September 28, 2005 12:27 PM PDT
Congress to legislate file swapping?
- Related Stories
-
How label-backed P2P was born
August 22, 2005 -
Congress threatens P2P networks on porn
July 28, 2005 -
Time for lawmakers to act on Grokster?
July 19, 2005 -
File-swap fallout in Supreme Court ruling
June 27, 2005 -
Congress applauds file-sharing ruling
June 27, 2005 -
The Supreme Court's ruling against P2P
June 27, 2005
Intellectual property protection "can't function in a country where the high-tech services become such that you can't protect copyright," Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, said Wednesday at a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The session centered on the landmark Supreme Court decision on MGM v. Grokster, which ruled that file-sharing services can be liable for their users' infringing behavior.
Pointing to what she called a "rise in peer to peers" since the Grokster decision, Feinstein said current law is not effective enough to deter illegal file swapping and the government must enact stronger enforcement measures. "If we don't stop it," she said, "it's going to destroy these intellectual property industries."
It remained unclear what remedies the senator would seek, though she said she didn't think any lawmakers supported an approach that would involve "going out and arresting high schoolers" who subvert copyright rules. Even so, her statements marked somewhat of a departure: When the Grokster decision initially came out, members of Congress said they were inclined to take a hands-off, wait-and-see approach.
Committee chair Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, indicated that Congress was better suited than the courts to address the matter. But at the close of the hearing, he announced, "At least in the short term, I think we'll carry out the wishes of those who want us to do nothing."
That, indeed, was the sentiment senators generally heard from members of a panel representing the peer-to-peer, recording industry, consumer electronics and legal realms--echoing statements similar entities made at an earlier Senate hearing.
But Mary Beth Peters, registrar for the U.S. Copyright Office, said Congress needs to take immediate action on reforming what she deemed an "antiquated" section of copyright law that provides an "inefficient process to license musical works."
The law's "one at a time" approach for licensing individual musical works creates a tremendous roadblock for legitimate online services looking to add large amounts of media to their catalogs, she said. She--and later, Recording Industry Association of American President Cary Sherman--said a "blanket" licensing approach may be an option.
Lawmakers and panelists alike also indicated interest in promoting one-stop, third-party copyright registries--such as Snocap, created by Napster founder Shawn Fanning--that would amass terms of distribution from copyright holders and make them available to interested online retailers. Such a process is designed to save retailers time by erasing their need to broker large numbers of individual deals.
See more CNET content tagged:
Grokster Ltd.,
senator,
file-swapping,
P2P,
file-sharing

Isnt there more important things our elected representatives should be doing than catering to a bloated outdated media industry?
Isnt there more important things our elected representatives should be doing than catering to a bloated outdated media industry?
infringing behavior."
OK. Given that logic. It will now finally be possible to persecute gun
makers wherein their sold guns kill people.
infringing behavior."
OK. Given that logic. It will now finally be possible to persecute gun
makers wherein their sold guns kill people.
But if what congress wants (or some of its members want) is to disallow the transfer of anything unless specifically licensed, or to collect a tax on the transfer of all works and give the money to just a few information merchants, then perhaps it should go to China to learn how to control the internet.
But if what congress wants (or some of its members want) is to disallow the transfer of anything unless specifically licensed, or to collect a tax on the transfer of all works and give the money to just a few information merchants, then perhaps it should go to China to learn how to control the internet.
found guilty of payola schemes, price fixing and not paying
royalties due to the authors the claim to represent.
Instead, we'll just make it illegal -- throw more people in jail. It's
worked so well for the drug problem.
"What are you in for?"
"I traded a song on the internet."
This only goes to prove how corrupted our Senators are. They've
extended copyrights to outrageous terms for these greedy
people. Enough is enough!
found guilty of payola schemes, price fixing and not paying
royalties due to the authors the claim to represent.
Instead, we'll just make it illegal -- throw more people in jail. It's
worked so well for the drug problem.
"What are you in for?"
"I traded a song on the internet."
This only goes to prove how corrupted our Senators are. They've
extended copyrights to outrageous terms for these greedy
people. Enough is enough!
High schools are a central location for the acquisition of numerous types of contraband and ideas. They may serve a purpose, but they provide a means for criminals, and those who act against their spirirt, to do evil, so we MUST shut them down, just like bittorrent and the P2P networks that provide valuable services but can be abused by individual criminals who choose to abuse them!
Nevermind the current lack of quality material provided by mainstream media services, and the unrealistic standard set by pre-2000 CD sales, the RIAA is looking out for YOU! The MPAA wants YOU to be happy!!! Buy more of the CRAP they sell and you'll love your life!
High schools are a central location for the acquisition of numerous types of contraband and ideas. They may serve a purpose, but they provide a means for criminals, and those who act against their spirirt, to do evil, so we MUST shut them down, just like bittorrent and the P2P networks that provide valuable services but can be abused by individual criminals who choose to abuse them!
Nevermind the current lack of quality material provided by mainstream media services, and the unrealistic standard set by pre-2000 CD sales, the RIAA is looking out for YOU! The MPAA wants YOU to be happy!!! Buy more of the CRAP they sell and you'll love your life!
so, go ahead and talk about protecting the interests of copyright holders. but also talk about the interests of the consumers. that's directed at everyone, but especially the riaa, mpaa and our congress.
mark d.
so, go ahead and talk about protecting the interests of copyright holders. but also talk about the interests of the consumers. that's directed at everyone, but especially the riaa, mpaa and our congress.
mark d.
I thought Hollywood was the equivalent of the anti-Christ to the Republicans? Doesn't Hollywood embody and promote all of the vile liberal ideals and values that are so reviled and despised by the right?
And now the Republican controlled congress is looking into creating legislation that would perpetuate the very economic model that allows Hollywood to produce the filth that they so object to?
When you're up for re-election and you need those red state votes, rail against the Hollywood hydra. When it comes time to step up to protect big business and campaign donations, switch sides.
Duplicity at it's finest.
I thought Hollywood was the equivalent of the anti-Christ to the Republicans? Doesn't Hollywood embody and promote all of the vile liberal ideals and values that are so reviled and despised by the right?
And now the Republican controlled congress is looking into creating legislation that would perpetuate the very economic model that allows Hollywood to produce the filth that they so object to?
When you're up for re-election and you need those red state votes, rail against the Hollywood hydra. When it comes time to step up to protect big business and campaign donations, switch sides.
Duplicity at it's finest.
All of you people who are posting these attacks on the record labels need to understand that somebody HAS to make money on the music or you will NOT get anymore PROFESSIONAL music at all... soon all that will be left is the crap that you hear on MP3.com...
which is free already and you DON'T want it...
You keep stealing the good stuff... the PROFESSIONAL music. If you want to continue having that music, you need to pay for it.
THOU SHALT NOT STEAL... there's a very simple law... try to follow it for a change.
- Songwriters need protection!
-
by
September 29, 2005 11:02 AM PDT
- Songwriters need REAL protection from illegal file sharing... the Grokster case was a good first step, but further steps are needed to insure that American music is not destroyed by a pack of theives...
-
Reply to this comment
View
all 2 replies
-
-
See all 44 Comments >>All of you people who are posting these attacks on the record labels need to understand that somebody HAS to make money on the music or you will NOT get anymore PROFESSIONAL music at all... soon all that will be left is the crap that you hear on MP3.com...
which is free already and you DON'T want it...
You keep stealing the good stuff... the PROFESSIONAL music. If you want to continue having that music, you need to pay for it.
THOU SHALT NOT STEAL... there's a very simple law... try to follow it for a change.