November 3, 2006 1:16 PM PST becoming the search engine that could

The butler is dead, the name has been tweaked, but executives at would like to remind the world that they are still very much in business.

In fact, they're actually doing pretty well these days.

"We certainly are the underdog. We're certainly living in a Google world," Chief Executive Jim Lanzone said. "But Ask is anything but small compared to the rest of the Web. We're the fourth-ranked search engine and one of the top 10 Web properties."

Just this week, the portal Lycos announced that it had chosen to replace Microsoft for its natural search listings and Google for sponsored listings.

"We selected over other providers because of its great search technology and tools like Zoom-related search, which cannot be found on other engines," Lycos Chief Operating Officer Brian Kalinowski said in a statement on Wednesday.

Once the perennial also-ran, the search site formerly known as Ask Jeeves has undergone a significant transformation over the past two years. Jeeves, the cartoon butler logo, was ousted and the cutesy name was finally streamlined in February. The site also added new features that have earned praise from technology columnists.

While is still a long way from being in the top three of search sites, it's finally making some progress. recently nudged out AOL for the fourth spot among search engines in the U.S., behind Google, Yahoo and Microsoft, according to comScore. ComScore shows Google with a 45.1 percent share in the U.S. in September, Yahoo with 28.1 percent, Microsoft with 11.9 percent, Ask with 5.8 percent and AOL with 5.6 percent. (AOL's search is powered by Google.)

According to Nielsen/NetRatings, Google and are the fastest-growing search engines based on the number of U.S. searches. They showed growth of 24 percent and 19 percent respectively in September, compared with the year before. In market share, Nielsen shows Ask in fifth place, just behind AOL.

"I suspect Ask has a shot at perhaps ousting AOL over time," said Danny Sullivan, editor of Search Engine Watch. "AOL's been dropping, in general, from the figures I've seen, while Ask has stayed steady."

Granted, any rise is big for given its relatively small share. But even a 1 percent gain in market share translates to double-digit percentage growth in revenue, said Lanzone.

"Double-digit market share is a very realistic goal for us," said Lanzone, who was promoted to chief executive in May. "In a year where we've had the toughest critics in the industry, from (Wall Street Journal columnist) Walter Mossberg to (Atlantic Monthly contributor) James Fallows, switch to, we've established our credibility as the most significant challenger (to Google) in the market."

Neither Mossberg in an article in March nor Fallows in October said they were dumping Google. But they did recommend people give the new a try following technology and interface changes made in February when the company changed its name.

They liked's Smart Answers of editorially suggested links; the Zoom feature, which allows people to narrow or broaden a search; the Binoculars feature, which offers a preview of a Web page in the results; the walking directions on the map service; improved image search; and the fact that there are only three ads at the top--fewer than on other search sites.

"Every so often, an underestimated contender rises up to compete with a champion play for play, or even to beat the champ. Something like that is happening in the search business," Mossberg wrote.

Search Engine Watch's Sullivan called engineering "smart, innovative and nimble," and praised the company for not "forgetting search while the others more and more play the portal and content game."

It's starting to look like the Ask acquisition was a good move for InterActiveCorp (IAC), said Scott Devitt, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus.

"The user interface is quite good. The challenge is making a reason for users to switch," he said. "Marginal improvements at Ask don't necessarily shift market share."

IAC, owned by Barry Diller, acquired Ask in March 2005 in a deal then valued at $1.85 billion. This week, IAC posted higher third-quarter profits, and a 62 percent rise in revenue in its media and advertising unit, which includes

IAC shares reached a 52-week high of $32.29 in intra-day trading Wednesday, the day after the company reported earnings, before closing at $31.60. The previous 52-week high was $31.50, set in March.

"We think remains an '07 story, but have been encouraged by market share gains and promotional efforts," Standard & Poor's Equity Research analyst Scott Kessler wrote in a note released on Wednesday.

IAC is integrating content into from its sister sites, including,, Ticketmaster and, said IAC President Doug Lebda. With IAC's backing, has been able to invest in its technology and marketing without having to worry about operating costs, say executives. Thus, the reduction in ads on the search results page.

