March 16, 2006 6:05 PM PST
Banks do battle with debit-card fraud
- Related Stories
-
OfficeMax: No evidence of security breach
March 14, 2006 -
Prosecutor: Debit card crime ring busted
March 13, 2006 -
FBI widens probe of debit-card theft
February 22, 2006
As part of a broader security initiative, Bank of America is offering to alert customers of any suspicious charges or changes to their account via e-mail or text messages almost as soon as they occur.
"We're giving customers more ways to detect fraud and keep an eye on their accounts," Sanjay Gupta, the bank's e-commerce executive, said in a statement. "They can decide what they want to hear about and where they want to be told."
Washington Mutual has also begun offering similar alerts. Both banks were among the scores of financial institutions forced to reissue thousands of debit cards in the past two months after hackers broke into the computer systems of a national retailer and made off with customer data--including PINs.
The robbers stole personal information belonging to as many as 600,000 debit-card holders, according to reports. Victims from numerous U.S. cities filed complaints with police about unauthorized charges being made overseas.
The new alert system could help customers spot fraud early, which is key to preventing big losses.
Bank of America will notify customers about changes to their passwords or when a purchase tops a customer-selected dollar amount. Account holders can receive a daily update of their balance and choose whether the alert goes to their BlackBerry, Treo 650 or office computer.
Similarly, Washington Mutual e-mails customers when changes are made to a customer's home or e-mail address, which could alert an account holder that someone is trying to hijack his or her identity.
A withdrawal that exceeds a certain amount or a balance that falls below a predetermined dollar figure will also trigger Washington Mutual's alert system, said Gary Kishner, the bank's spokesman.
See more CNET content tagged:
Bank of America Corp., fraud, bank, holder, e-commerce
29 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
It's just tiresome and I think banks and merchants are giving security lip service for the most part.
It's just tiresome and I think banks and merchants are giving security lip service for the most part.
Yes it's inconvieneient but I'd rather be safe,
I do not trust e-mails and whoever made that decision at the bank should be fired. DUH!
There has been unusual activity in your bank account. Please phone your local institution for more information.
There should be no invitation to provide any information online like phisher's ask.
Email alerts are better for two reasons: It will be less expensive and it has less chance of slipping through the cracks.
Yes it's inconvieneient but I'd rather be safe,
I do not trust e-mails and whoever made that decision at the bank should be fired. DUH!
There has been unusual activity in your bank account. Please phone your local institution for more information.
There should be no invitation to provide any information online like phisher's ask.
Email alerts are better for two reasons: It will be less expensive and it has less chance of slipping through the cracks.
Once the transaction is completed that information should be destroyed. As POS transactions are approved/disapproved LIVE, there is NO reason for the retailers to have that information stored at all.
I wish people would quit blaming the merchants. The Merchants have been eliminated as the source of the breach according to independent investigations from news releases.
The problem comes from one of the following
It is either the merchant card processor or the card issuer processor.
I still dont know why they are being tight lipped about whos really at fault.
Once the transaction is completed that information should be destroyed. As POS transactions are approved/disapproved LIVE, there is NO reason for the retailers to have that information stored at all.
I wish people would quit blaming the merchants. The Merchants have been eliminated as the source of the breach according to independent investigations from news releases.
The problem comes from one of the following
It is either the merchant card processor or the card issuer processor.
I still dont know why they are being tight lipped about whos really at fault.
Once the transaction is completed that information should be destroyed. As POS transactions are approved/disapproved LIVE, there is NO reason for the retailers to have that information stored at all.
Once the transaction is completed that information should be destroyed. As POS transactions are approved/disapproved LIVE, there is NO reason for the retailers to have that information stored at all.