Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7

Comments on: What threats does Skype face?

The Internet phone company's security chief takes stock of IM worms, encryption and other matters.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
security and media
by n3td3v January 2, 2007 4:59 AM PST
what roles do the media play in the security community? can the media infulence hackers and script kiddies into a trend or to make a trend more trendy, and therefore, be researched? this is the question i've always wondered. i have forever been under the impression the media have a huge infulence in whats going on in the underground. i would say this stuff and the media say their only reporting on whats going on, but i don't 100% believe its as clear vut as that. i've seen many instances of both cnet news and securityfocus news push a certain subject. the media need their headlines and advertising revenue for normal news headlines, but when its security news then i think the media should be extra responsible in not raising issues which don't need to be suggested to the underground of hackers. it is basically "hey hackers, we need our headlines, heres some background information from X company security expert now go hack them"... is basically the thought i go away with every time these kind of articles appear. i can't be the only person who reads the media and get the "we want to infulence the hackers" impression.
Reply to this comment
I agree
by Dachi January 2, 2007 5:43 AM PST
With the exception of say MS, who is always under the spotlight anyway, I would agree that articles like this touting a company?s extensive security measures/code auditing etc. really only serves to make the software a more lucrative platform to attack.
View reply
crime hasn't changed, neither has mass media brainwashing
by jabbotts January 2, 2007 7:58 AM PST
In short; my observation has been that mass media informs the end users who are the last people to know about a security threat. Anyone who would use a secirity threat for profit already knew about it long ago.

In long; crime is crime, it's not different if it's with a crowbar or keyboard. If your reading about something in the media, it's quite likely that the "underground" knew about it months ago. A news article on security threats doesn't instigate criminal activity, it notifies the lesser computer-literate end users who are usually the last to know.

My example of this is bump keys. A modern day skeliton key that can be made from a blank in about three ours of work and open any lock the blank fits into. The name "bump key" being derived from the tapping motion used to free the lock droppers so it opens. If you where in the criminal underground on the more educated side, I'm guessing you knew a year or more ago about this. If you where a geek online, you've seen the video of how to make and use bump keys around six months or more ago when it was going around the net. If you where a local news reporter, you published an article or news item on bump keys in the last six months (tv news did a spot one a slow news day four months ago or so). If you are the average home owner, you didn't have a clue until the mass media published or had a tv spot. Even then, it was one quick "oh, by the way" report in the scare segment of the broadcast.

The media told the public nothing they didn't already know. In this instance, the media told the security research and criminal communities nothing they didn't already know. If a flaw in Skype is found, it'll be nothing the security community didn't already know.

Media sways the general public. Look at how many americans believed Iraq had bio and nuclear weapons hidden away somewhere. Who where the people that continualy asked for evidence of this before invading a country over it's oil resources?

Among "underground" communities, there is generally a distain of mass media's lies and government BS in generall. There was nothing in the article blatantly challenging toward the hackers, secirty auditors or criminals other than that Skype is not currently known to be vaulterable and that the developers are using some good FOSS development processes even if they are not releaseing the source under GPL or any of the other hundred free software licenses.

Your use of "Hacker" when you actually ment computer enabled criminal is rather inaccurate. Criminals seek profit from any activity that provides high return with low effort. Hackers seek to further understand computer systems and push the limits of what can be done with them. Hackers and criminals use the same techniques with the difference being that the criminal now uses, for profit, what the Hacker originally discovered out of curiousity.

Using the term "Hacker" in this instance is pandoring to the media. "Quick, use the boogieman word of the month, we have to scare some readers in to clicking on the article. I know, put Hacker in the title and copy, that'll scare the hell out of anyone who doesn't actually know about the history of computers."

With a l33tsp33k alias like "n3td3v" you should really have a better grasp of this stuff. But then, l33tsp33k in normal conversation/writing is more of a ScriptKiddie thing.

My question has always been; how much do antivirus companies pay developers to build new viruses for them to gaurd against?
View reply
Skype threats?
by malis61 January 2, 2007 7:25 AM PST
Well their security chief may not admit to a problem, but there has to be some reason why when we downloaded Skype on to my computer, I ended up with one of those "Registry" malware infections and a serious boot problem, and had to actually use that last resort Restore function.
Reply to this comment
Not likely
by xcgeek January 2, 2007 7:34 AM PST
No offense, but if Skype did contain malware, THAT would be huge news, and skype would be make instant enemies with every single one of their users - something no legit company would risk. Isn't it more likely you got that malware from somewhere else, or perhaps a false positive.
View reply
Jajah.com is better than Skype
by hutchike January 2, 2007 9:46 AM PST
I use www.jajah.com because it calls your real home phone and makes the connection. I find the call quality is much better than Skype. When Skype can improve its connection quality, I might return to it.
Reply to this comment
Screw IT
by solrosenberg May 5, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
Corporate IT doesn't like Skype and other "consumer" applications because quite frankly they WORK and are easy to use, unlike the "enterprise software" crap IT guys use to justify their excessive salaries.
Reply to this comment
Screw newbies
by Ryo Hazuki January 12, 2007 10:37 AM PST
Yes, screw with the people responsable for keeping PC's around the world up and running, avoiding them (and others) to get infected.
That's a wise ideoligy.
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement