- Related Stories
-
Economist explains move to virtual world
September 19, 2007 -
Big-shot economist to advise teen virtual world 'Gaia Online'
September 17, 2007 -
'Second Life': The promise and paradox
August 26, 2007 -
'Second Life,' after the backlash
August 23, 2007 -
Are people more polite in virtual worlds?
August 1, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
Google eyeing its own 'Second Life?'
September 24, 2007
Modeled on flagship store in Milan, virtual store will trade in Linden Dollars, but also link to Armani online shop for non-virtual goods.
The story "Armani opens store in 'Second Life'" published September 26, 2007 at 8:44 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.
- More Hype of useless SL
- If I want to see Armain clothes why would I go to SL to see it!<br />WHY?<br />I would go to Armani Web site, where I can check them in high quality colors and view them in high quality Videos. And all contact info for Armani resellers would be there.<br />Why would anyone possibly go to the herky jerky 3D world of SL, wait 10 mins for it to connect and then wonder around for a low defnition 3D room of Armani!<br /><br />Come on, stop this Hype of SL.
- Like this Reply to this comment
- If the don`t care about getting the items stolen
- Copyright abuse anyone? If anyone been in the game of Second Life will tell you. The stealing copycat issues and LL not supporting creators that have had items stolen is a very big issue! Now if this big named Real Life producer of high end things had any common sence they would have no part of Linden Lab. Why? because anyone that has been part of LL HEY YOU CAN REALLY INCREASE YUR MARKET SHARE WITH SECOND LIFE. Later finds out that they are that minus the cash, after realizing that the island doesnt not pay for itself. On Seond Life people want free things not paying for them. So tell me this why would any smart company like Armani buy in to Linden Lab lies? Why because its only paid advertizing! Linden Lab is being paid by Armani. Its that simple
- Like this Reply to this comment





