- Related Stories
-
Patent office issues final rejection of NTP patent
February 22, 2006 -
RIM's work-around revealed
February 9, 2006 -
FAQ: Will BlackBerrys be shut down?
February 2, 2006 -
U.S. Supreme Court rejects RIM's appeal
January 23, 2006 -
RIM loses patent-infringement ruling
August 5, 2003 -
Jury: RIM infringed on patents
November 21, 2002
On Capitol Hill, where "CrackBerry" addiction is rampant, some thumb-typists are even expressing their anxiety in poetry. "'Freedom!' will the joyful say, Released from slavery today! Yet others'll suffer horrid angst if their little screens go blank," Larry Neal, deputy staff director for communications at the U.S. House of Representatives' Energy and Commerce Committee, wrote in an 18-line poem.
Tongue-in-cheek poetry aside, to millions of BlackBerry users, there's nothing funny about Friday's court hearing, which could draw to an end one aspect of the long-running patent spat between Ontario-based Research In Motion and Virginia-based patent-holding firm NTP.
At the hearing in U.S. District Judge James Spencer's Richmond, Va., courtroom, lawyers for NTP, RIM and the federal government will argue over whether to
"I'm shocked that RIM hasn't settled," said Gary Abelev, a patent attorney with the New York law firm Dorsey & Whitney. The company had the opportunity to settle the case for $450 million last year, but that deal fell through. An injunction would prevent the sale of RIM's primary source of revenue in its largest market, effectively crippling the company.
RIM's answer to a possible injunction is a so-called workaround. The company earlier this month revealed sketchy details of the software-based workaround it says will be made available for download if an injunction occurs.
NTP is likely to argue that the workaround violates the same claims in the patents, and numerous hearings will probably follow, Abelev said. If the workaround is declared invalid, RIM is back to square one with nothing to show for millions in legal fees, he said.
RIM's other hope is that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office strikes down all of NTP's patents. The BlackBerry received a boost Wednesday when the USPTO issued a final rejection of one of the five patents in question, but NTP can appeal that decision through several more avenues, extending the case even further. Watching and waiting
On Capitol Hill, all 100 senators, 435 House members and myriad staffers tote BlackBerrys. "It might be a nice change," said one Senate aide, who asked to remain anonymous. "Instead of looking at my BlackBerry the first thing in the morning, I might actually be able to take a shower without work on my mind."
Lawyers at the Los Angeles law firm Allen & Matkins are less amused at the prospect of losing their BlackBerrys. The firm's chief technology officer, Frank Gillman, is counting on RIM's workaround to keep his legal team in contact with clients, he said in an e-mail interview.
See more CNET content tagged:
NTP, Research In Motion Ltd., injunction, RIM BlackBerry, James Spencer




Nir Ben-Dor
I write for Linkadelic Magazine. You can too
http://www.comagz.com/webmagazine/
Nir Ben-Dor
I write for Linkadelic Magazine. You can too
http://www.comagz.com/webmagazine/
He needs the judge/government to take Blackberrys away from everyone to save him from himself - more dictatorship of the judiciary.
How about some discipline? Just don't look at your Blackberry in the morning! Problem solved!
He needs the judge/government to take Blackberrys away from everyone to save him from himself - more dictatorship of the judiciary.
How about some discipline? Just don't look at your Blackberry in the morning! Problem solved!
Until that has happened, and even though common sense would seem to say that the judge in this matter should deny any form of injunction until the matter has been resolved, officially those patents are valid and he could still shut down RIMs network.
So while it seems obvious to you what the outcome should be, when does common sense ever prevail in a courtroom, especially when patents are involved.
The reality is that all a patent is, is someone saying "I thought of that before you did, and even though I had no clue how to implement the idea, you should still pay me money for using it."
Copyright is the protection of an actual product, which is why software patents don't exist in Europe, yet.
