Comments on: The citywide Wi-Fi reality check
Wireless technology tempts cities that want to offer low-cost broadband to residents, but operating a network is no walk in the park.
Wireless technology tempts cities that want to offer low-cost broadband to residents, but operating a network is no walk in the park.
November 24, 2009 11:08 PM PST
November 24, 2009 10:42 PM PST
November 24, 2009 2:59 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
On the otherhand I don't have a problem with providing free access. One way to offset the costs would be to allow organizations such as socalfreenet to put up wireless access points on government property. This a good solutions local government owns a lot of property and has existing fiber as well.
The technological problems involved in making Philly a wireless city are, I am certain, totally beside the point.
I have lived in Philly since 1974 -- I sincerely believe that the scheme is merely a way for city council to scare Comcast (the city's cable provider) and local telecommunications providers into paying serious money to make the wireless proposal go away.
Some twenty years ago, the City government took forever to decide on what company would be the city's cable TV provider. Comcast finally won out and went on to become HUGE. Many in city and state government profitted HUGELY from stock that was liberally strewn around Council, the mayor's office and Harrisburg by Comcast in its bid for the monopoly.
That was 20 years ago -- it's been a while, and the local pols smell the possibility of another HUGE payday. Believe me, Philly city council is not a a hotbed of technological visionaries. I suspect the extent of most members' interest in hardware begins and ends with Rolex watches.
- Technical accuracy, please
- by frnkblk May 28, 2005 8:57 PM PDT
- I believe Ms. Reardon is referring to 2.4 GHz, not MHz, and I know of no commercial garage door openers that use the 2.4 GHz frequency.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)Frank