Are search results fair game in porn fight?

Federal prosecutors made a request for millions of search records from four major search engines in its defense of a controversial Internet pornography law. The investigation is part of the Bush administration's appeal regarding the Child Online Protection Act. As part of the probe, federal investigators asked for search records from Yahoo, Google, Microsoft and America Online. So far, Google has refused to comply with the government's requests, but Yahoo, AOL and Microsoft have all reportedly complied. Privacy advocates are up in arms over the idea that search results are subject to government perusal. But Yahoo and AOL both insist that, while they complied fully with the feds' request, none of the information handed over was personally identifiable. How much privacy are you willing to give up in the fight to protect children from online pornography? Is there a way to keep porn sites out of children's reach without infringing on the rights of adults?

Tug-of-war between privacy and child protection

FAQ: What does the Google subpoena mean?
CNET News.com

Privacy experts condemn Google subpoena
Reuters

How to foil search engine snoops
Wired

The day after: Points in the search trust sweepstakes
Search Engine Watch

Senators threaten new Net porn crackdown
CNET News.com

Uncle Sam wants your Google searches (and already got results from others)
Techdirt

Editorial | The allure of Google's data
San Francisco Chronicle

Feds take porn fight to Google
CNET News.com

Yahoo admits it let White House access its databases
Times Online

Editorial | Search "privacy"
Detroit Free Press

Moving past Google privacy fears and toward an industry solution
Search Engine Watch

Related audio:

Listen up
News.com reporter Elinor Mills talks with Kurt Opsahl of the Electronic Frontier Foundation about privacy and the government's Google request.