July 11, 2005 12:22 PM PDT

All eyes on new DVDs' format war

(continued from previous page)

studios, is more similar to today's DVD. It comes in 15-gigabyte, 30-gigabyte or 45-gigabyte forms. Its backers recently added a version that would allow studios to put a conventional DVD on one side and a high-definition version of the movie on the other.

Its studio backers say manufacturing costs for this will be considerably lower, because they can reuse much of the same equipment in today's plants. The double-sided disc format will also be more attractive to consumers who aren't yet ready to invest in a new DVD player, they argue.

HD DVD, Blu-Ray backers
"The capacity difference between the two is not enough that anyone will notice," said Warner Bros. Chief Technology Officer Chris Cookson. "Interactivity and quality are the same. If we have a choice, what would be the logical reason to pick anything other than HD DVD? There doesn't seem to be any reason for Blu-Ray to exist."

Both sides have said for months that they want to come to some agreement that would merge the two specifications, and that talks are ongoing. While early press reports of an imminent agreement have fallen through, neither side is admitting defeat yet.

"We fully agree and concur that a single format is the best bet," said Mark Knox, adviser to the HD DVD promotion division at Toshiba. "We want to talk--let's talk. We leave everything on the table. We want to find the best single format."

Victor Matsuda, a vice president at Sony's Blu-Ray Group, concurred. "Everybody realizes that it is in the best interest of us all not to come to market with two formats, to have just the one," he said. "That said, we're not there yet."

However, at least one major studio executive who is following the process closely said he expected little more progress to be made at the negotiating table, until one or the other format resonates more strongly with consumers. That executive declined to be quoted for this story.

The cost of the standoff could be substantial. According to a recent estimate by analyst firm Sanford C. Bernstein, media companies could lose as much as $16 billion over seven years if the next-generation DVDs launch with a format war, rather than waiting an extra two years to work out the differences.

Certainly, businesspeople, from the Best Buy executive suites to Chack's small shop on Haight Street, are hoping for a compromise. Retail outlets don't want to stock two versions of the same title, and see little advantage to themselves in supplying both sides.

A Netflix spokesman said his company could not comment on specific plans, but would carry whatever consumers demand.

"Ultimately there will be a standard," Netflix spokesman Steven Swasey said. "It would be good to get there earlier rather than later, rather than having it fractionalized."

Chack said he simply can't afford to buy unless there's a standard. If compromise takes longer, it could push his business even further behind the larger companies that are able to take the uncertainty in stride. But he's optimistic.

"I really think there's going to be compatibility," he said. "Otherwise it's going to be Betamax and VHS again."

Previous page
Page 1 | 2

44 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Format Wars
Your story mentions that DVD sales are down from what was expected. They site several reasons for this but none mention that the cause may be ralated to the rediculous price they want for a new movie. DVD is considerably less expensive to produce than VHS tape, yet we're expected to pay 1/3 more for them? Maybe they should try lowering prices and see what happens. I personally will wait a long time for the price of a movie to drop before purchasing. It's expensive enough already to replace a huge VHS library without having to pay more for a product than frankly it's worth.
Posted by carefree1 (7 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I agree on the rpice issue...
... my usual DVD source is Best Buy for first day bargains or price
reduced close outs ($7 to $15 per DVD), or the local pawn shops
($5 to $8 each). SOmetimes, I have to wait a month or so to get a
title through apawn shop, but I've got plenty of others to watch in
the meantime.

Maybe if the normal price dropped to $12 to $15, i'd buy more new
DVD's.
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Link Flag
Format Wars
Your story mentions that DVD sales are down from what was expected. They site several reasons for this but none mention that the cause may be ralated to the rediculous price they want for a new movie. DVD is considerably less expensive to produce than VHS tape, yet we're expected to pay 1/3 more for them? Maybe they should try lowering prices and see what happens. I personally will wait a long time for the price of a movie to drop before purchasing. It's expensive enough already to replace a huge VHS library without having to pay more for a product than frankly it's worth.
Posted by carefree1 (7 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I agree on the rpice issue...
... my usual DVD source is Best Buy for first day bargains or price
reduced close outs ($7 to $15 per DVD), or the local pawn shops
($5 to $8 each). SOmetimes, I have to wait a month or so to get a
title through apawn shop, but I've got plenty of others to watch in
the meantime.

