December 11, 2006 4:28 PM PST
Alleged NASA hacker's appeal set for New Year
- Related Stories
Another suspected NASA hacker indictedDecember 1, 2006
Security from A to Z: HackersNovember 27, 2006
Security from A to Z: ExtraditionNovember 27, 2006
Kevin Mitnick, the great pretenderJune 14, 2006
Alleged NASA hacker loses extradition rulingMay 10, 2006
NASA hacker case adjourned over extradition fearsFebruary 16, 2006
Gary McKinnon: Scapegoat or public enemy?July 13, 2005
The case will be heard in London on February 13, 2007. McKinnon has been waiting for this date to be confirmed since last July, when he lost his first appeal against extradition. The appeal court in that case judged that extradition to the U.S. was justified, after which McKinnon was granted leave to appeal to a higher court.
If his second appeal on February 13 is not successful, McKinnon's only remaining avenue is to appeal to the House of Lords, a British court of last resort, but he is not hopeful.
"Look what happened to the NatWest Three," he told ZDNet UK, CNET News.com's sister site, on Monday. "They had a lot of people behind them, but they were still not given leave to appeal to the House of Lords."
McKinnon believes that he has little chance of being successful at his hearing in the New Year. "I don't have much faith in this government to act independently (of the U.S.)," he said.
The NatWest Three, also known as the Enron Three, were the first test case of the U.K.'s recent Extradition Act and were extradited to the U.S. on July 13. Theirs was the first case held under the act.
McKinnon has been fighting extradition since July last year. The accused hacker has never been convicted of an offence in the U.K. He has admitted accessing U.S. systems, but maintains that he never damaged any of the systems he entered. When his actions were first discovered, the U.K. authorities did not think they were serious enough to be worth prosecuting.
The U.S. government maintains that McKinnon's exploits caused millions of dollars' worth of damage to a wide range of its crucial defense systems.
The U.K. Extradition Act 2003 was rushed into law after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and does not include a requirement for an extradition request from the U.S. to contain prima facie evidence of the charges. The act has not been ratified by the U.S., so while McKinnon is being extradited to the U.S. under its terms, the U.K. government cannot extradite a U.S. citizen to the U.K.
1 commentJoin the conversation! Add your comment