Comments on: AT&T chief refuses to 'miss' VoIP
David Dorman, AT&T's chief executive, is determined to turn voice over Internet Protocol into an HBO-like service that it can sell.
David Dorman, AT&T's chief executive, is determined to turn voice over Internet Protocol into an HBO-like service that it can sell.
December 5, 2009 4:54 PM PST
December 5, 2009 2:35 PM PST
December 5, 2009 1:11 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
TheNetGuy
As for wired services, he is also right. Cable is smart to take advantage of the additional marketing opportunities. The Bells will kick themselves for not taking advantage of the additional revenue. Network economies represent dramatic gains/loses due to operational leverage of the firm. We've seen this before with firms offering dialup at $9.99 to build their network.
Probably the most important is the competition for voice services. In the future, VoIP will be $20 a month with a boatload of features. The Bells and their monopoly position (and history of gouging consumers) is OVER. The cost to operate their networks is still substantial, but, if they can't get the voice and data part they may be in trouble as their fixed costs can't be covered by the volume of consumers they are carrying (as cable and competitive VoIP services offer consumers a choice).
In my opinion, the Bells are going to get what they deserve. They had a chance to survive on unbundled network elements and the selling of their services to competitors, but they blew it. They had a chance to sell the value of their network -- which would have spurred new innovation and lower cost for dialtone. It's unfortunate monopolies in the USA have caused this country to have fewer broadband services (or quality) than abroad.
- Dorman's figured it out
- by September 9, 2004 12:49 PM PDT
- I worked in Dorman's organization at Pacific Bell in the late 90s and remember his zeal. He's got this thing nailed!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)