March 3, 2005 2:52 PM PST
Apple has Intel inside--sort of
- Related Stories
-
IDF: Exec says U.S. schools lacking
March 3, 2005 -
Apple says could move to Intel, but happy with IBM
November 5, 2003 -
Apple upgrades servers, unveils storage
February 10, 2003
For a long time, people have suggested that Apple make its Mac OS X operating system work with Intel chips. While the Mac maker has not done so, it has used Intel processors in one of its recent products--the Xserve RAID storage system.
Intel included one of the rack-mounted storage systems in a display at this week's Intel Developer Forum here. The device sat in a rack, surrounded by products from more familiar Intel customers such as IBM and Dell.
According to Intel marketing materials, the Xserve RAID uses Intel's IOP 331 chip, a derivative of the XScale processor. The IOP chip, which is used in many storage systems, is designed to speed the task of shuttling data in and out of a computer system.
The use of an Intel chip does not appear to be part of a broader trend, however. Apple has resisted demands to move away from the PowerPC chips made by IBM and Freescale Semiconductor.
As recently as last month, Apple Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer reiterated that Apple has no plans to offer Mac OS X on anything other than the kinds of chips it currently uses. In the past, CEO Steve Jobs has said that such a move is technically feasible, but not something the company has seen a need to do.
An Apple representative was not immediately available for comment.
20 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
different tipes of chips.
This noticce from Intel appears to me like trying to "get Intel-
brand inside" the Apple halo.
The same is for the "concept" mini Intel... a plastic box to be
deliver in two years... against an actually delivering product.
different tipes of chips.
This noticce from Intel appears to me like trying to "get Intel-
brand inside" the Apple halo.
The same is for the "concept" mini Intel... a plastic box to be
deliver in two years... against an actually delivering product.
completely non-functional and now some spin about using a
communications chip from Intel. These poor bastards are
desperate.
completely non-functional and now some spin about using a
communications chip from Intel. These poor bastards are
desperate.
inacurate, yet another news.com story that starts with a
sensational headline and waters the claim down in the body of
the story. Why not try: reporting the facts?
inacurate, yet another news.com story that starts with a
sensational headline and waters the claim down in the body of
the story. Why not try: reporting the facts?
CNET are grabbing at straws with this article!
CNET are grabbing at straws with this article!
Are you & that fearfull of people possibly switching to Apple / IBM PowerPC / MacOSX OR Linux / AMD64? (i.e. abandon the WintelDell cartel monopoly & your biggest advertisers)
Wow!
Intel/IBM/AMD/APPLE are all great professional companies that are doing their best to advance technologies around the world.
Maybe, some day, CNET will be in that list of "professionals" as well...
so they write dumb stories, and we're suckered into reading and talking about them. who's smart now?
Are you & that fearfull of people possibly switching to Apple / IBM PowerPC / MacOSX OR Linux / AMD64? (i.e. abandon the WintelDell cartel monopoly & your biggest advertisers)
Wow!
Intel/IBM/AMD/APPLE are all great professional companies that are doing their best to advance technologies around the world.
Maybe, some day, CNET will be in that list of "professionals" as well...
so they write dumb stories, and we're suckered into reading and talking about them. who's smart now?