An early peek at Longhorn

(continued from previous page)

in October 2003. At the time, the company focused largely on the "under the hood" features of the OS--in particular, a new file system, Web services architecture and the presentation system.

Since then, Microsoft has significantly reshaped the OS. Last year, the company announced that it would pull out the new file system and that the Web services and presentation pieces would also be made available for Windows XP.

Got to know when to hold 'em
Allchin said his priority is making sure Longhorn meets quality standards, followed by getting the product out on schedule. Packing it full of features is a third priority, and the one most likely to give. As a result, Microsoft would delay Longhorn over quality concerns, but is unlikely to let individual features hold up its release. That could mean some further trimming around the edges if things fall behind.

As with Windows XP Service Pack 2, security remains at the forefront of Microsoft's development efforts. With Longhorn, Microsoft isn't focusing as much on building in antivirus software as it is changing the behaviors that leave computer systems vulnerable to attack. For example, most computers today are run in administrator mode, making it easy to add new programs and make other changes, but also allowing major fundamental changes to a computer to be made by malicious software.

With Longhorn, Microsoft is trying to change that so a computer runs with the least possible permission level. Only those programs that truly need administrator privileges would run at that level. Microsoft plans a similar change to Internet Explorer that would reduce the level of access given to external Web sites in an attempt to lessen the possibility of malicious attacks.

Microsoft also has focused on improving the experience when using a laptop computer. A fast-start option, combined with support for external displays, will make it easier to create computers that can display calendar information or play music without having to start up the whole PC, including the OS. Another change will make it easier for a person's PC to join a network at work or at home, while remaining invisible to other machines when getting Wi-Fi at a coffee shop.

In the category of making sure things "just work," Allchin cited enhancements such as making sure that a laptop that connects to a projector displays correctly without having to press any keys. In addition, he said, are settings tailored for specific tasks, such as watching a DVD. The computer will just assume that the user doesn't want the movie muted and probably wants to watch it full-screen.

Getting down to business
If there is more than one PC in a home network, Allchin said, it will be easy to allow sharing of files and easy to get at those files. For example, a PC with Longhorn might show all the music files together, whether they are on the local PC or another machine on the network.

There are also features designed to make it easier on businesses that use large numbers of Longhorn machines. Microsoft has created a new way for companies to put their custom installation of the OS onto a group of new machines.

Allchin said those enhancements--along with a reduction in the number of times customers have to reboot their machines and other features--will mean that companies that move to Longhorn will be able to cut their operating costs. Of course, he added, "that's up to us to prove."

Microsoft is also crafting its preliminary list of which capabilities a computer will need to run Longhorn. Allchin said the company is recommending that systems have 512MB of memory, as well as "today's level" of processor. There will be different levels of display quality depending on how much graphics horsepower a computer has.

The richest view, code-named Aero Glass, sports the fanciest bells and whistles, such as translucent windows that come to life when opened or maximized. That's where the heftiest graphics requirements come in, but Allchin said recent tests show it might not require as much horsepower as originally thought.

Another view, Aero, will have slightly lower requirements and offer many, but not all, of the features. Finally, a minimal user interface will look fairly similar to current versions of Windows.

Allchin said the company is continuing to tinker with different interfaces and their requirements, "but clearly we want as many machines as possible to have Aero Glass because there is a lot more we can do in that."

What a great propaganda puff piece

Longhorn...Longwait...Shorthorn...who cares? Thanks for this
useless piece, Cnet. By the way, Apple already offers visual icons
for files and ways to view folder contents without opening them.

It would have been just swell if you could have elaborated on
Allchin's claim that Longhorn lets do more with search results
than OS X, but that must be asking too much of a news site like
yours. Errmm...you are a news site, right?

Say, is this enhanced search feature going to actually make into
Longhorn, or is it being introduced piecemeal, delayed
indefinitely, or just dreamed about?

Allchin says that his top three priorities are:
1. Quality standards for Longhorn
2. Getting it out on schedule
3. Packing it full of features

It's all about SECURITY, STUPID. So nice to see that this OS won't
ship with full privileges enabled as the default. Nice to see that
Allchin et al put that dollar to good use and actually bought a
clue.

