Version: 2008

Comments on: Symantec quietly hikes Norton renewal prices

People now pay more for annual subscription to Norton AntiVirus and other products. Is it a "last hurrah" before Microsoft's security push gets going?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)
What a joke...
by Heebee Jeebies October 12, 2005 3:25 PM PDT
Norton isn't even worth what they were asking for it. No way would I pay more for such sucky software. As for Microsoft why on Earth would I trust Microsoft with anti-spyware and anti-virus software when they put the security holes in the OS that allows these threats to flourish. That is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.

I will stick with PC-Cillin, at least it doesn't fight with other software and slow you system down.

Robert
Reply to this comment
What a joke...
by Heebee Jeebies October 12, 2005 3:25 PM PDT
Norton isn't even worth what they were asking for it. No way would I pay more for such sucky software. As for Microsoft why on Earth would I trust Microsoft with anti-spyware and anti-virus software when they put the security holes in the OS that allows these threats to flourish. That is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.

I will stick with PC-Cillin, at least it doesn't fight with other software and slow you system down.

Robert
Reply to this comment
Symantec Ripoff
by sam99999999 October 12, 2005 3:44 PM PDT
Symantec has been raising their subscription prices
at about 10x the rate of inflation for the past
several years. I remember when it cost $9.95 to
renew NAV for a year. But $29.95!?! Give me a
break.

When you think about it, you pay more to Symantec
than you do to Microsoft.

I for one will be one of the first on board with
Microsoft's offering. I'm also going to check out
ClamAV and some of the free/less expensive
products.
Reply to this comment
Alot of options
by Tiemmothi October 12, 2005 4:34 PM PDT
http://www.avast.com/ is very good.. but somewhat of a system
hog.

http://www.free-av.com/ is even better and not much of a
system hog at all.

both do much better jobs of catching things that norton dosent
even notice.
View reply
Which is why some users get LOW offers
by PolarUpgrade October 13, 2005 5:27 AM PDT
A few weeks ago the Symantec Store sent me an offer of NIS 2005 for just $10.00 U.S. I presume that was to sell out the old stock as v2006 is now for sale.

This implies that the firm is still seeking to hold its long term customers like me, who have been with the "Norton" products for say 15 years or more.

The pricing rejig at 30% more is actually a GOOD DEAL because you no longer have to shell out $70-$100 Cdn in Canada for a new NIS version every two years or so.

I think Symantec is just trying to adjust to MS's likely model.

Here in Canada MS seems to be offering Web-based Outlook and a similar all-MSN email package on the Web for about $129-$169 Cdn a year. So I would guess MS OneCare is gonna follow that pricing. Sure, there will be a little Web space included for backups, but Symantec's product I predict will look well-priced in comparison to One[big price]Care.

Good going Symantec!
Symantec Ripoff
by sam99999999 October 12, 2005 3:44 PM PDT
Symantec has been raising their subscription prices
at about 10x the rate of inflation for the past
several years. I remember when it cost $9.95 to
renew NAV for a year. But $29.95!?! Give me a
break.

When you think about it, you pay more to Symantec
than you do to Microsoft.

I for one will be one of the first on board with
Microsoft's offering. I'm also going to check out
ClamAV and some of the free/less expensive
products.
Reply to this comment
Alot of options
by Tiemmothi October 12, 2005 4:34 PM PDT
http://www.avast.com/ is very good.. but somewhat of a system
hog.

http://www.free-av.com/ is even better and not much of a
system hog at all.

both do much better jobs of catching things that norton dosent
even notice.
View reply
Which is why some users get LOW offers
by PolarUpgrade October 13, 2005 5:27 AM PDT
A few weeks ago the Symantec Store sent me an offer of NIS 2005 for just $10.00 U.S. I presume that was to sell out the old stock as v2006 is now for sale.

This implies that the firm is still seeking to hold its long term customers like me, who have been with the "Norton" products for say 15 years or more.

The pricing rejig at 30% more is actually a GOOD DEAL because you no longer have to shell out $70-$100 Cdn in Canada for a new NIS version every two years or so.

I think Symantec is just trying to adjust to MS's likely model.

Here in Canada MS seems to be offering Web-based Outlook and a similar all-MSN email package on the Web for about $129-$169 Cdn a year. So I would guess MS OneCare is gonna follow that pricing. Sure, there will be a little Web space included for backups, but Symantec's product I predict will look well-priced in comparison to One[big price]Care.

Good going Symantec!
I have paid not to use Symantec
by cscoder October 12, 2005 6:21 PM PDT
For up to a year, I (probably) was getting signature downloads for the wrong OS, on a subscription renewal I paid for. At the time I renewed it was for the XP os, when next renewal time came a year later, it was for the Palm OS. So likely my scans had been useless for up to a year. Will never know. Email to the published support address bounced. Couldn't contact by phone - life is too short. Finally found out by searching web my version of NAV had been discontinued.