Maybe if the normal price dropped to $12 to $15, i'd buy more new
DVD's.
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Link Flag
Git 'er done!!!
I cannot believe that after 3 months since announcing the intention to combine efforts toward a single format, they're still no closer than before.

I hated this with Beta and VHS, hated it again with the ridiculous amount of DVD writable formats, hated it further with the even more ridiculous number of flash formats, and this one is just as stupid. Personally, I blame Sony. I applaud them for their innovation, but they just seem to be uncompromising and never seem to want to get involved early with a unified format. Memory Stick, UMD, and now Blu-Ray are prime examples of coming up with a brilliant technology, but failing to bring everyone to them or making any effort toward compromise. Instead, people who love their technology end up painting themselves into a corner in terms of compatibility.

Don't take this as if I don't like the Memory Stick or UMD. I just believe it is Sony's fault that they can't get the support for their tech as the standard.
Posted by jamie.p.walsh (288 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Not Just SONY
From Blu-Ray.com
Companies backing Blu-Ray: Apple, Dell, Hitachi, HP, JVC, LG,
Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Pioneer, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, Sony,
TDK and Thomson

From Wikipedia:
HD DVD is promoted by Toshiba, NEC, Sanyo, and (most
recently) Microsoft, and backed by four major film studios.
Posted by hatandglasses13 (68 comments )
Link Flag
Git 'er done!!!
I cannot believe that after 3 months since announcing the intention to combine efforts toward a single format, they're still no closer than before.

I hated this with Beta and VHS, hated it again with the ridiculous amount of DVD writable formats, hated it further with the even more ridiculous number of flash formats, and this one is just as stupid. Personally, I blame Sony. I applaud them for their innovation, but they just seem to be uncompromising and never seem to want to get involved early with a unified format. Memory Stick, UMD, and now Blu-Ray are prime examples of coming up with a brilliant technology, but failing to bring everyone to them or making any effort toward compromise. Instead, people who love their technology end up painting themselves into a corner in terms of compatibility.

Don't take this as if I don't like the Memory Stick or UMD. I just believe it is Sony's fault that they can't get the support for their tech as the standard.
Posted by jamie.p.walsh (288 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Not Just SONY
From Blu-Ray.com
Companies backing Blu-Ray: Apple, Dell, Hitachi, HP, JVC, LG,
Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Pioneer, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, Sony,
TDK and Thomson

From Wikipedia:
HD DVD is promoted by Toshiba, NEC, Sanyo, and (most
recently) Microsoft, and backed by four major film studios.
Posted by hatandglasses13 (68 comments )
Link Flag
Cost may dominate....
DVD producers don't give a damn about the technology, only
about the bottom line. And HD-TV is a cheap screw option
compared to Blu-Ray. So go with HD-TV for the movies, and
provide dual mode (HD-TV and Blu-Ray) burners for data
storage (like the DVD+RW and DVD-RW burners now).

I want Blu-Ray for its data storage capacity. I want any format
that works for the HDTV movies.

It's time to fish or cut bait.

And cost will dominate,as far as I can see
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Data storage
Blu-ray all the way. 50 gigs on a single disc? Gimme a break! That's a better ration of disc-to-disc than CD-DVD. DVD-to-Blu-ray is 10.6 DVD's per Disc compared to 7 CD's per DVD.

HD-DVD. I think Microsoft is backing it, aren't they? Tsk, tsk, they always go with such horrible formats. If Windows Media is any indication in their decisions, HD-DVD is not the way to go!
Posted by (461 comments )
Link Flag
Cost may dominate....
DVD producers don't give a damn about the technology, only
about the bottom line. And HD-TV is a cheap screw option
compared to Blu-Ray. So go with HD-TV for the movies, and
provide dual mode (HD-TV and Blu-Ray) burners for data
storage (like the DVD+RW and DVD-RW burners now).

I want Blu-Ray for its data storage capacity. I want any format
that works for the HDTV movies.

It's time to fish or cut bait.

And cost will dominate,as far as I can see
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Data storage
Blu-ray all the way. 50 gigs on a single disc? Gimme a break! That's a better ration of disc-to-disc than CD-DVD. DVD-to-Blu-ray is 10.6 DVD's per Disc compared to 7 CD's per DVD.

