- Related Stories
-
Vonage's lucky break?
April 3, 2007 -
Vonage ordered to stop using Verizon VoIP patents
March 23, 2007 -
Vonage to pay $58 million in Verizon patent case
March 8, 2007 -
Vonage, Verizon spar in court over patents
February 27, 2007 -
Verizon sues Vonage for VoIP patent infringement
June 19, 2006
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears patent disputes in Washington, D.C., blocked the injunction from taking effect until the judges were able to consider arguments in the patent case brought by Verizon Communications.
During a Friday morning hearing here that lasted about an hour, U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton ordered Vonage not to accept any new customers while it continues to infringe on Verizon's patents covering some aspects of Internet phone calls.
A copy of the one-page appeals court order(PDF) provided to CNET News.com by Vonage's legal counsel gives Verizon until April 13 to respond to the voice over Internet Protocol company's request to lift the injunction during the appeal process. It was signed by Chief Judge Paul Michel.
Roger Warin, Vonage's attorney, protested Hilton's no-new-customers order during Friday's hearing. Arguing the decision was just as threatening to Vonage as a full injunction, he said "it would be the difference of cutting off oxygen as opposed to a bullet to the head."
He also told Hilton that "in effect, what you are doing is slowly strangling Vonage, because it cannot preserve that customer base" indefinitely. He noted that Vonage's customer turnover rate is 2.5 percent per month.
Verizon in court filings this week had opposed anything more than a so-called partial stay on the permanent injunction against Vonage. Attorneys for the nation's second-largest telephone company argued that without at least those restrictions, Vonage would continue to pour resources into adding new customers, potentially leaching additional subscribers from Verizon and causing it to lose business.
The judge's order follows a federal jury finding on March 8 that Vonage had infringed three Verizon patents. The New Jersey-based Internet phone provider was ordered to pay $58 million in damages.
Judge Hilton announced two weeks ago that he planned to sign off on an injunction barring Vonage from using the disputed Verizon technologies, but he gave the parties time to convince him otherwise.
Hilton on Friday also ordered Vonage to post an approximately $66 million bond, which includes interest accrued on the damages awarded and other legal costs, while it carries out its appeal.
Financial analysts said the partial injunction, if eventually upheld on appeal, would be a severe blow to Vonage.
"All carriers that have any degree of churn, which is pretty much everyone I know of, must be able to add new subscribers to remain viable as a business," said Albert Lin, an equities analyst with American Technology Research.
But for Vonage, being hamstrung in this way could be particularly devastating, as it faces stiff competition from cable operators, which are also targeting residential phone users with their own VoIP services. Then there are the Internet companies, such as Skype, Google, and Yahoo, that are also offering VoIP services that allow people to make calls to traditional phones as well as cell phones.
See more CNET content tagged:
Vonage Holdings Corp.,
injunction,
Internet phone,
Verizon Communications,
Internet phone company




What got me was: 1)a box on the account home page saying that they were aware of an issue with customers not being able to use their service. Okay, about an hour and a half after I read that, my service came back up - after I had rebooted the adapter twice thinking that a small powere glitch we had here might have caused it.
2) If you try to log into your Vonage account now, either a)it takes forever before you get there, or b)you get a page that says they are upgrading.
Personally, I'd start checking into the judge's qualifications to deal with cases like this. Not all judges are technologically savvy enough to understand patents, VOIP, etc. And I'd start checking into the patents that Verizon alleges that Vonage infringed on, especially after Verizon lowered the number of patents.
All this smells of Verizon wanting to kill off the competition and they'll use whatever they can to do so.
And for the conspiracy folks...I wonder if the judge has Verizon stock or an interest in Verizon.
Just my three cents worth.
For many years I had an issue when we'd get a heavy rain. One or the other line, sometimes both, would stop working for a day. By the time Verizon got there, they worked OK again. Sometimes they'd rerun one of my connections, sometimes they'd just say, call us when it breaks again. They insisted the problem was in the wiring in my house. Funny thing, Vonage connects to the same lines and I haven't had a problem since I switched a couple years ago!
Verizon service is atrotious (sp?) at best. Any time I had a problem or wanted to change something it would take like two weeks. So once I switched over I called Verizon to let them know I would no longer need their services. After hanging up I decided to make a call on what should have been the rest of my months service Verizon and found to my suprise that my phone had been turned off within seconds.
CRAZY!!!
The moral of the story is that outside cable splices are subject to moisture penetration. Unless it rains in your house, I wouldn't look for a problem there. (although jacks & such can go bad) It's easy enough to test at the entry point.
A dedicated Vonage user.
I do believe that if Verizon ends up buying Vonage (I suspect it will), I'll just have to go somewhere that isn't Verizon to get phone service... and meanwhile not patronize Verizon for anything else.
/P
I begged my wife not to get a mobile phone from them, but she said they have a monopoly on providing service in the subway.
The calls go over AT&T lines. I don't think Verizon will take on SBC/AT&T on this crappy patent thing.
Any techno geek out there knows, that Cable Modem is faster then DSL, regardless of what analysts say.
Verizon it must really stick in your crawl, that you as a company have invested all that time, effort and money into a VoIP system that is slower then your competitor can provide, or has provided, they just used the existing technology that was there...
In the long run saving themselves and there customers lots and lots of money..
Serves you as a company right..
As a company you guys will probably not go belly up, but I hope my comments will fuel others to think and dig deeper on issues and things dealing with business dealings..
You guys got bested by another company, providing a better service, sucks doesnt it?
Well seems you got what you wanted for the time being anyways...
Anyways, he is another question:
How does Verizon corporate people sleep at night?
And Judge I wouldnt be surprised to see your interests in this case have something to do with a financial gain, and nothing to do with law or justice for that matter..
Money, good ol greed, who has it, or wants it, and how to get more of it..
Forget the customer paying for the service..
Verizon did, that is why people dont like Verizon as a provider anyway, rofl..
Go Vonage
Now had I been the judge in this case and having listened to all this rabble from both sides for almost the past year, here would have been my final judgement on this matter..
If there really is a problem, and Vonage is doing what Verizon has said, and then I have Verizon retract 4 of those initial patent infringement charges, I would judge this way..
Neither Vonage or Verizon should be able to enlist new customers at all, until said appeals, judgements and the whole case can be heard over its proper channels..
But hey that is just my opinion..
Think about it.
As far as I can see, this (VOIP)is the best thing that's ever happened to the consumer. The Bellophone monopoly is dying, and of course they are fighting for their life. Just like M$, they will do anything they can to destroy their competition.
What is the diference between the technology Vonage uses and the major (read cash rich and with armies of lawyers) cable companies usefor VOIP?
FWIW, we have Verizon for our cell phones, as they have the best coverage of any of the major providers in our area. Can't speak to the quality of thier phones as we use ours as phones, rather than hockeypucks etc. However my next one will not leave the store without Sousa's "Stars and Stripes Forever" as an available ringtone, not just an empty promise from the store staff. (It's the little things ...)
http://www.google.com/patents?id=OfwkAAAAEBAJ
There is no end to this.
I do hope this is cleared up properly but i need to seem more solid proof of a real infringement that's special to Vonage.
It doesn't even seem like a hardware vs software issue.
- Verizon is a Criminal corporation
-
by hhaque
June 30, 2007 1:36 PM PDT
- I have had extremely bad experience with verizon service. Their policy is to get a customer to sign a contract and then rip that person off in every way possible. I hope Verizon would cease to exist in near future. Ivan Seidenberg - you have made verizon a monster.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(29 Comments)