- Related Stories
-
Senate may hoist broadcast flag again
January 24, 2006 -
Tension grows between labels and digital radio
January 13, 2006 -
Politicians want to raise broadcast flag
September 30, 2005 -
Why the broadcast flag should go forward
May 26, 2005 -
Why the broadcast flag won't work
May 26, 2005 -
Court yanks down FCC's broadcast flag
May 6, 2005 -
FCC nears vote on TV 'broadcast flag'
October 28, 2003
Rep. Mike Ferguson, a New Jersey Republican, said his bill--which would enforce a so-called "broadcast flag" for digital and satellite audio receivers--was necessary to protect the music industry from the threat of piracy.
Consumer electronics makers are hoping 2006 will be the year of HD Radio. Like satellite radio, HD Radio requires a special receiver. Unlike satellite radio, though, it picks up digital signals transmitted over the same frequencies that FM radio uses. Many are commercial-free.
CNET has reviewed the Boston Acoustics Recepter Radio HD and the Yamaha RX-V4600.
Ferguson's proposal would grant the Federal Communications Commission the power to enforce "prohibitions against unauthorized copying and redistribution" for both digital over-the-air radio and digital satellite receivers.
"With exciting new digital audio devices on the market today and more on the horizon, Congress needs to streamline the deployment of digital services and protect the intellectual property rights of creators," said Ferguson, who is a member of the House of Representatives' Internet subcommittee. Rep. Mary Bono, a California Republican, is one of the four other co-sponsors.
Without explicit authorization from Congress, the FCC can't get away with mandating an audio broadcast flag on its own. That's because a federal appeals court last year unceremoniously rejected a similar set of regulations from the FCC, saying the agency did not have authority to mandate a broadcast flag for digital video.
At a breakfast roundtable with reporters on Thursday, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) said some sort of legislation is necessary to prevent Americans from saving high-quality music from digital broadcasts, assembling a "personal music library" of their own, and redistributing "recorded songs over the Internet or on removable media."
Devices like the Sirius S50, the RIAA worries, can record satellite radio broadcasts but aren't required to include digital rights management limitations.
But the RIAA and Ferguson may face an uphill battle in Congress. At a hearing in January, some senators expressed concern that an audio flag would infringe on traditional notions of fair use rights, and the politically powerful National Association of Broadcasters also urged caution on the audio flag.
The recording industry is worried about a new generation of digital radio and satellite services that send high-quality digital signals along with the associated metadata--song title and artist, for example. Some of the new devices include hard drives that allow these songs to be archived and played back later, and some, such as the popular Sirus S50, can also be connected to a computer.
The satellite radio companies have grappled with the issue of unauthorized copying in the past, although there is little or no evidence showing that their networks have helped seed file-swapping networks or other piracy hubs. XM Satellite Radio pulled a PC version of its receiver off the market in 2004, when an independent company created a tool that let songs be archived on the computer's hard drive.
CNET News.com's John Borland contributed to this report.
See more CNET content tagged:
satellite radio, digital radio, RIAA, satellite, HD radio
brain power does it take to figure that option out? More,
apparently, than the Washington 'experts' can come up with
Hot dang. How dare people try to have a personal music library so they can listen to music they paid to listen to. If you follow other news in this area the RIAA is also stating in court that if you buy a CD, it is illegal for you to make a copy of it...
Stand by. They are working towards a point that the local radio station has to pay a royalty to play the music and you will have to pay a royalty to then listen to it.
Assembling a personal library has been an acceptable practice for many years. It's the distribution part that is cause for concern--to the RIAA. It's all about the corporations, not the musicians.
All this argument already took place when reel to reel tape recorders became available, and then again when cassette recorders became available. The music industry feared they would lose revenue due to copying. It turned out to be exactly the opposite. Both recording technologies had the effect of increasing sales. The narrow minded RIAA execs fail to recognize this.
BTW, all my own released recordings are available at archive.org for free. Musicians unite against the machine!
Man what are those guys on capitol hill smoking & drinking or are they just using plain angel dust, to create these stupid lame duck luddite laws!
Sheez, talk about brain dead zombies walking amongst the living, just become a congressperson or senator, thereafter leave your brain at home and whip out the feeding and leeching hand to milk the broker groups for every cent you can muster!
The RIAA uses the P-word to garner attention and garner political sympathy, but their real agenda is turning the consumer into an endless revenue stream.
Once again Congress has proved it's for sale to the highest bidder.
As the voting public seems to stupid to vote out just about everyone currently holding public office, the only way to combat this is to have more money than the corporations that want these sorts of laws in place.
You wait until the next election - this fall I believe - and watch all the lies about reform and honesty, the crap about liberals and conservatives, all the same rhetoric from all the same people, and for some reason we fall for it every time and vote these thieves back into office.