HD-DVD. I think Microsoft is backing it, aren't they? Tsk, tsk, they always go with such horrible formats. If Windows Media is any indication in their decisions, HD-DVD is not the way to go!
Posted by (461 comments )
Link Flag
It's not just about movies anymore
There is one difference between this and beta/vhs. The game systems driving them. It looks like PS3 will be the big console winner and inject millions of bluray devices into homes. A friend at EA who is working on XBOX360 says that their next dev system will actually have a HD-DVD setting up a surprise announcement that xbox will in fact support HDDVD out of the gate. If they dont, then bluray will be the hands down winner. It wont even be a contest. The rate of adoption for DVD players when they first came out was years before any real number of people actually had them in their homes, it will be a similar pattern with HD-DVD if they arent in the 360.

For blu ray though, sony figured out how to beat the chicken and the egg dilemma, people WILL buy blu ray players (ps3) before there is even a lot of movies available.

As far a warners comment about wether they really need blu ray. Blu ray is for games, not movies. Games can have up to 9 hours or more of cut scenes in them, if they want the console to have HD cutscenes, they will need the space. Sony is looking at the future so we dont have to change formats again in 3 years, while toshiba is looking at a short term fix to just get something out the door.
Posted by davecazz (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
It's not just about movies anymore
There is one difference between this and beta/vhs. The game systems driving them. It looks like PS3 will be the big console winner and inject millions of bluray devices into homes. A friend at EA who is working on XBOX360 says that their next dev system will actually have a HD-DVD setting up a surprise announcement that xbox will in fact support HDDVD out of the gate. If they dont, then bluray will be the hands down winner. It wont even be a contest. The rate of adoption for DVD players when they first came out was years before any real number of people actually had them in their homes, it will be a similar pattern with HD-DVD if they arent in the 360.

For blu ray though, sony figured out how to beat the chicken and the egg dilemma, people WILL buy blu ray players (ps3) before there is even a lot of movies available.

As far a warners comment about wether they really need blu ray. Blu ray is for games, not movies. Games can have up to 9 hours or more of cut scenes in them, if they want the console to have HD cutscenes, they will need the space. Sony is looking at the future so we dont have to change formats again in 3 years, while toshiba is looking at a short term fix to just get something out the door.
Posted by davecazz (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
BOTH: TO GET IT DONE NOW.
THERE HAVE BEEN SO MANY VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES THAT MERE VHS VS BETAMAX REALLY SEEMS UNNEEDINGLY ALARMEST. THERES' 3/4 INCH TAPE, VHS TAPE, VHS CASSETTE, BETAMAX IN TWO SIZES, MAGNETIC DISC, LARGE LASER DISC,MID SIZED LASER DISC, DVD DISC & MINI DVD DISC ALL OUT THERE TODAY (PLUS DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS), ALL HAVE SUPPLIERS, SOME NITCHE MARKET. MY POINT IS TWO MORE FORMATS WON'T HARM ANYTHING, YOU STILL GET YOUR EQUIPMENT & MEDIA TO PLAY WITH AS LONG AS ITS' REPAIRABLILY OPERATERABLE. WHEN "SONY" FINALLY WINS, NO LOSS, LIKE ALL OTHER LESS DESIRABLE FORMATS, THOSE OTHERS JUST KEEP WORKING. STUDIOS ARE GREED MONSTERS, BOTH MUST BE PLACATED OR NO ONE WILL GET ANYTHING. WE NEED MORE BANDWIDTH & BUILT IN ATSC SETS TO PLAY HDTV FORMAT UPON NOW. THERES NO NEED TO ACCOMADATE OLDER DVD, WITH PLAYERS COSTING UNDER $50.
SIGNED:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Posted by (10 comments )
Reply Link Flag
keep it down
wow, the fact that your comment was all caps put me off. i haven't even read it. rewrite it in non-caps...
Posted by Scott W (419 comments )
Link Flag
BOTH: TO GET IT DONE NOW.
THERE HAVE BEEN SO MANY VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES THAT MERE VHS VS BETAMAX REALLY SEEMS UNNEEDINGLY ALARMEST. THERES' 3/4 INCH TAPE, VHS TAPE, VHS CASSETTE, BETAMAX IN TWO SIZES, MAGNETIC DISC, LARGE LASER DISC,MID SIZED LASER DISC, DVD DISC & MINI DVD DISC ALL OUT THERE TODAY (PLUS DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS), ALL HAVE SUPPLIERS, SOME NITCHE MARKET. MY POINT IS TWO MORE FORMATS WON'T HARM ANYTHING, YOU STILL GET YOUR EQUIPMENT & MEDIA TO PLAY WITH AS LONG AS ITS' REPAIRABLILY OPERATERABLE. WHEN "SONY" FINALLY WINS, NO LOSS, LIKE ALL OTHER LESS DESIRABLE FORMATS, THOSE OTHERS JUST KEEP WORKING. STUDIOS ARE GREED MONSTERS, BOTH MUST BE PLACATED OR NO ONE WILL GET ANYTHING. WE NEED MORE BANDWIDTH & BUILT IN ATSC SETS TO PLAY HDTV FORMAT UPON NOW. THERES NO NEED TO ACCOMADATE OLDER DVD, WITH PLAYERS COSTING UNDER $50.
SIGNED:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Posted by (10 comments )
Reply Link Flag
keep it down
wow, the fact that your comment was all caps put me off. i haven't even read it. rewrite it in non-caps...
Posted by Scott W (419 comments )
Link Flag
Dual format players the answer?
I'm not convinced this needs to be such a big deal as people are making out. The writeable DVD format-war, whilst initially confusing and annoying, has largely ceased to be an issue because most drives can now read and write most formats. I see no reason why the same cannot be achieved with the two HD formats. The VHS/Betamax analogy is a poor one, because those formats were physically incompatible in a way that is simply not the case with a standard sized optical disc.

