this potentially incriminating, information they look into encrypting the files.
you remember.. the country based on freedom? the whole 'innocent 'til proven guilty' thing?
While I agree with you that if he is proven guilty, he is a moron... BUT, on the OTHER hand... let's say you own a business and the FBI barged in and wanted to take the computer used by a long time employee for all your accounting away for 'study', claiming it had terrorist information on it.. would you just let them take it w/o a warrant?
We arer closer to a total police state then any of us realize.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
Data gathered by several companies publishing news readers for both iPhone and iPad suggest that there is a clear difference in when users check out articles via those devices. And anyone wanting to build apps for both devices should heed those lessons.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
the whole 'innocent 'til proven guilty' thing?
While I agree with you that if he is proven guilty, he is a moron...
BUT, on the OTHER hand... let's say you own a business and the
FBI barged in and wanted to take the computer used by a long
time employee for all your accounting away for 'study', claiming
it had terrorist information on it.. would you just let them take it
w/o a warrant?
We arer closer to a total police state then any of us realize.