Overall, your article offers no critique, little background and no
insight as to the final feature set or actual ship date of
Longhorn. I hope MS paid Cnet well for this two-page
advertisement.

Hmm fast searching

Ok the fast search is already implemented for ex in your favorite *nix or linux. Now I'm quite curious how they are going to implement a fast and helpful search without having to update a database that takes minutes.

I'm looking forward to Longhorn to see how many 'innovations' they copy from various other systems *cough*Linux and Mac*cough* .

The pricetag will be interesting IMHO too.

[Filip Remplakowski]

Have you ever noticed...

how cnet is always critical when apple does something, but
when microsoft basically copies everyone (well copies at an
inferior level) they are praised to no end. Under every
"innovation" you should write where they got that from, like in a
formal essay. All i know is tiger is going to shred that bovine
embryo to bits.

[201293546946733175101343322673]

So Mr. Jobs is not doing his "propaganda" about OS X?

What an interesting double-standard :)

Innovative

Ok so the linux KDE desktop does the document-preview thingy since version 1(?). Of course if you point to the icon you get a bigger preview. Of course it works for sound files aswell. So when will micro$oft innovate that into longhorn too? I know that Micro$oft stole the GUI from apple but geez how much longer are they willing to copy(steal) Mac? They should try to copy(steal) stability not eyecandy.

[mortis9]

pathetic mac fiends

incase you don't know: the gui was created at Xerox. The mac 'innovator' who 'created' it, happened to visit Xerox labs and have hands on experience with their version of the gui, prior to joining apple. Linux is nowhere near where it would need to be for your average user to replace windows with it. I'm sure none of you no this, but most people with computers don't know the first thing about recompiling their rpm's or anything that even looks text based. While apple has taken this into concern, writing an operating system that only has to run on systems they control every aspect of, isn't nearly so daunting a task as writing one that will need to be functional on nearly every piece of computer hardware in circulation.

Funny

You have to admit it's kinda funny to read a story about Longhoen and have a bunch of Linux and Mac people say how their OS is better. It is like a religion or something.

[orfeu_niko]

It is not funny

They present yhings that Linux has (don't know Apple) as inovations. That's not correct. It's like saying that Mozilla/Forefox inovated the tab browsing. Opera haded it for so long! And so it had Pop-up blocking. I used Opera just for those resons.In rest I'm not a linux fanatic. I use windows when is fit, or linux when that is fit. Apple is not an option since I don't have any special use for it. I was actually looking for Longhorn, to see what they come up with, but it seems more and more like they are playing catch up than leading. And they are catching up to KDE(maybe GNOME, don't like it, don't know), not Apple(I don't knwo anything about Apple so I can't make any statemant here).
Hopefully they will make something nice. After all, if I want eye candy I use KDE(3.4 is nice), but windows I don't use for the interface, but for the applications I can run on it. So I hope it will be a good operating system. Let's stop about inovating, and just make it work.Apple users won't buy it if it doesn't say inovation near it, but, after all, they don't really matter. They just make a lot of noise.

[JuggerNaut]

Religion???

Hmmm... so if a Mac or Linux user says their OS is better, it somehow equates to a religion? What if a Windows user says their OS is better, is it just the plain and simple truth and there's no need to argue with it??!

It's sad that Windows users and the tech pundits who preach the Microsoft gospel have to resort to name calling like the use of the word 'cult' or 'religion' because they don't understand why people don't conform to the supposed norm of a computer society driven by IT bureaucracy!

[201293546946733175101343322673]

Because Linux users are Sore Losers

Enough Said :)

[26242]

Linux IS a religion

I've often thought that too. It really is. You're either a Mac guy, a Windows guy, or a Linux guy or a n00b :)

I myself, am a Linux guy

Long live the penguin!