Provided that dual format players are available *as standard* from the outset, the consumer will not perceive a problem and the two formats can compete on price, features, quality of the available films etc. Maybe one will quietly disappear, or maybe they will continue to co-exist. It shouldn't matter. So, having failed to do the sensible thing and agree on a single format, what the industry needs to do now is ensure that the necessary cross-licensing agreements are in place to make this a reality.
Posted by Pyriform (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Backward compatibility matters here
I agree that multi-format players finessed the recordable dvd problem, but we should remember that there was not a huge population of earlier-generation machines out there working from one format before the other came along. In the case of DVD movies, backward compatibility is essential; you can't introduce a format that won't play on older players and expect movie studios to bother with it, the profit loss is too great.

Consumers have shown a fondness for maximizing utility; the hd music disc formats that Sony and others tried to introduce a few years back failed because the music producers did not include the standard cd track embedded into the disc (an advertised capability of the formats)for people who had the need to use them on coventional cd players from time to time, causing the audiophiles to balk.

I can see a scenario where blu-ray can lead a separate existence in the gaming world, because gamers are their own market which producers will cater to, but conventional movie studios have nothing to gain by introducing the complexity of a disc that won't play in all existing players. Like the music cd, the current format and its playing equipment have become a center of gravity for all future developments.
Posted by Razzl (1318 comments )
Link Flag
Dual format players the answer?
I'm not convinced this needs to be such a big deal as people are making out. The writeable DVD format-war, whilst initially confusing and annoying, has largely ceased to be an issue because most drives can now read and write most formats. I see no reason why the same cannot be achieved with the two HD formats. The VHS/Betamax analogy is a poor one, because those formats were physically incompatible in a way that is simply not the case with a standard sized optical disc.

Provided that dual format players are available *as standard* from the outset, the consumer will not perceive a problem and the two formats can compete on price, features, quality of the available films etc. Maybe one will quietly disappear, or maybe they will continue to co-exist. It shouldn't matter. So, having failed to do the sensible thing and agree on a single format, what the industry needs to do now is ensure that the necessary cross-licensing agreements are in place to make this a reality.
Posted by Pyriform (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Backward compatibility matters here
I agree that multi-format players finessed the recordable dvd problem, but we should remember that there was not a huge population of earlier-generation machines out there working from one format before the other came along. In the case of DVD movies, backward compatibility is essential; you can't introduce a format that won't play on older players and expect movie studios to bother with it, the profit loss is too great.

Consumers have shown a fondness for maximizing utility; the hd music disc formats that Sony and others tried to introduce a few years back failed because the music producers did not include the standard cd track embedded into the disc (an advertised capability of the formats)for people who had the need to use them on coventional cd players from time to time, causing the audiophiles to balk.

