October 26, 2004 12:55 PM PDT
Apple unveils color iPod, U2 edition
- Related Stories
-
Older iTunes versions being shut out, Apple warns
October 21, 2004 -
Photo 1 of 3: New designs for iPod?
October 18, 2004 -
Apple event could bring iPod news
October 18, 2004 -
U2 pitches for Apple
October 12, 2004
The color model can also be used to display photos, either on its own screen or on a TV set. It comes in two capacities: a 40GB model for $499 and a 60GB version for $599. The screen is capable of displaying 65,536 colors.
"Photos are a lot like music," iPod unit head Jon Rubinstein said in an interview. "Everybody loves them, and you've got a lot of your own content. It's just kind of a natural (pairing)."
The U2-themed iPod holds 20GB, is black with a red navigation dial on the face and includes a facsimile of the band members' signatures on the back. For $349, or $50 more than the cost of the regular 20GB iPod, the buyer receives a $50 coupon that can be used toward purchasing "The Complete U2" music collection, priced at $149, from Apple's iTunes store.
Apple also announced that, starting today, its iTunes Music Store will be available in more countries--namely Austria, Belgium, Finland, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Jobs also said Apple would add a Canadian store next month.
Apple said it has started shipping the iPod Photo to stores and that it is expected to be available soon, while the U2 iPod is due in mid-November.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs acknowledged that the Mac maker continues to buck conventional wisdom, not having added video capabilities along with the photo playback. In order to keep the iPod small, Apple needed to keep to a small screen size--one that doesn't work for watching a movie, Jobs and Rubinstein maintain.
"No one has any video content to put on them, and even if they did, the screens are much too small," Jobs said, adding that the iPod is the "wrong place" for video.
"Looking at photos on here is a reasonable thing to do," Rubinstein added, holding up one of the new gadgets. "Watching a video makes no sense."
![]()
Steve Jobs, CEO, Apple, and U2 band members
Matt Sargent, an analyst at market research firm Current Analysis, said the iPod Photo makes it easier for people to move their digital photos around. But, he said, "the question is, is that something Middle America wants to do?"
The iPod Photo is also pricey. Still, Sargent said, "Apple has always managed to take that concern and blow it away."
In addition to the new iPods, Apple also introduced a set of colored "socks" for carrying iPods. Apple will sell a set of six differently hued socks for $29.
Before showing off the new iPods, Jobs noted that Apple will open its London retail store on Nov. 20 and also predicted strong iMac sales this quarter.
"We think this is going to be a very good Christmas for the iMac," Jobs said.
60 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
Apple will add video when it becomes practical, not before,
probably 2006.
Love the new version of iTunes (4.7) that also sync's your
photo's. Compatible with Adobe Photoshop Elements and Adobe
Album (I believe) on Windows. You can carry thousands of
photo's and play slideshows, on a standard or HD Television -
WITH MUSIC - with the new iPod photo - ******* excellent!
Now, what was it I want for Christmas, hmmm. Apple has raised
the bar. No looking back now.
...Which according to Steve Jobs will be...NEVER!
BTW, the video player in the PMC works just fine, there's nothing wrong with it (yes, it supports MPEG).
IF Apple comes out with a video player, it won't be iPod, thats for sure!
I haven't used the portable MediaCenter yet, but I do have a full-sized one at home. So long as it is sitting on XP, then the iPod is still a very limited product in comparison.
Heres a link: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/default.mspx" target="_newWindow">http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/default.mspx</a>
-These threads are becoming lame. Seems like mostly 12 year olds these days or at least that level of intelligence.
digital information with you or to a new destination. (i.e. digital
music/MSWord-Excel-Powerpoint-etc data files, back up files &
NOW digital photos too...)
What if you wish to take numerous digital photos to gramma's
house for them to see all at once? (I.E. over the Holidays...)
NOW you can with the iPOd Photo by Auto-Sync & Plug+Play via
dock into their large TV screen with music in a slideshow.
OR take your digital camera with small memory chip or take your
laptop & plug into TV or share small LCD with family.
PLUS, business travelors can take photos of projects with them.
Take family albums & play slideshow of family while flying
during business trip.
use iPOD Photo as an external hard drive storage during long
vacations with your digital camera & card reader...
Think Different + enjoy!
-Eyes wide open in Seattle-
Apple has made it so easy to manage your digital photos..
people who never considered it as a hobby are joyfully filling
their computers with thousands of photos. It would be great to
show them off on my iPod...as opposed to opening my 12inch
powerbook.
"A bit late in the game." The iPod wasn't exactly the first MP3
player out there either. Why has it been so sucessful? Because
consumers decided it was the best MP3 player.
However, I am not sure this is something people want...
Perhaps it would be more appealing if owners could send the picture to another iPod wireless... Photo sharing.
Personally, I like the idea of video on an iPod. You could buy the music video that goes with the song and listen and watch at the same time... that could be cool...
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://allwaysmusic.modblog.com/" target="_newWindow">http://allwaysmusic.modblog.com/</a>
Still, the new photo iPod's will kick a**.
Too many 12 year olds that haven't learned to read thoroughly.
attempting to imitate & replicate the "next iPod Killer"?
No, Apple did not invent the MP3 player, but they did perfect it &
carve out a new niche, as well as, being first to put together
huge Music Studio deals to create a LEGAL online download
store that is huge around the world... For PC/Win & Mac.
-Eyes wide open in Seattle-
Maybe cuz it's been out for 2 years and still isn't a threat?
All in all its go what I'm looking for in a music player.
1. Solid battery life if we are to believe the 15 hour specs. (Even if its only 10 that's DAMN good.)
2. Displays cover art. (Not that big of a deal but its one of those nice touches.)
3. Space for my entire collection AND some room to grow.
The picture feature? Its nice. I will use it since I'm a shutterbug. But its simply icing on the cake at this point. The main attraction was the 60GB drive. I think Apple has a winner on its hands but it NEEDS to get a 60GB iPod down into the $500 range in the next 6 months. If that means placing it into a B&W iPod so be it. But its a foregone conclusion that others will (If they haven't already.) follow with cheaper 60GB players.
All I know is the 1-2 week delivery time is going to feel like 1-2 months. :-)
PS- The only Apple product I've ever owned was/is a Newton. Still use it. So don't give me this Apple zealot crap. K?
you are reading about APPLE products...
(Windows / Intel / Dell / WinTelDell)
Follow the money my friend & you will find the
truth...DeepThroat
-Eyes wide open in Seattle-
single track from services like the iTunes Music Store. But, I
agree, it would be nice to have liner notes as well. And I think
this being a digital (think dynamic) medium opens up a world of
opportunity, like animated album art, or links to discographies,
etc. from within the liner notes.
Its the whole K.I.S.S. methodology. This is why the iPod has succeeding where others failed. Its does a very small handful of things well instead of trying to be jack of all trades. You are looking for this capability. That's great. Do you have any idea how much bulk would be added to the iPod to put a USB controller chip in it? Seriously. I would love to know. It's already at .75 of an inch. Would you prefer a solid 1" of bulk? I'm pretty sure those who want just a music player would not be happy in that regard.
Would this be a nice feature? Obviously. But not at the cost of bulking the thing up. I'm already reading plenty of complaints by Apple users who are ******** about the increase in size from the B&W to the color iPod. I can't imagine what they would say if it was .85"-1" thick.