Patents for me are complete fraud, all of them should be struck down, no one should have any legal protection for merely thinking up something without at least having a valid, and independently assessed working design for implementing the idea.
The only exception in this case should be for the Crackberry - which is ofcourse the bane of all existance, the Devil incarnate in cell phone form, the evil from which all bloggers are spawned.
Death to the Crackberry. Long live the Treo.
Until that has happened, and even though common sense would seem to say that the judge in this matter should deny any form of injunction until the matter has been resolved, officially those patents are valid and he could still shut down RIMs network.
So while it seems obvious to you what the outcome should be, when does common sense ever prevail in a courtroom, especially when patents are involved.
The reality is that all a patent is, is someone saying "I thought of that before you did, and even though I had no clue how to implement the idea, you should still pay me money for using it."
Copyright is the protection of an actual product, which is why software patents don't exist in Europe, yet.
Patents for me are complete fraud, all of them should be struck down, no one should have any legal protection for merely thinking up something without at least having a valid, and independently assessed working design for implementing the idea.
The only exception in this case should be for the Crackberry - which is ofcourse the bane of all existance, the Devil incarnate in cell phone form, the evil from which all bloggers are spawned.
Death to the Crackberry. Long live the Treo.
It is sad, when the work of technical people with ideas, vision and skills to develope something useful is smashed by these patent-jerks.
It is sad, when the work of technical people with ideas, vision and skills to develope something useful is smashed by these patent-jerks.
Exempting them would set a bad precedent.
If Congress looses access maybe then they would actually see that people are harmed in these cases and go and get some work done to fix the broken patent system and the excessive damage awards being given out all the time.
If they do not also feel the "pain" they will do nothing to prevent this from occuring again in the future.
They can get their e-mails again in 2012 when the patent runs out - it will take them that long to fix the problem anyway.
Tom Philo
http://taphilo.blogspot.com
mark d.
Exempting them would set a bad precedent.
If Congress looses access maybe then they would actually see that people are harmed in these cases and go and get some work done to fix the broken patent system and the excessive damage awards being given out all the time.
If they do not also feel the "pain" they will do nothing to prevent this from occuring again in the future.
They can get their e-mails again in 2012 when the patent runs out - it will take them that long to fix the problem anyway.
Tom Philo
http://taphilo.blogspot.com
mark d.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0738201448/sr=8-1/qid=1140722088/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-5346398-0936950?%5Fencoding=UTF8
However, I shudder to think what the combined force of "the data wants to be free" crowd together with patent trolls would do to the legitimate copyrights of print authors.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0738201448/sr=8-1/qid=1140722088/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-5346398-0936950?%5Fencoding=UTF8
However, I shudder to think what the combined force of "the data wants to be free" crowd together with patent trolls would do to the legitimate copyrights of print authors.
I will be seeking compensation as a direct decendant, but you can pay me now if you use or have used email. This will ensure that you avoid costly court costs on top what you all owe me.
<a href="http://www.hothotshoes.com">Cheap Jordan shoes </a>
<a href="http://www.mytimberlandboots.com">timberlandboots</a>
<a href="http://www.shoppingnikesb.com">Nike SB</a>
<a href="http://www.shoppingtiffany.com/tiffany-rings">Tiffany Rings</a>
<a href="http://www.shoppingnikesb.com">nike dunk sb</a>
I will be seeking compensation as a direct decendant, but you can pay me now if you use or have used email. This will ensure that you avoid costly court costs on top what you all owe me.
- Disaster Recovery, Incident response and security
- by blobree February 23, 2006 12:54 PM PST
- If the blackberrys go away, wonder how many DR plans and incident response plans will have to be changed, how many new models will have to be put in place to replace the technology. How many of us are dependent on this form of communications and will have to buy an ulternative, we all know what happens to our cell phones in a disaster. For someone who does not want to worry about the security risks of using a Windows type device, not many alternatives...
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (57 Comments)