I can see a scenario where blu-ray can lead a separate existence in the gaming world, because gamers are their own market which producers will cater to, but conventional movie studios have nothing to gain by introducing the complexity of a disc that won't play in all existing players. Like the music cd, the current format and its playing equipment have become a center of gravity for all future developments.
Posted by Razzl (1318 comments )
Link Flag
DVDs Are a Poor Entertainment Value
If I want to experience a movie, I have several options:

1. Go to a movie theatre (where ticket prices are $10 each---a manager at one said "Prices are high because people bring in their own snacks." but years ago said "Snacks are expensive because movies are so cheap." Movie snacks are still ridiculously expensive ($5 for a bottle of water!), but movie tickets are $10---with commercials.

2. Buy the DVD for around $20 (average price). This really isn't worth it---many movies I want to see once but not more than once.

3. Rent the DVD for around $5. This is the best option for me, and I'm sure more and more people aren't as eager to part with $20 for a movie that just sits on their shelf after it has been watched once.

If Hollywood wants to sell more DVDs, lower the prices. If movie theatres want more attendance, they need to lower their ticket and concession prices.

Until they do, I'm sure they will see sales slumps---movies are entertaining but few are a big enough bang for the buck.

Entertainment is about value---and in most cases, cable TV and movie rentals are a far better value for the dollar (for the price of 5 movies a month, I have access to over 100 channels) than theatre movies or DVD purchases.

The only DVDs I buy are the few movies I want to own, that I will watch many times over. There are some great values, but overall, most DVDs and most movies in the theatre aren't enough entertainment value for the dollar.
Posted by bluemist9999 (1020 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Little value in DVD purchase
You've hit the nail on the head: few movies are worthing investing more than one theater viewing.
Posted by (4 comments )
Link Flag
DVDs Are a Poor Entertainment Value
If I want to experience a movie, I have several options:

1. Go to a movie theatre (where ticket prices are $10 each---a manager at one said "Prices are high because people bring in their own snacks." but years ago said "Snacks are expensive because movies are so cheap." Movie snacks are still ridiculously expensive ($5 for a bottle of water!), but movie tickets are $10---with commercials.

2. Buy the DVD for around $20 (average price). This really isn't worth it---many movies I want to see once but not more than once.

3. Rent the DVD for around $5. This is the best option for me, and I'm sure more and more people aren't as eager to part with $20 for a movie that just sits on their shelf after it has been watched once.

If Hollywood wants to sell more DVDs, lower the prices. If movie theatres want more attendance, they need to lower their ticket and concession prices.

Until they do, I'm sure they will see sales slumps---movies are entertaining but few are a big enough bang for the buck.

Entertainment is about value---and in most cases, cable TV and movie rentals are a far better value for the dollar (for the price of 5 movies a month, I have access to over 100 channels) than theatre movies or DVD purchases.

The only DVDs I buy are the few movies I want to own, that I will watch many times over. There are some great values, but overall, most DVDs and most movies in the theatre aren't enough entertainment value for the dollar.
Posted by bluemist9999 (1020 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Little value in DVD purchase
You've hit the nail on the head: few movies are worthing investing more than one theater viewing.
Posted by (4 comments )
Link Flag
No DVD standard? No Retailer Support.
I was a retailer during the Beta/VHS "wars." It wasn't pretty for retailers who not only had to stock competing hardware, but competing software.
I would hope that Best Buy, Netflix, Blockbuster (Oops! BB owned by a company with a conflict of interest-Viacom) Wal Mart and other retailers would create a Retailer's Council and "suggest" a format after careful review of presentations from competing formats, and recommendations by appropriate independent testing and certification groups.
Betamax was a better format, but more expensive, so VHS won out. Which of these two competing formats is most expensive to build, own and operate? Projected failure rates? Repair costs?
Retailers could, through the creation and operation of this Retailer's Council, have serious and worthwhile input on what is best for Consumers. That, after all, should be the primary consideration.
Maybe it should be a consumer body, like Consumer's Union.
While I'm a big believer in free markets and competitive markets, I think consumer's should not have to pay for competing forces and products to be tested on the backs of consumers.
Posted by bdennis410 (175 comments )
Reply Link Flag
No DVD standard? No Retailer Support.
I was a retailer during the Beta/VHS "wars." It wasn't pretty for retailers who not only had to stock competing hardware, but competing software.
I would hope that Best Buy, Netflix, Blockbuster (Oops! BB owned by a company with a conflict of interest-Viacom) Wal Mart and other retailers would create a Retailer's Council and "suggest" a format after careful review of presentations from competing formats, and recommendations by appropriate independent testing and certification groups.
Betamax was a better format, but more expensive, so VHS won out. Which of these two competing formats is most expensive to build, own and operate? Projected failure rates? Repair costs?
Retailers could, through the creation and operation of this Retailer's Council, have serious and worthwhile input on what is best for Consumers. That, after all, should be the primary consideration.
Maybe it should be a consumer body, like Consumer's Union.
While I'm a big believer in free markets and competitive markets, I think consumer's should not have to pay for competing forces and products to be tested on the backs of consumers.
Posted by bdennis410 (175 comments )
Reply Link Flag
No need for greater capacity DVD
There is absolutely no need for higher capacity DVDs! Current DVD specs allow for 8 hours of video on a double-sided, double layer (18GB) disk. Look at the last box set you bought, recieved, etc: couldn't all of those disks fit on to one 18 GB DVD? Let's first figure out how to get manufacturers to fill up the DVDs being sold now before we expand capacity. At least it would forstall another VHS/Betamax fiacso!
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
And have you noticed ....
.... how many DVD viewers want to turn over their DVD's half way
through a movie????

