Intel and several corporate partners launched a program on Thursday aimed at helping cities use wireless networks to better serve their citizens--and perhaps make a little cash on the side.
Thirteen cities are currently participating in the initiative, called "Digital Communities." Its goal is to give cities technical resources and discounts to help them establish or build out their broadband wireless infrastructure so they can better connect with police and fire personnel as well as with public-works employees such as meter readers and building inspectors.
The program also educates city leaders on ways they can use their wireless network as a commercial service, by selling access to the system and by providing wireless services to consumers.
Cities take on big Wi-Fi projects--and face challenges to their plans.
Intel's project is heavily supported by other technology companies, including Cisco, Dell, IBM, and German-owned SAP. Intel, which has been
an advocate for municipal wireless networks for several years, is also working closely with Muniwireless.com, an online site devoted to municipal wireless broadband, to help develop case studies focused on Wi-Fi network development.
The program could be a boon to cities that don't already have the expertise it takes to build a commercially viable wireless network, said JupiterResarch analyst Julie Ask. A boon, that is, if they can get the public behind the project.
"Communities are going to have a hard time persuading their constituents that bridging the digital divide or free Wi-Fi on Main Street are worthwhile uses of tax dollars," said Ask. "However, when you mix in a long list of benefits--some quantifiable and some more qualitative--it's a lot easier to get to the point where folks think, 'Yeah, this makes sense.'"
Ask said cities can leverage Intel's investments into a bit of revenue for themselves from a number of sources, such as occasional wireless hotspot users and residents not already served by a broadband Internet service provider.
The program can also help cities save money, Ask said, because support services for city employees in the field can be provided more efficiently using wireless communication.
Administrators in some large cities already view wireless broadband technology as a feasible, low-cost alternative to broadband services provided by commercial carriers such as phone companies and cable companies.
San Francisco announced this week that it is developing a program that would blanket the city's entire 49 square miles with free or inexpensive wireless service. The city will make special efforts to provide broadband access to its low-income neighborhoods, according to the city's mayor, Gavin Newsom.
Cleveland, Ohio; Corpus Christi, Texas; Philadelphia; Portland, Ore.; Duesseldorf, Germany; Jerusalem, Israel; and Taipei, Taiwan, are among the urban communities participating in Intel's project. Other participants are Mangaratiba, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Gyor, Hungary; Principality of Monaco; Seoul, South Korea; Osaka, Japan; and Westminster in London.
Corpus Christi, for example, is installing a 147-square-mile multiuse network that will let private and public users share the same wireless system. Taipei is using its wireless networks to support some 500 agencies, as well as to create an online university program for its 2.63 million citizens.
Cleveland is expecting to expand its wireless network, powered by OneCleveland, to enhance public safety, improve access to health care information and services and expand distance learning.
Can this initiative circumvent Pennsylvania's new law (at the behest of Verizon and Comcast), that stopped Philadelphia from delevoping a municipal wireless network? If so, I imagine the federal proposal to do the same thing may put a stop to it.
I also see the FCC getting involved, on behalf of corporate America, just like they did by ruling that telephone companies don't have to share DSL lines, because DSL is an "information" service, not a "telecommunications" services.
That decision is flawed in too many ways for me to list, but suffice to say, the interest of the public is not being served.
Can this initiative circumvent Pennsylvania's new law (at the behest of Verizon and Comcast), that stopped Philadelphia from delevoping a municipal wireless network? If so, I imagine the federal proposal to do the same thing may put a stop to it.
I also see the FCC getting involved, on behalf of corporate America, just like they did by ruling that telephone companies don't have to share DSL lines, because DSL is an "information" service, not a "telecommunications" services.
That decision is flawed in too many ways for me to list, but suffice to say, the interest of the public is not being served.
I'd like to see this kick-off. For as long as it can keep itself alive, for as long as it can keep up with the demand and for as long as it can upgrade to new technologies as well as it can stay "low cost", it's a service with foresight targetting the unstoppable growth of wireless.
I'd like to see this kick-off. For as long as it can keep itself alive, for as long as it can keep up with the demand and for as long as it can upgrade to new technologies as well as it can stay "low cost", it's a service with foresight targetting the unstoppable growth of wireless.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
The Silicon Valley online payments startup grew by 1,000 percent last year and is hopeful it can repeat that level of growth this year. To do that, it's had to move away from its early friends-and-family roots and embrace small businesses.
Chamtech's spray-on antenna uses a nano material to provide a low-power boost to antenna range. The wireless-in-a-can product may some day bring an end to unsightly cell towers.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
I also see the FCC getting involved, on behalf of corporate America, just like they did by ruling that telephone companies don't have to share DSL lines, because DSL is an "information" service, not a "telecommunications" services.
That decision is flawed in too many ways for me to list, but suffice to say, the interest of the public is not being served.
I also see the FCC getting involved, on behalf of corporate America, just like they did by ruling that telephone companies don't have to share DSL lines, because DSL is an "information" service, not a "telecommunications" services.
That decision is flawed in too many ways for me to list, but suffice to say, the interest of the public is not being served.
You think it's hot this year? Wait until San Francisco becomes a 49 square mile microwave oven.
San Francisco will become the City of No Goldfish very quickly ;)
You think it's hot this year? Wait until San Francisco becomes a 49 square mile microwave oven.
San Francisco will become the City of No Goldfish very quickly ;)