"We have fewer ads, and the strategy has worked," Lebda said. "While it reduced monetization in the short term, over time--because consumers come back more often--that has made up for it. We have happier consumers, more frequent users and more loyalty," he said.

Lanzone added, "Our approach, to make an analogy, is to sell more copies of the magazine, rather than try to stuff more ads in each copy. That's working for us."

See more CNET content tagged:, Ask Jeeves Inc., IAC/InterActive Corp., search engine, America Online Inc.


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
only real alternative to Google & Yahoo monopolies
If you guys really want an alternative to the Google & Yahoo monopolies it is not Ask, it is this revolutionary new search engine called Anoox

It is simply awesome. If you dont know why, check this out:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>

I must say in 20 years in the IT business I have never seen anything like this Anoox search engine. They are just so radical!
And such a good buy too :)
OTN, our mid size company we have shifted most of
our Advertising to Anoox and as a result we have slightly increased sales, but we have cut the cost of our monthly Ad expenses by like 80%.
But actually there are many other reasons to love Anoox, check out that page I posted above, to see what I mean. I mean if you want to see monopolies loose and people win for a change, you will like them. If however you are beholden to Google or Yahoo, such as Ad sense web master, you wont.
Posted by Sea of Cortez (67 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I'll use AnooX...
...when the results don't need a load page, and aren't 50% porn sites on the first page.
Posted by Tomcat Adam (272 comments )
Link Flag
ASK maps beats google's
I like Ask's waypoint capability for their mapping. I have thought many times when using google maps that I would like to be able to designate my own points on a map route, and now Ask has it. Cool. So maybe they are doing more than just copying the big boys. Maybe they are doing a little bit of leading, and competition is good.
Posted by truks (12 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Not working for Mac/Firefox 2.0 user...
I was geeked when I saw this tidbit, but on OS X 10.4.8 under Firefox 2.0, I can't add a location. No error, just nothing. Safari is worse, it doesn't show the "web 2.0" interface which Firefox shows.

Anxiously awaiting updates to this, though!
Posted by torque2k (1 comment )
Link Flag
Google Follower's new look is the google'ization of search no matter how you spin it.
Posted by marileev (292 comments )
Reply Link Flag
ask ben edelman
how is able to do so well...i think he'll have a story to tell you...

start reading right about here...

<a class="jive-link-external" href="" target="_newWindow"></a>
Posted by jachamp (84 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I think Ask would say
the toolbars are Helpware ;--)
Posted by Buzz_Friendly (74 comments )
Link Flag
A little too late
They could have decrapified a long time ago, but like most million/year execs they couldn't see past the next weeks numbers and "more ads=more money" but only for a short period of time.

Social network sites used to amount to for pay personal sites, but myspace let people collaborate without charging money.

Bandwidth used to be expensive, so most web sites could not afford to offer video downloads without tons of ads, waiting in queues, or for pay members only servers. At some point bandwidth got cheap enough that video downloads didn't require all that crap and Youtube was one of the first to notice.

The established companies mostly lack what it takes to stand back and say "hey, we don't have to crap things up like this anymore"

Take for example free email, that was mostly limited to a criminally insufficient 3 or 5 meg unless you pay for the upgrade until one or 2 people take notice that costs have come down enough to offer a gig of free email.

They major players got lucky with email because you can't take you address with you when you leave, but for most other things it has left the rest of the companies scrambling to stay relevant. is a dinosaur now, and it isn't anyone elses fault but their own. They will need more than just "me too" mentality to get back in.

If you want to know what the next big thing is, say to yourself, what would be popular if you could do it now, but too expensive to offer for free? Think about that, then when that thing gets cheap enough to offer for free be ready for it.
Posted by Dachi (797 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Getting rid of Jeeves? In what logic?
They are paying for getting rid of "Jeeves" personality which
people liked. I still can't believe they removed their own invention
which is hundreds of millions worth.
Posted by Ilgaz (573 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.