Comments on: Wiretap rules for VoIP, broadband coming in 2007
FCC approves sweeping set of wiretapping rules for broadband and Net phone providers. But it's not clear what happens next.
FCC approves sweeping set of wiretapping rules for broadband and Net phone providers. But it's not clear what happens next.
January 1, 2010 12:16 PM PST
January 1, 2010 9:20 AM PST
January 1, 2010 7:31 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Actually, most of it already is.
And, yes, wiretap-ready, means effectively already wire-tapped. Well, Im ready to be monitored, tracked, controlled and dictated to... by whoever pulls the strings of Governemnt... for my own good.
Arent you?
And you think this was all FOR THEIR OWN GOOD??? Too many authorities don't give a damn for the Constitution. DON'T TRUST THEM!!!
Actually, most of it already is.
And, yes, wiretap-ready, means effectively already wire-tapped. Well, Im ready to be monitored, tracked, controlled and dictated to... by whoever pulls the strings of Governemnt... for my own good.
Arent you?
And you think this was all FOR THEIR OWN GOOD??? Too many authorities don't give a damn for the Constitution. DON'T TRUST THEM!!!
accessing a switching system connected to an
internet addressable device. It seems to me that
I was reading that one big issue insiders had
with the system was that it was fundamentally an
open / unsecured system. Anyone with knowledge
about how to access it could wiretap from the
comfort of their own home.
I suppose that wouldn't be too much of a concern
if it weren't for the fact that there was the
growing suspicion that only a small fraction of
wiretaps were being performed by US law
enforcement and a disproportionate number were
coming from overseas...
It doesn't matter really. If you need a secure
communication channel, you can obtain one.
Wiretaps will catch simple criminals, not spies
or terrorists. Spies and terrorists have very
effective means of secure communication that
won't be impacted by any of this.
incredibly smart people, but instead they spend time going after
stuff that any kid over the age of ten can best. It is proof of how
ignorant some of them can be. Protecting America versus
turning our country into a dictatorship will be the downfall of
this country. Our government has become a textbook definition
of what the word over-reacting means. I cannot wait until they
tell little old ladies they cannot make quilts because they could
contain subversive or terrorist messages.
accessing a switching system connected to an
internet addressable device. It seems to me that
I was reading that one big issue insiders had
with the system was that it was fundamentally an
open / unsecured system. Anyone with knowledge
about how to access it could wiretap from the
comfort of their own home.
I suppose that wouldn't be too much of a concern
if it weren't for the fact that there was the
growing suspicion that only a small fraction of
wiretaps were being performed by US law
enforcement and a disproportionate number were
coming from overseas...
It doesn't matter really. If you need a secure
communication channel, you can obtain one.
Wiretaps will catch simple criminals, not spies
or terrorists. Spies and terrorists have very
effective means of secure communication that
won't be impacted by any of this.
incredibly smart people, but instead they spend time going after
stuff that any kid over the age of ten can best. It is proof of how
ignorant some of them can be. Protecting America versus
turning our country into a dictatorship will be the downfall of
this country. Our government has become a textbook definition
of what the word over-reacting means. I cannot wait until they
tell little old ladies they cannot make quilts because they could
contain subversive or terrorist messages.
Great Idea. It seems the only thing the Federales are adept at is taking our constitutional rights away. FYI: Osama died in Dec. 2001 & Zarqawi is also dead. Whenever you hear their names & their subsequent "terror threats" or "beheadings, bombings, etc" rest assured they, themselves are hardly a threat, as they are as dead as dead can be. Just another "FEAR FACTOR" our gov't is so very good at producing.
Great Idea. It seems the only thing the Federales are adept at is taking our constitutional rights away. FYI: Osama died in Dec. 2001 & Zarqawi is also dead. Whenever you hear their names & their subsequent "terror threats" or "beheadings, bombings, etc" rest assured they, themselves are hardly a threat, as they are as dead as dead can be. Just another "FEAR FACTOR" our gov't is so very good at producing.
The basic premise underlying the FCC action, that VoIP requires a broadband connection (>= 200kb) is just plain wrong. A bandwidth of 1/10 as much, or 20 kbps is more than adequate for VoIP or Internet chat. Not to mention the fact that one could simply create a VPN connection over a public network and encapsulate the voice and data stream using a proprietary protcol. There is no need to use a public VoIP provider to do VoIP if you are constantly communicating with the same people.
The basic premise underlying the FCC action, that VoIP requires a broadband connection (>= 200kb) is just plain wrong. A bandwidth of 1/10 as much, or 20 kbps is more than adequate for VoIP or Internet chat. Not to mention the fact that one could simply create a VPN connection over a public network and encapsulate the voice and data stream using a proprietary protcol. There is no need to use a public VoIP provider to do VoIP if you are constantly communicating with the same people.
Locked in the air (FEMA wants your wep password), on the cable and in the transmission. I've tryed explaining what a certificate is and why you can't have it to some people but they will never learn.
What is secured? Alex.
So, what can I be aware of, to watch/listen for, regarding my Vonage Service? I am not worried about the feds, but local law enforcement in the Good Old Boy South, is very often puppet strung by the folks I am investigating.
Thanks
- Special device for listening to VOIP conversations
- by November 15, 2005 4:48 AM PST
- http://store1.yimg.com/I/yhst-50384103564030_1869_20192832
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- How Easy Is It?
- by EdmundBurke November 28, 2005 9:00 AM PST
- I have recently switched to Vonage, partly out of frustration with utter lack of customer service by the Southern Belle, and partly out of concern for security...I have a Public Corruption Research Company, and my phone has been messed with a number of times, both at the box, and at the "station".
- Like this
-
(28 Comments)Locked in the air (FEMA wants your wep password), on the cable and in the transmission. I've tryed explaining what a certificate is and why you can't have it to some people but they will never learn.
What is secured? Alex.
So, what can I be aware of, to watch/listen for, regarding my Vonage Service? I am not worried about the feds, but local law enforcement in the Good Old Boy South, is very often puppet strung by the folks I am investigating.
Thanks