April 1, 2003 9:00 PM PST

Big-bang project sparks cosmic response

Read more about grid computing

Scientists in Switzerland are building a machine to test the big-bang theory of how the universe began. But first they have to construct a computer network that can handle the volumes of data the device will produce.

The new, more powerful particle accelerator, known as the Large Hadron Collider, is being built at CERN, the same Swiss laboratory where Tim Berners-Lee developed the World Wide Web. With such a tool, scientists say that they will either be able to produce the same particles thought to have existed when the universe was formed, or they will have proved that such particles just don't exist.

But before they can test their theory, the scientists will need a computer network capable of processing and storing the massive amounts of data that will begin spewing from the collider once it starts smashing particles together in 2007. As a result, researchers at CERN created Openlab, a grid computing network designed to test the type of equipment that is likely to be standard by the middle to end of this decade when the project really gets under way.

In grid computing, large numbers of desktop PCs and modestly sized servers are linked across a network in a way that allows them to function as a single, virtual supercomputer.

"The hope is that we, together with partners, solve whatever bugs there are," said Francois Grey, development manager for the Openlab effort.

Grey notes that the particle accelerator is likely to be up and running for a decade, meaning they not only need to predict what will be the latest and greatest technology in 2007, but also which architectures will persevere throughout the life of the project.

The institute's first partners were Hewlett-Packard and Intel, which are delivering Itanium 2-based systems, as well as Enterasys Networks, which is providing 10-gigabit-per-second networking gear. On Wednesday, IBM plans to announce that it is joining the effort, providing six xSeries servers, 20 terabytes of storage as well as IBM's new Storage Tank storage management software.

The computing network is designed to link thousands of scientists who will use the accelerator to try to prove the existence of particles known as Higgs bosons by recreating the conditions thought to have existed shortly after the big bang occurred. Higgs refers to Peter Higgs, the physicist who first theorized the existence of such particles, while bosons refer to the class of particles named for another physicist, S.N. Bose. In any case, Grey said scientists are pretty sure the collider will produce the conditions they need to create the particles, if they exist at all.

"We are talking about, over the span of the project, billions of dollars" of investment, Grey said. "You wouldn't make this investment on a hunch."

A universe of data
The project involves a lot of data, which should provide IBM with fertile ground in which to test Storage Tank, said Jai Menon, an IBM Research Fellow who helped develop the software.

"Where they are really leading edge or bleeding edge is the size of the data the are creating," Menon said. "They are talking about maybe generating 5 petabytes (5 million gigabytes) of data a year once they are up and running."

But even with its large budget, CERN can't build its computing effort from scratch. Indeed, the agency is looking to tap existing computing and storage resources to supply much of the network's capacity.

That is what makes the project interesting to Big Blue, says Tom Hawk, general manager of IBM's grid computing business. CERN's need to find a cost-effective way to manage a massive computing project while using existing computing resources is the same issue that business customers face, Hawk said, adding "not that we aren't really excited about particle physics."

For HP and Intel, the project is a chance to promote the Itanium server chip as the next generation of mainstream server technology. Although many large companies are still testing Itanium-based servers, HP and CERN are betting that they will be far more widespread by the time the particle accelerator is ready.

"Itanium will be mainstream, almost commodity," promised Michel Benard, a Geneva-based manager for HP's university relations program.

Being included in the project is something of a coup, since there are plenty of companies touting their technology as the next big thing, said Charles King, research director of market researcher The Sageza Group in Mountain View, Calif.

"There certainly have been a lot of pretenders to the throne," King said. "The CERN project provides a really interesting crucible of sorts...just being involved in the project is going to be validating to a certain extent."

Plus, King said, IBM and the other participants could not ask for a better testing ground. "It's one thing to do it in your own test lab," he said. "It's another thing to be used by a third party in a pretty hard-core environment where (the technology) is being pushed to its limits."

Even though CERN is just receiving the first of the giant pieces that will form the accelerator, the computing network needs to be built by 2005, Grey said. Although the accelerator will not yet be running, the scientists involved in the project will have to begin checking all of the simulation software they will use to measure and replicate the results produced by the accelerator itself.


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
It would be interesting to find out how the universe was first formed but what happens if somthing goes wrong with the machine or somthing diastrous happens to the planet has anyone thought of these things?
Posted by philLegend25 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
I believe they are going to activate this friggin thing tomorrow. And if it fails, it will create a "stream of unstable black holes inside the earth..." ...so yeah...
Posted by timothycowan43 (1 comment )
Link Flag
Assuming all goes well, and everything works perfectly as it should, we're still not sure you recreated events properly. There are many factors to be considered, such as a lack of gravity, for example. You can't make the experiment perfect, unless you do it in space. Also, if this is to disprove the Bible, I'm afraid it never said that God didn't blow up a huge planet, and then recreate the universe after that. I'm rather aware that the 7 Days of Creation in Genesis are really REcreation. Any scholar will tell you that.

On another note, you are going to collide particles together to see what happens. May I ask a more important question than "Did the Big Bang happen"? Assuming the Big Band DID happen, where did the matter and mass come from that had to explode to start it? Still another thing you'll never know.
Posted by BeyondTenor (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Who is to claim... That we weren't a mistake!?! God Bless" that mistake, however lucky for us/!
We could actually be correcting something that was a mistake!?!. . . Because like they say'' sometimes the elements in which make something so perfect'' are the imperfections~!!!
Posted by TaraDome (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Last time or I should say first time It was switched on there was a earthquake in Bandar Abbas Iran.
They say the earth's magnetic core is going to reverse in the year 2012 the Mayan calender's dooms day prediction?
So do we really want for the to mess with the earth any more than we already have for the curiosity of some scientists?
The money cannot be justified, we should be using the money to save the planet for our
Mother's comment here.
Posted by telesco (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
I think it's a great experiment that we could probably learn alot from but the potential danger is way to much. It scares the frigging shizz out of me. Build a space station very very very far away and do it there. Geeze.
Posted by evette327 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.