February 13, 2005 9:40 AM PST

Bloggers as news media trophy hunters

With the resignation of CNN's news chief, Eason Jordan, Webloggers have shown their growing influence.
The New York Times

The story "Bloggers as news media trophy hunters" published February 13, 2005 at 9:40 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.

3 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
This is good news for the public
The MSM has had a free reign to selectively report and skew news to fit their agenda for decades now. Finally there's an instrument to monitor them, bloggers. The media, of course, doesn't like this because they've enjoyed relative immunity from scrutiny for years. Sucks to be them. I hope bloggers continue to take the media to task, and if necessary, end careers, until the media shapes up and starts doing its job more responsibly.
Posted by (402 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Media Trophies? Hah!
Media personalities as well as journalists of all levels could not possibly be considered trophies. These ladies and gentlemen are people who have chosen a profession and are getting paid many times very handsomely for their services.

As with any profession there are risks. And with the advent of the new media of the internet, now there are checks and balances that have not been formerly in place.

Despite the reality that everyone is accountable for their actions and words, many people live their lives as if it were not so. Including some of those who earn a living via the MSM (mainstream media).

Bloggers nor the MSM have a monopoly on truth. However, the truth always has a way of coming to the surface and being known. If the use of blogs is bringing the consequences of a person's poor judgement or ammorality upon them in a hastier manner, then so be it.
Posted by Dwight Stickler (8 comments )
Reply Link Flag
How then do we assure accuracy in the media
... if we do not lop some heads off?

There has to be some consequence to spreading a false news story by highly placed people in the media. If the only consequence for a false story is a retraction, then the perpetrator of the falsity has not paid for his "error" or "malicious lies" (you choose which).

Termination of employment is the least one would expect of a news organization for its employees spreading falsehoods as news. That there are no sanctions for the organizations themselves is problematic. There should be some sanction to CNN itself (in the cited incident) for its harboring someone who spread lies as news. Exactly how to do that, I don't know.

JMHO.
Posted by (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

Inside CNET News

1-2 of 12

Scroll Left Scroll Right

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.69%) -89.23 12,801.23
S&P 500 (-0.69%) -9.31 1,342.64
NASDAQ (-0.80%) -23.35 2,903.88
CNET TECH (-0.58%) -11.91 2,032.01
  Symbol Lookup