Mac is linux

Well, sought of, Unix to be more exact. Mac to me is more like what gnome and kde is to linux, a desktop manager. Since the underlining muscle is BSD (unix base) it stands closer to every linux, unix system out there. On the matter of windows now changing their icons with a shot of what's inside, mac and linux have already passed that stage. And it just seems to me some of the features that are mentioned in the article is just copies of current stuff that's already out there, but that's just Microsoft.

[orfeu_niko]

Don't say that

They'll kill you!
The Aplle engineeres worked day and night to write it from scratch. And Steve Jobs was always there confirming every line of code!!!
How dare you!!

[mpotter28]

2006?

Longhorn seems to be an indication that there are massive mangement problems at microsoft. From everthing I read , Microsoft has really good tech people but they haven't met a deadline in how many decades. If the tech people are as good as I think it means that the upper management at Microsoft is messing up somehow and making it impossible for the worker bees to deliver the goods. If they want to keep their position on the razor's edge they had better fix things so they can deliver a product in a timely manner

[PolarUpgrade]

The goal is not delivery

It is evident that MS is a highly competent firm; therefore, it is also evident that product delays are by design. Preannouncement serves the function of encouraging customers to wait for the next big MS thing rather than buy say a Macintosh in the interim.

It is possible that MS is COMPLETELY ON SCHEDULE with Longhorn, being market-dominant enough to hold off on its intro until the revenue stream is really needed.

Either my thesis is correct or MS is in serious trouble business-wise.

[PolarUpgrade]

Beware the hidden "advantages"

There are advantages to Longhorn that indeed are not much heeded. Like the potential for a new file system to make existing apps eligible for expensive replacement. Or the opportunity to buy new video cards to support the new colorful interface.

The new video card opportunity is a plus point, since with new card slot standards coming this will feature will also afford many the opportunity to buy a whole new PC just to acces the new glorious video.

Oh sure, there will be backward comptibility to some extent, just like Win 3.1 apps ran great (Not!) on Win 95.

Of course when we have this grand opportunity to buy a new PC we will also get Longhorn with, too. An extra bonus.

And yet despite these overwhelming plusses, Microsoft still has to convince the market that Longhorn is a great economic benefit for the users and not just for Microsoft.

The firm is bringing on Longhorn after a long period when it has short-shrifted the home users who used to drive new waves of PC adoption. MS has skewed the game market towards separate pricey game consoles, for example, completely eroding the need for middle clas home users to rebuy big expensive PCs so the kids can play on.

And with Product Activivation MS has destoyed the economic equation that made the PC feasible in the home in quantity, and in terms of the the value of rebuying new PCs frequently, since the software can't be repurposed and neither MS software costs nor the OS cost can any longer be amortized over several home PCs.

The prospect of web-centric perpetual-pay .NOT (er .Net, sorry) apps will not help either.

Small wonder that the consumers that drove MS's success are now focussing on driving iPods and Macs instead. And on HDTV etc.

But hardly on MS and its products at all any more.

[Buzz_Friendly]

you are right but......

this is the same old story I heard with Windows 98, ME, W2K WXP and now Longhorn and I will bet it will ring again when something after Longhorn comes on the scene. People won't buy it at first then sooner or later the assimilation process will take hold much like XP. Oh well now to get my ATI drivers installed in Ubuntu.

Always running as root...

Thank goodness Longhorn won't "suggest" that one run as root.
Now to convince the 3rd party developers to jump on board
*cough* ADOBE *cough*.

In WinXP, the default user runs as root (and hence so do all the
apps he runs). Opening a command prompt and deleting the
contents of C: is fun, whether you do it or that script you just
downloaded does it. So MS puts up "armed guards" around the
perimeter, to shoot down any intruders (ie viruses, spyware).
Works great. Right.

Instead of having any armed guards, why not put the stuff you're
protecting in a safe. No more armed guards required.

Microsoft will tout this new "minimal permissions feature" in
Longhorn as INNOVATIVE! Its been around for 30+ years.

0 length passes

Will MS enforce passwords like other OS-es? I mean it's all fine and dandy if you can put an empty password.