Basically it doesn't matter who you replace them with, it's got to be better than what we have now. I don't care if you vote liberal, conservative or independant, just as long as it's not the incumbent congressasshole.
It won't happen though, people here are thick witted enough to believe anything they're told on TV, despite the fact that not one politician has ever fulfilled anything of substance.
All they care about is money, and who's getting it. They'll exploit any disaster or atrocity to inrich their chosen corporate sponsors, and they're all guilty of doing it.
6 months gone, billions of dollars spent, and people are still living in tents in New Orleans. It would be one thing if we had refused to help, but that's not what happened. They were promised aid, the money was taken from the tax payers and given to people that had no intention of using it for the purpose it was intended for.
It the same thing with Iraq. 3 years later, 200 billion spent, nothing tangible has happened.
Face it, the days of true representation are gone. We, the people have a small say, and only then by shouting loud enough for Spain and Portugal to wince from the sound.
As far as the New Orleans help goes, to me its because everyone in the high ups and the media keep trying to point fingers at who is to blame.
Stop blaming people and just go ahead and help already!
digital radio? If someone is seriously doing this, let them have it.
Because its apparent they haven't much in the way of a life outside
of their little hobby.
This is reaching such a level of idiocy, you can sense the whole
game about to implode from within, any second now.
How can an audio stream encoded at such a low bitrate be considered high quality, have these guys even listened to sat radio?
For those who don't know Sat Radio sounds as good as free internet radio, you know the radio stations that stream 64kbs. Ya, though some stations on Sat do stream higher bitrate audio, it isn't MUCH higher.
People who record sat radio and encode that audio to mp3 degrade the sound even further...
CNET please stop stating that sat radio is High Quality!
I haven't read it but I wouldn't be surprised if attempt to extend this to nearly everything. Now the question is, who are the companies who supply the FCC qualified DRM systems?
The FCC is far too powerful for it's own purpose and giving this piece of power just ups the largess of the government bureaucracy. I've got an idea, why don't we just drop the wite and blue from the flag, paint a star yellow and call it done.
I'm sure once the RIAA has the hardware and software locked up tight they will extort an even higher price for the product. They will still make huge profits, as before DRM, but fewer will be able to afford it and use it. It's their product and that's the way the chips fall. It's time for a new "Opensource" type music organization. I'm sure we'll see it in our lifetime.
http://politechbot.com/docs/ferguson.audio.flag.bill.030206.pdf
Senator------------------ $2.00
Will pass any bill to stick it to the consumer.
;)
Larry Winward
And with a 25 or 30 percent interest rate on your card, you're guaranteed to be paying for your entertainment for the rest of your life!
America: the best democracy money can buy!
they will do as Special Interests - dictate.
One of the sites that I have found that lets us express how we feel about pending legislation is the following...www.hrrc.org (Home Recording Rights Coalition) It's worth the visit...Don
I say everyone stop buying copy protected CD's and DVD, DRM infected motherboards and PC's and of course Windows Vista (which is also gonna be DRM infected).
All these laws plus DRM is what leads us to the future where our culture is completely locked up by corporate industry at the expense of our freedom to enjoy our culture the way we like it, not the way they like it.
An alternatives to the malicious tools of this corporate industry are Free Software, the GNU/Linux operating system, Creative Commons music and other arts, the Free Culture that we are trying to bring back and preserve. To hell with RIAA, MPAA and the likes.. the way they are, they have no place in a digital present nor the digital future! They're just extorting both artists and people. The truth is that neither of us need them as an intermediary anymore, for long time already.
Thanks
Danijel Orsolic
www.libervis.com - free culture portal
- How much longer?
- by cosmicall March 3, 2006 3:37 PM PST
- How much longer are we gonna take this people!? The way it is going we might end up in this kind of future sooner than we'd expect it: http://tarmle.livejournal.com/80182.html
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(25 Comments)I say everyone stop buying copy protected CD's and DVD, DRM infected motherboards and PC's and of course Windows Vista (which is also gonna be DRM infected).
All these laws plus DRM is what leads us to the future where our culture is completely locked up by corporate industry at the expense of our freedom to enjoy our culture the way we like it, not the way they like it.
An alternatives to the malicious tools of this corporate industry are Free Software, the GNU/Linux operating system, Creative Commons music and other arts, the Free Culture that we are trying to bring back and preserve. To hell with RIAA, MPAA and the likes.. the way they are, they have no place in a digital present nor the digital future! They're just extorting both artists and people. The truth is that neither of us need them as an intermediary anymore, for long time already.
Thanks
Danijel Orsolic
www.libervis.com - free culture portal