September 25, 2007 4:00 AM PDT

Citywide Wi-Fi isn't dead yet

Citywide Wi-Fi isn't dead yet
Despite the recent onslaught of bad press, citywide and regional Wi-Fi networks are not dead.

In fact, cities, such as Corpus Christi, Texas; Minneapolis, Minn.; and Philadelphia, are actually seeing early signs of success. And lessons learned from these deployments if applied properly could help save bigger and more, ambitious projects such as Silicon Valley's regional wireless network.

Two of the biggest lessons that other cities can take away from projects currently under way are having a clear mission and use case for building these networks and also defining a business model for building and sustaining the network.

"Cities that have seen early success have been able to articulate very clearly to politicians and citizens how the network will be used and how it will benefit people," said Craig Settles, an independent wireless consultant. "And they've also had clear business plans for paying for the networks."

In the very earliest days of citywide Wi-Fi, this appeared to be the case. Cities, such as Corpus Christi, looked into Wi-Fi to solve a particular problem. The city wanted to allow its utility workers to read water and gas meters remotely. Wi-Fi seemed like a perfect solution.

"Cities that have seen early success have been able to articulate very clearly to politicians and citizens how the network will be used and how it will benefit people."
--Craig Settles
wireless consultant

The city soon expanded the scope of its network to also enable building inspectors, code enforcers, police, firefighters and emergency medical technicians to communicate wirelessly with each other. And now Wi-Fi is also used to keep tabs on city property such as vehicles and provide remote surveillance in certain parts of the city. Earlier this year, Corpus Christi sold its network to EarthLink, which will not only provide the wireless service to several city agencies, but also sell consumer broadband services to residents for $20 a month.

Minneapolis also built its citywide network with the express intent of using it for public safety and to connect city agencies together. USI Wireless, which is deploying the Wi-Fi gear and providing the service, had only a small portion of the network built in early August when a major bridge collapse put the emergency Wi-Fi network to the test.

Within hours, the network was opened up to all users, allowing people with dual mode Wi-Fi phones to communicate without clogging the cellular network. In the days and weeks that followed, the Wi-Fi network has also been instrumental in rescue and recovery efforts around the disaster site.

Philadelphia, which started building its network more than a year ago, took a different tack. The city saw Wi-Fi as a way to bridge the gap between rich and poor by providing low-cost broadband service to disadvantaged citizens.

EarthLink, which saw citywide Wi-Fi as an opportunity to own its own network infrastructure, won the contract to build and run the network. In addition to paying for the network, EarthLink also committed to providing some funding for the city's nonprofit group Wireless Philadelphia, which subsidizes Internet service for Philadelphia's low-income households and helps provide training and equipment.

Subscriber numbers in Philadelphia have not been released, but Greg Goldman, CEO of the nonprofit group Wireless Philadelphia, said that thousands of retail customers and dozens of nonprofit groups have already begun using the network, which is still not fully deployed. One of the biggest boosts in usage came when Drexel University, which owns and operates one of the largest wireless networks in the country, added the Wireless Philadelphia service to its array of services that it offers to students and faculty.

"There's no question the ground is shifting," Goldman said. "But wireless technology isn't going away. And it provides a much needed service for low-income people. We've been very clear from the beginning of that focus. And we believe it creates an enormous market for broadband."

After Philadelphia came on the scene, expectations of citywide Wi-Fi exploded. Soon cities, such as San Francisco, were promising free wireless broadband access for all citizens funded through advertising.

Other cities quickly jumped on the bandwagon and "free Wi-Fi for all" soon became a rallying cry for many Wi-Fi deployments.

EarthLink's management soon realized that the current business model would not suffice. And earlier this summer the company said it would not bid on any new city contracts. Then last month, EarthLink started pulling out of some contracts in cities where construction had not yet started, including networks in San Francisco and Houston.

The problem that EarthLink is facing is simple. The company, which has mostly focused on providing an alternative broadband service to consumers, has not found a sustainable business model. And in many of the cities where it had hoped to provide service there was not a clear message of what the technology could bring to the city.

CONTINUED: A new industry…
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
EarthLink Inc., Philadelphia, Wi-Fi network, Minneapolis, city


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Successful because they thought it through?
If I'm reading this article right, a successful citywide roll out of Wi-Fi was dependant on the city leaders stating goals and building a business plan that was viable and sticking to those goals and the muni Wi-Fi plans that failed were plans that threw money at an opportunity and hope that something stuck?
How many times have city leaders done this with other projects?
Hopefully, all leadership can take a lesson from this outcome in the municipal Wi-Fi plans, or any other projects that the leaders have to take on for the future: plans that have a sound business sense to them are more likely to succeed than those that are haphazardly thrown together. I hope the cities that are able to roll out Wi-Fi for the masses have constituents that are aware that they have leaders that are able to get something done and vote for these people again in the future.
Posted by wsuschmitt (30 comments )
Reply Link Flag
By 2009, WiMax will start to mature and the number of required access points to blanket a city using WiMax will be far less than Wi-Fi.

The system management and ISP connection costs will still be there, but a great percentage of the cost is installing and maintaining hundreds or thousands of Wi-Fi access points.

By 2009, the WiMax receivers will have dropped significantly in price and municipal wireless Internet will start to blanket the country.

I can't predict the weather, but I feel pretty comfortable about this one.
Posted by regulator1956 (577 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Simple but effective piece
One needs only watch how 2 networks in deployment show what a true Carrier Grade Network should and can look like. Minneapolis (BelAIr) and the Wireless Mesh in Boston Suburbs (Strix).
Without the right technology ones business plan goes south very quickly.
Future Wireless Distribution:
1. Last 1000-1500Ft Access links to Portable and Mobile Wireless nets will be provided by Wireless Mesh networks-4 & 6 Radio Nodes using 802.11n for the backhaul.
2. Metro Area or Wide Area Broadband Nets (WAN) will be based on a 700Mhz WiMAX system that will allow providers to compete with fixed/wired DSL/Cable modem services by leveraging both indoor and portable mobile access with one device (Intel Centrino w/802.11n and 700Mhz WiMAX).
3. CellCO will provide State/County wide Narrowband data and improved Voice coverage in these markest with new FMC/UMA based handoffs betrween the 3 networks.

Posted by jacomo (115 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.