Automation a bigger deal than offshoring?

"Offpeopling" may be the latest turn of phrase to describe job trends, and it's the focus of a blog launched Friday.

Consultant Richard Samson argues that the replacement of human workers by technology is a bigger deal than the much-publicized offshore trend. And he's turned to the increasingly popular Web log, or blog, medium to share his views.

Dubbed "Automatic Abundance," the blog is slated to provide alerts on topics such as tasks that are shifting to machines, income opportunities that are relatively safe from automation and emerging business ideas consistent with the trend.

"It's happening every day, right before our eyes, but few notice," Samson said in a statement Friday. "A child born today will find very few of today's jobs in the want ads when graduating from college. Most work tasks done now by people will be done by smart technology within 20 or 30 years."

According to the EraNova Institute consulting organization Samson directs, he coined the term "offpeopling" several months ago. But he's not the first to predict the end of work as we know it. Such concerns surfaced during the Industrial Revolution as factory machinery replaced workers, and more recently, authors have published books with titles such as "The Jobless Future."

In the information technology world in particular, the argument has been making the rounds. Last year, an analyst at research firm Gartner predicted that over the next 20 years, changes in computing technology will erase the need for much of the work that employs IT workers today.

By comparison, more attention has been paid in the past few years to offshoring--the shift of high-skilled work such as computer programming from the United States to lower-wage nations like India. The scope and effects of the offshoring trend, however, have been hard to pin down.

Samson is confident that technology is the larger issue. He argues that automatic systems have eliminated most jobs in farming, helped cut manufacturing to less than 17 percent of the nonagricultural work force and are now displacing white-collar workers such as bank tellers. "Offpeopling has much more impact than offshoring or outsourcing," he said. "Yet it's not in the headlines or on TV."

Computers and the like elbowing humans aside isn't necessarily a bad thing, according to Mountain Lakes, N.J.-based EraNova. In fact, it imagines such a change resulting in people shifting to new kinds of work based on their interests rather than on economic necessity.

But if people don't pay attention to the trend, offpeopling could be bad for individuals and the public, Samson suggests. "Those who listen in will avoid huge mistakes and ride the trend to opportunities others will miss," he said in an inaugural blog posting. "Stay tuned."

Say No to Technology! Pity the Horse and Buggy Drivers.

I think it's rediculous to say that technology is getting rid of people. Look at all the IT people and developers that have jobs because of computer technology. The internet is a huge source of jobs. Look at all the technical people, media people, extra sales and marketing people and uses of the internet and you'll see jobs are not in decline because of technology.

True, factories replace jobs that could be done by manual labor, trains have been replaced by cars and planes, and computers have replaced a lot of jobs that needed to be done by hand in the past.

In the future will robots, nano-technology, and AI replace the need for human workers entirely?

Even if technology could do every conceivable task people would still find things to do. People would simply move on to new challenges. Maybe that's when people will start moving to Mars or maybe use technology to develop super powers or who knows? Still, to say technology destroys jobs is short-sighted. Don't go into horse buggying or witch doctoring and you'll be fine. i.e. those that fear and shun technology are the ones who will be replaced by it first.