[mariusthull]

I'd have to agree

3rd party software really needs to change. As an example: I built my current computer using a MSI Neo2 board. As with most motherboards like this it came with utilities that keep the bios updated as well as monitor cpu and system temp, that sort of thing. Wanting to do things right, when I reformatted and reinstalled Windows XP I set it up so there are root and user accounts.
I installed all the utilites as root. Now when I log into the user account I have to click through a bunch of windows telling me drivers weren't loaded, handlers weren't loaded, my motherboard isn't supported so on and so forth. I don't get any of that as root.
You can blame windows and or microsoft for a lot of problems but something like this isn't one of them.

[sanenazok]

So you want transparent windows

Download a program called "iconoid", I've been using it on a P4-M 2002 laptop and it has worked like a charm. No 128MB of video memory required.

Aero/Aero Glass & AGP Requirement

Hmm ... one thing I can't understand is why they are saying that there is a need specifically for an AGP card to run the Aero or Aero glass. Me hopes that this is a 'soft restriction' (i.e. you can still chosse your setting on your own, although they might engage some warning dialogue) rather than hard reinforced (i.e. won't let you select Aero glass if you have a PCI card) deal.

Just to get all personal: I, for example, have a newly purchased Dimension 3000 (dell). 3ghz processor, 1gig RAM, but, as with all Dimension 3000 systems, only PCI. (Thanks Dell). Now, Microsoft is telling me that my PCI card -- the best one available, a 256MB GeForce FX5700LE heavily overclocked -- won't be able to handle Aero Glass?

Not understanding why, and praying for soft restrictions.

There are going to be a LOT of angry and relatively computer unsavvy customers calling up Microsoft in about a years time from now if MS doesn't figure a way out to make kosher the whole PCI / new OS apperance thing. Can you imagine a million soccer moms calling up MS tech support to find out why the new Microsoft 'Cow' Operating System they installed on their 1-year-old Dells looks nothing like their neighbor's new 'Cow' Operating System even though they have similar computers?

Plus, there will be that tiny but vocal subset of the population (specifically me) who know that their computers could run things just fine with a PCI card. I'm sorry, but there's no way that the interaction layer of an OS could be any more taxing, Aero glass or no Aero glass, than the most recent games out on the mkt right now.

AH, please let this work out, O Great Bird of the Galaxy

[rdean]

Allchin is wrong...

"But while the OS bears plenty of similarities to Tiger, Allchin stressed that Microsoft has broken new ground in Longhorn. For example, document icons are no longer a hint of the type of file, but rather a small picture of the file itself. The icon for a Word document, for example, is a tiny iteration of the first page of the file."

Depends on how you define "breaking new ground". Linux desktops running Gnome have displayed files like this for years. True to Microsoft form, their definition of "innovation" is taking an established idea and running it on Windows.

No, no, you miss the genius!

Marketers love to use your own assumptions against you--or I should say, the assumptions of those who don't know the industry against them. It doesn't work very well against us.

You see, MS really isn't lying. These are all innovations and have broken new ground. They just aren't innovations or ground broken by Microsoft--they left that part out.

It's like a supermarket I used to work for--they liked to advertise some items at the regular price. People assume because a price is listed in the ad that it is lower than a regular price. But sale prices aren't always lower.

Of course, you have to be working with the items all the time to notice.

We have truth in advertising--we just don't have the whole truth in advertising. It's more effective that way.

Wow, sound like features linux has had for years!

See subject. I'm running the latest iteration of debian. Aside from having to spend ten minutes being sure I had drivers, the experience of using linux is far simpler and much more satisfying. I would choose linux and apple osx over longhorn, or anything that ms has to offer, any day.

[201293546946733175101343322673]

Good for You

Keep living in your Linux cage (or cave for that matter) and dream on :)

Sounds like OS X... almost.

No wonder it's been delayed. They needed to get their hands on
OS X first to see what an OS should be.

[201293546946733175101343322673]

No No No

They need to find out what ideas Apple has been stolen from them, then they can come up with even newer ideas :)

[Llib Setag]

Pathetic Lack Of History Knowledge PC wannabe.

