March 22, 2007 9:48 AM PDT

Companies like Web 2.0 tech--but from big vendors

Forrester Research published a report this week with a classic good news-bad news conclusion for Web 2.0 start-ups: corporate buyers want Web 2.0 technologies but they'd rather buy from bigger vendors.

The IT research company surveyed 119 chief information officers at companies with more than 500 employees and found a strong appetite for Web 2.0 technologies, including software for blogs, wikis, podcasts, RSS, social networking and content tagging.

The preferred delivery for these Web 2.0 technologies, however, is through integrated product suites, the CIOs said. That's because these corporations are concerned with integrating new tools with the software from their existing suppliers.

"When asked if they would prefer offerings from major incumbent vendors like Microsoft, IBM, or Oracle rather than from smaller pure play firms like Socialtext, NewsGator, or MindTouch, the vast majority of CIOs indicated a preference for large vendors," according to the study which was written by G. Oliver Young.

IBM, Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, BEA Systems and other incumbent software vendors have each sought to incorporate Web 2.0 technologies into their applications. Nearly all the respondents in the survey said they were using at least one kind of Web 2.0 technology, largely because it makes their businesses more efficient.

"CIOs were most likely to view social networking and blogs as unnecessary, with a little more than half of respondents reporting as such," according to Forrester. "The Web 2.0 technologies that had relatively clear user benefits, RSS, wikis, and tagging, were less likely to be viewed as unnecessary."

Forrester recommended that smaller Web 2.0 companies partner with established firms. It also predicted that consolidation in the Web 2.0 market will continue.

See more CNET content tagged:
Web 2.0, Forrester Research Inc., CIO, Wiki, vendor

1 comment

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Clunky Web 2.0
I work for a large corporation that has turned to a modified Microsoft SharePoint services implementation for Web 2.0 technologies. It is really pretty junky and also way overpriced.
Posted by weavercs (9 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.