Several companies, including Yahoo, AT&T and Microsoft, are encouraging regulators to take a close look at Google's planned purchase of online-ad company DoubleClick.
Although the companies have yet to file any formal objections with regulators in the U.S. or Europe, they are beginning to publicly voice their concerns, according to a source close to one of the companies.
If the deal goes through, Google would account for 80 percent of the ads served on the Internet, the source said.
In a statement on Sunday, Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith called for regulators to give the deal a hard look.
"This proposed acquisition raises serious competition and privacy concerns in that it gives the Google-DoubleClick combination unprecedented control in the delivery of online advertising and access to a huge amount of consumer information by tracking what customers do online," Smith said. "We think this merger deserves close scrutiny from regulatory authorities to ensure a competitive online-advertising market."
Google could not immediately be reached for comment Sunday. A Yahoo representative declined to comment.
Google plans to buy DoubleClick from San Francisco-based private-equity firm Hellman & Friedman, which acquired DoubleClick two years ago for $1.1 billion, and JMI Equity. The deal is subject to regulatory approval.
David Drummond, senior vice president of corporate development at Google, said he is confident that antitrust regulators will approve the agreement.
I tend to agree. This is not a market where one company actually holds monopoly power (not like, say, on desktop operating systems and office software) and both MS and Yahoo had several years head start on Google but they've lost out. Mind you, doubleclick was already huge -- I wonder how much of that 80% already belongs to Google as opposed to doubleclick. Either way, if Google won the bid then more power to them. Even with 80% they won't have a monopoly because anyone anywhere is free to serve up their own ads and to provide that service to others the way all four of the companies mentioned here already do.
If Microsoft had won the bidding the Tinfoil Hat Brigade would be out in force screaming about monopoly and threats to competition. But since it's Google, people cheer about it as if they were GOOG shareholders.
The posts in this thread reveal the usual double standard about MS: when Microsoft has 80% of whatever market, it is a monopoly that should be stopped; when Google does the same in the online world, it is OK, because they are *very nice people*. No guys, they are *the same kind of people*: people in the business of making money! Go get a clue...
Chinese authorities have reportedly taken iPads from a third-party retailer, a move apparently brought on by Apple's continued refusal to honor a trademark for the iPad name owned by a Chinese manufacturer.
NY professor believes that a word-based algorithm can help bring together those who believe, with one glimpse, that they have found and lost the love of their lives.
After a higher-than-expected fourth quarter, the video subscription service unburdens itself of a pending yearlong class action suit and settles for $9 million.
Along with green-lighting Google's buy of Motorola, the Justice Department today OKs an Apple-Microsoft-RIM partnership deal to buy Nortel patents, and Apple's plan to acquire Novell patents.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
This week, we pass around Sony's new PlayStation Vita for some hands-on testing, check out HP's newest Beats Audio laptop, and debate the best and worst Valentine's Day gadget gifts.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
Wow.
ROFL.
No guys, they are *the same kind of people*: people in the business of making money! Go get a clue...