Manage updates with the Download App
April 14, 2006 10:19 AM PDT
A high-tech way to defrost
- Related Stories
-
Did the Sea of Galilee ice over 2,000 years ago?
April 13, 2006 -
Are laser weapons ready for duty?
April 11, 2006 -
Polyester fabric neutralizes stun gun jolt
April 5, 2006 -
Cloud seeders say: Let it snow
March 13, 2006 -
Nano memory gets big chip backer
July 1, 2004
Dartmouth College engineering professor Victor Petrenko, not to be confused with one of the Champions on Ice, has devised a way to use a burst of electricity to remove ice caked on walls or windows. For surfaces coated with a special film, the jolt gets rid of ice in less than a second, far less time than it takes to hack at it with an ice scraper.
While drivers might find easy-cleaning windshields convenient, the technology--called thin-film pulse electrothermal de-icing, or PETD--could have significant economic impact if widely deployed. It could, for example, cut the costs of repairing power lines downed by ice storms and keep plane windshields frost-free, decreasing fuel consumption.
In Sweden, civil engineers have tested PETD and decided to cover the Uddevalla Bridge in a 12-millimeter-thick PETD foil to keep it from icing over.
"Frost-free refrigerators can approximately reduce energy consumption by a factor of two. Billions of dollars are spent each year on running refrigerators and air conditioners. If you can cut that, it's great," Petrenko said. "In ice makers, we can cut the ice-harvesting cycle and increase the productivity of ice makers by 30 (percent) to 40 percent."
A refrigerator for the residential market sporting PETD will likely come out soon. The technology will also be incorporated into the windshield of an upcoming commercial jet, according to Petrenko. Aerospace parts supplier Goodrich, an investor in and one of the seven licensees of Petrenko's Ice Engineering company, is also promoting the concept among utilities as a way to keep wind turbines de-iced.
PETD can go in reverse, too. By varying the electric pulse, the technology can cause ice to stick better to surfaces. That could help snowboarders and skiers better manage the friction with the slope, for greater or lesser traction, as needed.
The technology essentially takes advantages of the inherent properties of ice. Ice, it turns out, is a semiconductor, meaning that it conducts an electrical charge under certain circumstances. Unlike silicon, which conducts negatively charged electrons, ice conducts protons, the core of hydrogen atoms that are part of the water molecules.
Video: Ice control technology
Dartmouth professor Victor Petrenko and team have developed new ways to control or alter ice, making it sticky or slippery. Here, a look at the technology.
"(An) ice surface has an enormously high electric charge," Petrenko said.
As a result, ice doesn't simply cake onto surfaces--it bonds to them in three ways: via the hydrogen atoms themselves, via an electrostatic bond caused by the current, and via comparatively weak van der Waals forces.
PETD works by breaking the first two bonds. An electric charge lasting a few milliseconds heats the surface buried in ice just long enough to melt about a micron or two of the surface of the ice. Once the ice is melted, the hydrogen and electrical bonds break. The resulting water then acts as a lubricant, allowing the mass of ice to slide away.
"With short pulses, the heat doesn't have time to diffuse. It is all released on the interface," Petrenko said.
To get ice to stick to a surface, the pulse is shortened--first the ice melts, then refreezes. The resulting bond between the material and the ice is even stronger than before.
Why hasn't anyone already come up with this?
"I don't know," he said. "It is a very common story: People for centuries miss a very simple principle. When it's found, people say, 'How could we miss it?'"
Traditional ice removal methods don't address how to reverse the electrical bonds, which explains why they don't work that well. Ice scrapers essentially tear away ice from the outside. Material to repel ice also fails because ice will invariably bond. Companies have thrown money at trying to develop ice-resistant surfaces, but the results have been mediocre.
Petrenko himself worked on a project funded by a generous federal grant. "We concluded that it is against the laws of nature to have an ice-phobic material," he said. "Ice is very strong glue. It is a universal adhesive."
The difficulty with PETD lies in power delivery. The surface only has to be heated to about 1 to 2 degrees Celsius, but a broad surface has to be heated simultaneously.
Still, an ordinary car, while running, could provide enough energy to remove the ice. It also takes less energy than heating the windshield.
The intellectual property at Ice Engineering mostly concerns developing power distribution systems and thin films, which coat the surface and conduct heat to the ice material interface. The composition of the films varies. In the case of windshields, Ice Engineering employs a layer of clear indium oxide. "It is the same thing on laptop displays," Petrenko said.
Ice machines and refrigerators, meanwhile, can rely on titanium or carbon fiber composites, which are more durable, because transparency isn't an issue.
The research, so far, has yielded 14 U.S. patents, and several more are pending. Dartmouth owns the patents but markets them through Ice Engineering.
Petrenko came to studying ice by accident. For years, he worked as a semiconductor researcher at Moscow's Institute of Physics and Technology. While on an exchange at Britain's University of Birmingham, he happened upon that school's ice research department. His life changed after that.
"We built a solar cell made of ice," he recalled. "While it is not as efficient as a silicon solar cell, it costs a penny a square mile."
See more CNET content tagged:
ice, bond, professor, video
13 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
Using electricity to melt ice is just going to make global warming pick up speed.
Its dangerous and immoral technology.
Did you not read the article? The resulting enegry use reduction in devices that ARE causing damage to the environment (or at least using up natural resources) greatly offsets the miniscule amount of energy (often cleaner energy, by the way...) used to melt the ice off.
Why is it that "Environment Enthusiasts" don't stop for half a second to think about what they're saying. Luddites... I think that's what the problem is. They're afraid good science is going to result in things that make for a better, healthier planet; they think that the best solution is to just let things go to pot.
On second thought, maybe that's the problem... too much pot.
Think about all the chemicals and what not that are in use today to defrost planes, windshields, and remove ice in general. think about all the engery that is used to perform those tasks....
NOW think about what the article says, that it takes a small amount of electricity to power this material.
Wouldn't even a tree hugging, save the world, save the whales, save the rain-forest, blahdy blah blah, person like yourself feel that even GREATLY REDUCING the harmful stuff that is in place to remove ice would be a huge benifit?
Exibar
I stand right beside you against this, and so many other immoral technologies that can only accelerate the onslaught of global warming.
And direct means of producing Electricity like Solar and Wind will never work because people like this are too Stupid to adopt it.