August 15, 2007 4:00 AM PDT

Big media hunts for Web cred, again

Big media hunts for Web cred, again
Related Stories

What does CBS want with

May 30, 2007

Google makes video play with YouTube buy

October 9, 2006

News Corp. in talks to buy search engine

August 12, 2005
Related Blogs

TreeHugger acquisition confirmed

August 1, 2007

Big-media acquisitions roll on as Hearst snaps up Kaboodle

August 8, 2007

Dodgeball founders quit Google

April 16, 2007
This summer has been an unusual hunting season for the start-up world, with nascent Internet companies firmly in the crosshairs of major media conglomerates.

This month alone, Hearst Publications purchased social-shopping site Kaboodle, The New York Times "absorbed" the Freakonomics blog, and bookmarking start-up Clipmarks was rumored to be in the midst of a deal with Forbes.

In July, cable conglomerate Discovery Communications snapped up eco-blog TreeHugger. And this spring, CBS Interactive acquired both music community and finance video blog Wallstrip.

"Surprisingly, we were in discussions with multiple media companies and not really that much with tech companies for some reason," said Manish Chandra, the founder of Kaboodle.

Sometimes, the motives behind the purchases are ambiguous, but one thing's clear--media companies are forking over amounts of cash in the tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars for Web start-ups that would seem more appropriate targets for a Yahoo or Google.

The big media rush to buy into the Web brings a remarkable sense of deja vu--and skepticism. The common wisdom (based on more than a little evidence, like Time Warner's hugely disappointing acquisition of AOL), ever since the first wave of tech acquisitions in the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, has been that big media doesn't know what to do with its pricey Web acquisitions.

"They have the money available to them today to get deeply involved in the dynamics of this, but they don't for the most part natively understand. They don't understand how Web publishing works," said Alan Mutter, a former newspaper editor and current partner in the Tapit Partners venture capital firm who blogs about the evolution (and often, devolution) of the news media at Reflections of a Newsosaur.

"It's a classic example of how the old media companies have been extremely slow to adapt to the new opportunities posed by (new) technologies. They are trying at a late date to acquire."
--Alan Mutter, blogger, "Reflections of a Newsosaur"

More than a few of the recent acquisitions have so far been letdowns. Conde Nast purchased Reddit last year, only to see the social news site increasingly eclipsed by competitor Digg, which remains independent. According to figures from Internet traffic firm ComScore, Digg pulled in 4,611,000 unique visitors in July while Reddit racked up only 311,000. Both sites are growing rapidly--Digg's unique visitors rose 118 percent from January to July of this year, and Reddit's rose 127 percent--but it's clear that when it comes to size, the two are in different leagues.

Likewise, NBC Universal's purchase of online women's community iVillage, also in 2006, has been rockier than either company would have liked--as was documented by The New York Times in August. The site lost a lucrative contract with Hearst, tie-in television efforts proved fruitless, and in June, fast-growing rival Glam Media surpassed it as the top online women's property for the first time. iVillage has shown signs of progress, as advertising revenues are rising, but it'll be an uphill climb.

Even Fox Interactive Media's $580 million buy of MySpace, which looked like a rock-solid move back in 2005, is showing signs of uncertainty. As rival Facebook continues its meteoric rise, some critics are wondering whether MySpace will turn out to be such a wise investment for News Corp. after all. "I figured the minute Rupert Murdoch bought it it was over, and now all eyes are on, guess what, Facebook," Mutter observed.

But digital media czars like Hearst Interactive Media Group President Kenneth Bronfin argue they know what they're doing this time around. "Within Hearst Interactive Media Group, we have spent the last 10-years-plus investing in venture-backed companies," Bronfin said. "We've invested in over 50 venture-backed companies from way back when, like Netscape, to companies today from Sling Media to Brightcove, so we have a long list of successful businesses that we've invested in where we've been on the board of directors and we've done a lot."

CONTINUED: The built-in audience factor…
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
Hearst Corp., Reddit, iVillage Inc., media company, Digg


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
AOL- Time Warner
Was it not AOL that acquired Time Warner,
as odd as it sounded then and now?
Posted by Sibyl Mediahunter (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
bought TW & lt paid dearly. On some HBO movie credits it says A
AOL Warner bros. movies. Stupid move!
Posted by paulsecic (298 comments )
Link Flag
what can be done
it is sad but no matter the claims the gatekeeper is more powerfull than anyone else.
the political people do not respond, the news media follow in step. they control the issues and the sham that frames them. with this format no one listens and the thoughts are lost.
where is the open forum?
Posted by wheryman (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
conflict of interest
funny that cnet posts this about reddit without disclosing that cnet and are head-to-head rivals, since reddit is now managed out of the wired operation.
not so encouraging, as far as ethics and journalism at cnet goes.
Posted by pardon moi (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.