Damn few, my friend. The first DVD's were single layer DVD's and
they did have to be turned over half way through the movie. Dual
layer DVD's were developed to eliminate the 'turn over' need.

The same thing will be needed for HDTV, and for that, we need a
new format.
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Link Flag
No need for greater capacity DVD
There is absolutely no need for higher capacity DVDs! Current DVD specs allow for 8 hours of video on a double-sided, double layer (18GB) disk. Look at the last box set you bought, recieved, etc: couldn't all of those disks fit on to one 18 GB DVD? Let's first figure out how to get manufacturers to fill up the DVDs being sold now before we expand capacity. At least it would forstall another VHS/Betamax fiacso!
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
And have you noticed ....
.... how many DVD viewers want to turn over their DVD's half way
through a movie????

Damn few, my friend. The first DVD's were single layer DVD's and
they did have to be turned over half way through the movie. Dual
layer DVD's were developed to eliminate the 'turn over' need.

The same thing will be needed for HDTV, and for that, we need a
new format.
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Link Flag
Which is more durable?
CNET ran a story last year about these two formats. The story pointed out that one of these formats would play even if the more durable discs became heavily scratched. If the two formats have close to the same density storage, then the tie breaker should be its durability. How many time have you rented a DVD from your local video store only to discover it looks like someone used it as a Frisbee?

My two DVD players from different manufacturers get very finicky if there are deep scratches on the discs. I get sick and tired of having to return the discs for another copy of a movie when my players won't advance a flick when it hits a serious scratch. This invariably happens about halfway through. I understand this is a problem with Netflix.

I hope CNET will revisit this durability issue with the new formats. It may be a catalyst issue to get manufacturers to finally pick one.
Posted by Terry Gay (127 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Which is more durable?
CNET ran a story last year about these two formats. The story pointed out that one of these formats would play even if the more durable discs became heavily scratched. If the two formats have close to the same density storage, then the tie breaker should be its durability. How many time have you rented a DVD from your local video store only to discover it looks like someone used it as a Frisbee?

My two DVD players from different manufacturers get very finicky if there are deep scratches on the discs. I get sick and tired of having to return the discs for another copy of a movie when my players won't advance a flick when it hits a serious scratch. This invariably happens about halfway through. I understand this is a problem with Netflix.

I hope CNET will revisit this durability issue with the new formats. It may be a catalyst issue to get manufacturers to finally pick one.
Posted by Terry Gay (127 comments )
Reply Link Flag
EVD is supported and already on the market
Enhanced Video Disc (EVD) has been doing really well in Asian... lots movies and the quality is amazing..
got one of those babies, its running and enjoyed is very much... wish the US jump on the market.. so I can see some US movies on EVD.
Posted by mythmanq (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
EVD is supported and already on the market
Enhanced Video Disc (EVD) has been doing really well in Asian... lots movies and the quality is amazing..
got one of those babies, its running and enjoyed is very much... wish the US jump on the market.. so I can see some US movies on EVD.
Posted by mythmanq (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.