Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: SETH MACFARLANE 2 raunchy 4 Microsoft

February 28, 2007 4:00 AM PST

A cure for e-mail attention disorder?

  • 12 comments

(continued from previous page)

Ross and Leighton Read, a Seriosity co-founder and board member, said they intend for Serios to be a single currency, regardless of which company uses them. That's partly because they understand many employees are contractors who work for several clients and who might eventually want to use Serios they accumulate in multiple corporations.

This means that a so-called secondary market for Serios--perhaps on eBay or other venues--is almost certain to develop as the real value for the currency evolves. That's because some people would be sure to accumulate more than they can use, while others would want more than they have.

That's particularly true, Ross suggested, because while Attent is currently Seriosity's only product, the company sees other future uses for Serios such as auctions of desirable parking spaces, allocation of equipment or prioritization of IT resources.

Naturally, Serios have no value and Attent is meaningless unless Seriosity clients have a significant number of people employing the system.

"A tool like this will only be really effective when it's adopted by a lot of people," said Ron Meiners, who works in developer relations for virtual world platform developer Multiverse Network. "Which means it not only has to be useful, it has to be clearly useful, and popular, so that people will adopt it."

Meiners said he believe the system is "exciting," particularly because of the way Seriosity is attempting to help companies organize social information.

For his part, Nikos Drakos, a research director with Gartner, said he sees Seriosity's system as a "novel approach" to the burgeoning corporate e-mail management problem.

"I think it's very well worth experimenting with it," Drakos said. "I don't know that there's enough evidence that it will have the desired effect. And even if there is, I don't know that Seriosity is the right company."

But he, too, said he found Seriosity's system "exciting" and that he and others at Gartner are keeping an eye on the company to see how Attent works out.

Seriosity, which currently has 12 employees, is functioning off of a $6 million investment by Read's Alloy Ventures and is seeking a second round of funding. The trick for the company will be not only to prove that Attent works, but to manage its newly formed virtual economy.

"It's important because this is an economy, and we don't want to have inflation," Ross said. "We don't know what the (inflation management system) is going to be. We think there will be some taxes on wealth because you don't want people to accumulate Serios."

Ultimately, for Castronova, the creation of a new economy for managing e-mail overload is no different than the creation of any new economy. And that's why he believes the system can work.

"Never again will you read the e-mail warning you to take your food out of the company refrigerator by Friday," Castronova said. "It will be forever relegated to the bottom of your inbox, because with the Serio, you can quickly and easily sort the thousands of messages and read only the ones that they really care about--the ones they put Serios on."

Previous page
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
e-mail management, currency, economy, attention, pager

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Give me a break!
by adlyb1 February 28, 2007 4:52 AM PST
I already spend too much time trying to properly communicate with other people I work with and now I have to *buy* their attention?

This is simply not the way to improve productivity.
Reply to this comment
Just need to collect a few more
by airwalkery2k February 28, 2007 7:15 AM PST
Sorry about the delay, boss. I just need a few more Serios before I can send the memo to the Moscow office.
You have got to be kidding
by rcrusoe February 28, 2007 5:59 AM PST
If I didn't get fired for suggesting this kind of lunacy, I would the first time an executive didn't get an important email because the sender was out of "stamps".

IMO, in corporate America this plan will fail because cutting off someone's ability to use email would have more serious repercussions for I.T. than cutting off their oxygen.
Reply to this comment
A cure for e-mail attention disorder?
by tony kaye February 28, 2007 6:16 AM PST
Seems to me this would take even more time.
Reply to this comment
complete waste of time
by screamforme February 28, 2007 6:26 AM PST
So now I not only have to read the email to decide if it's spam, I have to give some kind of ranking? I guess workers in CA don't have much to do during the day.
Reply to this comment
Re: complete waste of time
by freemarket--2008 February 28, 2007 7:20 AM PST
I think the assumption is that external SPAM will still be filtered as usual. This scheme would cut down on internal SPAM. It does seem a bit too wacky for the mainstream though.
build intelligent email
by HerbWexler February 28, 2007 7:48 AM PST
The number of in office emails can be reduced by adding some intelligence into the msg.

How many emails are sent to clarify earlier msg and to followup because the original msg did not get a reply.

If an email asks a question there could be some automatic responses such as Yes, No, I dont have that info, I'll respond in x hours.

The same kind of answers you would get if you called the person on the phone.

Emails haven't changed much in a decade. There is room for improvement.
Reply to this comment
Better yet...
by ddesy February 28, 2007 10:58 AM PST
Why not simply use good communication skills? Effective written communication doesn't require technological interventions.
Mind boggling stupid idea for essentiall a non-issue
by aaroberts February 28, 2007 9:11 AM PST
This is an overcomplicated stupid idea. If people are sending out needless communication that needs to be managed by the people not some dumb idea about virtual currency.

Get rid of spam and then you'll be doing something worthwhile for email.
Reply to this comment
Yes it is stupid.
by ramudd March 5, 2007 7:53 AM PST
I agree. A stupid idea for sure. I get 75 SPAM email each day and it never get off my server thanks to MailWasherPro. Simple and easy.
System down in 3 minutes. Save your work!
by hadaso February 28, 2007 11:17 PM PST
This unSerios "solution" doesn't acount for assymetry or broadcasts. There are people who need to send lots of email and there are people who need to receive lots of it. They cannot work with the same monthly allowance. And no one will be able to send important broadcasts with a limited allowance.

So now you need to give different allowances for different people and you're back to square one. This might work for a company of 6 people like the company developing this scheme. In big companies access to broadcast lists is given more according to ties with management or IT than according to needs. The same will happen with "extra Serios".

Now to the idea of making it work accross more than one organization: thisw will invite lots of porn/gambling spam. Just like they do with captcha: present them to real porn/gambling consumers in their peon/gambling sites, they will require payment in Serios to access porn/gambling and then will be able to send their spam in and gain high ranking. So you'll need to do real email whitelisting which you can do right now without Serios. Back to square one...
Reply to this comment
by reverse-auctions July 14, 2008 7:42 PM PDT
Cant see any real point but instead creating more work, but alas job security!
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.72%) 73.00 10,270.47
S&P 500 (0.57%) 6.24 1,093.48
NASDAQ (0.88%) 18.86 2,167.88
CNET TECH (0.63%) 9.86 1,587.17
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right