Yes XEROX PARC invented a "crude" version of the GUI point &
click, pull down menu system. NOBODY wanted it & could not
see any use for this "mouse & GUI".
Offered to HP: NO
Offered to IBM: NO
Jobs & Woz visited PARC & were fascinated by this innovated,
abeit "crude" at the time. XEROX R&D did not want it either.

Apple PAID for this in Apple stock to Xerox.
Apple thenrefined & polished the GUI & mouse action to
revolutionized the personal computer industry with "point &
click, drag & drop, copy & paste" all with a new & updated
polisdhed & elegant GUI.
MS DOS was doomed & Citizen Gates knew it. That's why they
developed the first version of Excel & Word for the Mac GUI /
platform.
That's also where they had the opportunity to "sample" (i.e.
steal) the GUI. GUI could not be trademarked as intellectual
propery, only the codes behind them could.
Windows was born out of sheer envy & greed of MS stealing the
GUI from Apple.
Mac were born out of seeing a visionary way to create a better
human computer interface that started from the seeds of Xerox
PARC, that everyone thought was worthless (except for two TRUE
visonaries...Jobs & Woz).
Get the facts Jack...

Right.

And if I've got my timing right, this all happened before software became patentable rather than just protected under copyright. Thus, the concept of the GUI could not be made protected IP.

[Llib Setag]

Pathetic PC wannabes...

Yes XEROX PARC invented a "crude" version of the GUI point &
click, pull down menu system. NOBODY wanted it & could not
see any use for this "mouse & GUI".
Offered to HP: NO
Offered to IBM: NO
Jobs & Woz visited PARC & were fascinated by this innovated,
abeit "crude" at the time. XEROX R&D did not want it either.

Apple PAID for this in Apple stock to Xerox.
Apple then refined & polished the GUI & mouse action to
revolutionized the personal computer industry with "point &
click, drag & drop, copy & paste" all with a new & updated
polished & elegant Apple GUI.
MS DOS was doomed & Citizen Gates knew it. That's why they
developed the first version of Excel & Word for the Mac GUI /
platform. (can't drag & drop in DOS...no GUI)
That's also where they had the opportunity to "sample" (i.e.
steal) the GUI. GUI could not be trademarked as intellectual
propery, only the codes behind them could during that time
period.)
Windows was born out of sheer envy & greed of MS stealing the
GUI from Apple.
Mac were born out of seeing a visionary way to create a better
human computer interface that started from the seeds of Xerox
PARC, that everyone thought was worthless (except for two TRUE
visonaries...Jobs & Woz).

Get the facts Jack...

Just leeches

Looks like it's just another technology leeching that you always see. Stealing innovation and creativity from *nix.

[Catgic]

Techno-Man Does Not Live by Engineering Alone

Techno-man does not live by engineering alone, but by all that marketing can promise the customer-client, and with luck engineering can deliver just a few weeks, months or years behind schedule.

Read ?Em and Weep, Apple Vegans and Penguin Carnivores. Bronco Billy and his Redmond Rascals are cutting everyone off at Longhorn Pass. A S/W release and scheduled delivery promise is a promise to be cyber-broken by M$. Elegant FILE SYSTEM?maybe next time around S/W Fans?and on and on.

I?m a fallen MACintosh True Believer who got left in the S/W apps availability dust with a pile of not so useful MAC OS-driven H/W I had to trade in for MS DOS-driven PCs to keep my clients happy, and my bottom-line in the BLACK. I haven't looked back since.

ALL HAIL THE WOZ-STER?YES!!!...because the Woz-ster's Apple-Mac OS rules as the best collegial partnership between man and machine to date. ALL HAIL JOBS?!? Whatzup wit dat??? Jobs was great for OFF-SITE week-end "Religious Retreats," covered on 60 Minutes, but never really LOVED US the Monday morning that followed.

