• On BNET: 3 worst things about the iPhone 3G S

January 28, 2008 9:20 AM PST

A quarter of Apple iPhones may be 'unlocked'

  • 14 comments
A quarter of Apple iPhones may be 'unlocked'
Related Blogs

Report: iPhones piling up at AT&T stores


January 24, 2008

The iPhone gets updated


January 15, 2008

The Great iPhone Hack, round 3


October 11, 2007

Analyst calls the percentage of phones used on wireless networks other than AT&T's "stunning."

The story "A quarter of Apple iPhones may be 'unlocked'" published January 28, 2008 at 9:20 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
I knew it!
by Yog Sothoth January 28, 2008 9:51 PM PST
I knew the number of unlocked phones must be high, because everyone I know who has an iPhone has it unlocked, including me. Nobody wants to pay ATT $3000.
Reply to this comment
Locked Phones are a scam anyway...
by FusedAndCondazed January 29, 2008 4:17 AM PST
I travel enough to know better anyway. Carriers in the U.S. claim they are subsidizing the cost of the phone. Not true. I refuse to buy phones in the U.S. because even the unlocked versions are inflated. Here's my example:

in 2004, I purchased a very popular phone overseas. The comparison: I paid $150 LESS than the version available in the US. The one Cingular offered was just the phone, the book, the A/C charger. Nothing else. What did I get with mine? All that plus the phone software and cables, the car charger as well as the AC one, the leather phone case, and the handsfree kit (wired), and mine was unlocked, and did *not* require a 2 year contract. Where is the subsidy there? And just about every phone on their site is the same. I can find a new, fully warranted, unlocked version for less somewhere, it's just a matter of knowing where to look to dode the scam of pricing here in the US.
View reply
What he said
by Nodack January 29, 2008 11:36 AM PST
Yeah, nobody wants to pay AT&T $3000 when you can pay
somebody else $3000 and have half of your features not work
and have to worry about updating your phone. Your right that
does sound much better.
View reply
Unlocked Apple iPhones
by Gary Valan January 28, 2008 10:53 PM PST
I don't know why anyone should be shocked or surprised. A search in Google brings up any number of unlocked iphones for sale even in India where I am traveling on work and even the CNET's sponsored links had them. I know at least a half a dozen people in my limited circle here with the less than full featured iPhones .

As long as AT&T or their other international partners "looks" the other way Apple can have the cake and eat it too.

I will still not buy one as long as ATT (my carrier) forces me onto yet another expensive plan and kindly sells the phone at full price...
Reply to this comment
AT&T is so mean
by Nodack January 29, 2008 11:50 AM PST
By that you must mean that the other carriers don't make you
sign up for an expensive plan. Which one of those several
carriers doesn't make you sign up for an expensive plan?

<cricket sounds>

I'm waiting.
Not necessarily a bad thing
by gmesaric January 29, 2008 1:14 AM PST
Apple made a big mistake when introducing the Mac back in
1984. They did not license the technology, but kept it
proprietary. The result: The PC became the de facto standard,
even though (at least back then) inferior technology.

The large number of unlocked phones means that people really
like the iPhone. This is good. However, not everyone will want to
switch providers to get a new phone. What Apple might succeed
in with this business model is to optimize short-term results,
BUT mid- to long-term, an open business model for the iPhone
would be better (also for Apple) in my opinion.

Otherwise, who knows -- maybe Google will overtake the
iPhone in time...
Reply to this comment
Being unlocked is the way to to for 1.1.3
by inachu January 29, 2008 4:35 AM PST
I am tired of being locked in and appple is dragging their feet preventing me from installing games on my iphone.
Game emulators and such are all the rage. Apple could care less.
Would like to see like a 3D shooting game from appple but as slow as they are I am sure this is like 3 to 5 years away.
Reply to this comment
One question..
by Maclover1 January 29, 2008 4:47 AM PST
Who really cares?

Honestly all these articles about who was first to do it, how the new fimrware bricked some....who cares.

You should have articles about people taking the tags off of their beds...it would be worth as much jounalistically.
Reply to this comment
not the story of the year
by gp2792 January 29, 2008 8:39 AM PST
i'll give you that, but it does matter to stockholders:

"For example, Sacconaghi said, if Apple hit its sales goal of 10
million iPhones by the end of fiscal 2008 but 30 percent of those
don't result in any carrier payments, its revenue and profit would
be $500 million and 37 cents per share lower than expected."
View reply
FCC Thinks It's not Yet Time?
by Renegade Knight January 29, 2008 8:21 AM PST
The FCC isn't yet ready to back unlocked phones similar to how land lines work? The iPhone is a PITA to unlock and they still unlock them to use them on the network of their choice.
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Apple (-1.97%) -2.81 140.02
AT&T (5.03%) 1.26 26.33
Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 8,280.74
S&P 500 (-2.91%) -26.91 896.42
NASDAQ (-2.67%) -49.20 1,796.52
CNET TECH (11.32%) 149.69 1,472.57
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right