Comments on: IE7 being developed to resist spyware

Next version of Microsoft's browser is being built to derail hijacking attempts by spyware and other malicious software.

[Bill Dautrive]

Amazing

Finally they get it, and it only took roughly 8-10 years for them to figure it out. Way to go!

Hopefully they will implement it in an intelligent manner. The blame for the internet being such in unsecure place can be laid directly in front of Microsofts' doorstep. It is about time they start taking security seriously.

Time will tell, but I am not holding my breath. How many times have they said something, only for it to be implemented half-assed or not at all? But at least they are talking in the right direction. Yes, I know MS is 90% talk, but maybe this will pan out.

[Gino Deblauwe]

Bravo

Now they sell a webbrowser - that hasn't been programmed yet with an argument other FREE webbrowsers had for years: low on spyware
- with a version of windows which lacks almost all good features they announced to be in it with a loud voice and removed silent.

Changed to Mandrake/Mandrive 3 months ago for security, speed and most of all stability after working with DOS/Windows from the beginning, needs some work to make the change, but never been more comfortable now.
Windows XP just lacks a lot of handy features where you need 3th party SW for, that are standard in linux. And I have a thousand other reasons not to turn back.

Windows/IE/Office are allready years behind on opensource on features, speed, stability and security
But can maintain just by marketing/making loose promisses and keeping users locked in by changing open standards and their own standards every 5 foot (recent examples: XML/TCP/IP/... - SMB/Office formats/...)

And now they promiss something with great bravour that's better implemented in java anyway.
Java runs in a sandbox,
this means => NO interference with the PC
instead of some rights
The first thing someone 'with a bad attitude' searches is a little securityhole, and now they still leave one: still not enough

[saleen351]

www.getfirefox.com

Why do do people even care about a broswer that will be released in 2036 with Longhorn??? Sure thier next one is due out this summer, but it's a rush job since FF is on the hunt...

Mac + Intel + Firefox and i'm happy!

[Scott W]

or...

SuSE+Firefox/Konqueror+NWN and i am a very happy bunny!

[aabcdefghij987654321]

Administrative rights are needed too often

Far too much third party software for Windows was written which ignorantly assumed that Administrative Rights were present and too few of those third party software vendors have ever gone back and fixed their lousy programs. This is a carryover effect from the Win9x/ME days when there was no concept of administrative vs user rights.

MS needs to withhold their "Logo" certification for any program that doesn't run without adminitrative rights unless it's a utility that properly requires such rights.

[technewsjunkie]

When you're a Monopoly you can take this long...

...to fix your *#$(#**&@ products!

I want real competition in OSes.
Maybe MacIntels?