The same malady affected MAC ?Visionaries? who had a technically superior MAC OS and DRI-DOS ?Visionaries? with their technically superior CP/M-based PC DOS. They all were blinded by GO-GO EIGHTIE$ GREED I$ GOOD, and contract red-lining, fine-print reading Corporate Lawyers. They all got THEIR?$ in spite failing against desktop sleeping bespectacled Billy the Kid, sans lawyers. Billy Got His "All Rights Reserved To Microsoft" IBM PC M$ ?Bugware? DOS Contract. The corner-office heavies at Apple and DRI STILL GOT THEIR'$ whilst we Faithful Techno-Purists got left holdin' & eatin' the Apple-Digital Core seeds & all, and GOT OURS IN THE WRONG END. Funny thing, it didn?t feel like ?SOFT? WARE to me.

Check out MAC OS vs. M$ OS vs. Other Stuff OS Market Share here in Y2K + 5, and READ ?EM & WEEP Techno-Market players and IT purveyors. The TECHNO ?Bottom Line? is the BIZ BOTTOM LINE. Please, no...Yabbut-but-but-t-t Apple has iPOD...iPOD is a soon to be waning Flavor-Of-The-Month...and Pengie is soon to go the way of Batman & Robin. We UNWASHED, out here in the e-Hinterlands, won?t be doing the Penguin SOFT[ware] Shoe Shuffle to MAC delivered I-Tunes, but rather will still be dancing to Bronco Billy?s Longhorn Doesy-Do.

I and my System Software Mates are anxiously awaiting delivery of our copies of Longhorn Beta 1, currently ?promised? this Summer of 2005. B-)

[orfeu_niko]

Good point

You put it very well. I myself am a Linux user, but it is not out of believe, only that what I need works better in Linux. Sometimes I see a Mac fan, and I don't want to be like them. They think defferent. Fanatics are the wordt thing that can happen to a something. I imagine them with Steve Jobs posters in their bedrooms. And they mostly come at night.Mostly.

[201293546946733175101343322673]

Engineers do not know how to write

Just read that comment above :)

[montgomeryburns]

Fire Molly Wood

Fire Molly Wood

[201293546946733175101343322673]

Fire Monty Burns

Fire Monty Burns

[hatandglasses13]

Are you KIDDING me?

Quote from the article:
"But while the OS bears plenty of similarities to Tiger, Allchin
stressed that Microsoft has broken new ground in Longhorn. For
example, document icons are no longer a hint of the type of file,
but rather a small picture of the file itself. The icon for a Word
document, for example, is a tiny iteration of the first page of the
file. Folders, too, show glimpses of what's inside. Such images
can be rather small, but they offer a visual cue that aids in the
searching process, Allchin said."

HA!!! That's a NEW feature for Windows? Guess what, I have Mac
OS X Panther (the currently available version) and it ALREADY
does that with... get this... MICROSOFT WORD documents!
Already have a little icon showing me a preview of the
document. And this is the best thing CNET could come up with
as a new special feature for Longhorn? Give me a break!

[201293546946733175101343322673]

You are KIDDING yourself

So you are very willing to spend your hard earned $$ to the greedy Mr. Jobs & company to prove you have cash to burn. Points well taken :)

[hatandglasses13]

Greedy?

What the hell does "greedy Mr. Jobs" have to do with this? That is
an incredibly naive reply. I won't even debate whether or not Mr.
Jobs OR Mr. Gates is "greedy," since that is irrelevant and quite
frankly makes no sense.

I would rather spend my hard earned money on a reliable,
productive, and user friendly operating system than waste it on
an unintuitive operating system that does not support the
leading creative professional software titles, better yet on a
company that makes false claims about its products.

Is it worth it to be constantly frustrated and unhappy with an
incapable computer that I will have for YEARS just to save a few
hundred dollars? Guess what, no.

[Bobman]

lets see...

"...operating system that does not support the
leading creative professional software titles..."
Are you saying that theres no Windows versions of Adobe CS? Or no Windows version of Macromdia programs either? Guess again, because those are the leading creative professional software titles.

Oh, and by the way, my windows computer is "reliable, productive, and user friendly" I can get all the work done that I need to without crashing or haveing any problems. And as far as a user friendly interface goes, I CANT STAND Mac OS X's interface. Windows is just fine for me.

"...an incapable computer..."
Theres nothing useful your Mac can do that my PC can't.