Symantec couldn't find me to tell me that the product was being discontinued, but they could find me to send the wrong update files and hock me for a renewal to the wrong product. Had to track down and download a special program to uninstall NAV.

That's just the last and most outrageous incident over many years of bad experiences of one sort or another both as a home user and consultant with Norton and then Symantec products. I'm glad to say I've never paid for a Symantec product, just renewals on installed ones. Now I won't use them, period.
Reply to this comment
sorry
by October 13, 2005 7:41 AM PDT
That sucks man. I sympathize with you. That's why I never pay for any AV. They can rip ya off so easily. I always use trial versions and web based scanning, such as from Trend Micro. It may not be the best, but atleast it's a little. But I always notice when there is a virus/trojan/worm on my computer, and I can remove it manually.. I don't have to rely on AV to remove them for me
View reply
I have paid not to use Symantec
by cscoder October 12, 2005 6:21 PM PDT
For up to a year, I (probably) was getting signature downloads for the wrong OS, on a subscription renewal I paid for. At the time I renewed it was for the XP os, when next renewal time came a year later, it was for the Palm OS. So likely my scans had been useless for up to a year. Will never know. Email to the published support address bounced. Couldn't contact by phone - life is too short. Finally found out by searching web my version of NAV had been discontinued.

Symantec couldn't find me to tell me that the product was being discontinued, but they could find me to send the wrong update files and hock me for a renewal to the wrong product. Had to track down and download a special program to uninstall NAV.

That's just the last and most outrageous incident over many years of bad experiences of one sort or another both as a home user and consultant with Norton and then Symantec products. I'm glad to say I've never paid for a Symantec product, just renewals on installed ones. Now I won't use them, period.
Reply to this comment
sorry
by October 13, 2005 7:41 AM PDT
That sucks man. I sympathize with you. That's why I never pay for any AV. They can rip ya off so easily. I always use trial versions and web based scanning, such as from Trend Micro. It may not be the best, but atleast it's a little. But I always notice when there is a virus/trojan/worm on my computer, and I can remove it manually.. I don't have to rely on AV to remove them for me
View reply
NOD32 AV Works Better
by WITechGuy October 12, 2005 11:29 PM PDT
I dumped Norton AV from all my computers 5 years ago & went with NOD32 by eset.

It works a hell of alot better then Norton plus blocks more virus,torjons,spyware before they even getting a chance to hit the internet.

If I was you I would dump Norton AV & SAVE with NOD32 AV that works alot better without slowing your system down.

More Information can be found at http://nod32.com
Reply to this comment
NOD32 AV Works Better
by WITechGuy October 12, 2005 11:29 PM PDT
I dumped Norton AV from all my computers 5 years ago & went with NOD32 by eset.

It works a hell of alot better then Norton plus blocks more virus,torjons,spyware before they even getting a chance to hit the internet.

If I was you I would dump Norton AV & SAVE with NOD32 AV that works alot better without slowing your system down.

More Information can be found at http://nod32.com
Reply to this comment
Subscription ripoff!
by October 13, 2005 6:36 AM PDT
When all the major antivirus vendors went to subscription services virus writers went in to overdrive. They knew that most people will not pay a yearly subscription. Everyone I know uses up the free or first year then either finds a free service such as AVG or simply uses the outdated dat files. Since most folks prior to XP usually do a yearly re-install anyway this automatically resets Nortons subscription service so in the past I've never paid for it anyway. On my XP machine I'm going to rip it out and install something else. It might be different if they gave the product away with a free 3 month trial and an uninstall option that actually uninstalled it, then charged a yearly subscription however, they don't. It's the highest priced AV package on the store shelf. You pay a larger upfront cost and a larger yearly subscription fee and the only way their going to survive is by using the court systems of the world such as the recent EU interest in Microsoft's bundling of AV products.
Reply to this comment
Subscription ripoff!
by October 13, 2005 6:36 AM PDT
When all the major antivirus vendors went to subscription services virus writers went in to overdrive. They knew that most people will not pay a yearly subscription. Everyone I know uses up the free or first year then either finds a free service such as AVG or simply uses the outdated dat files. Since most folks prior to XP usually do a yearly re-install anyway this automatically resets Nortons subscription service so in the past I've never paid for it anyway. On my XP machine I'm going to rip it out and install something else. It might be different if they gave the product away with a free 3 month trial and an uninstall option that actually uninstalled it, then charged a yearly subscription however, they don't. It's the highest priced AV package on the store shelf. You pay a larger upfront cost and a larger yearly subscription fee and the only way their going to survive is by using the court systems of the world such as the recent EU interest in Microsoft's bundling of AV products.
Reply to this comment
Update Symantec for FREE!!!
by SL-INC. October 13, 2005 7:11 AM PDT
All Norton / Symantec product have one thing in common and inherent bug. What is this BUG you may ask?

Most of you get told that your "Subscription" has run out and have to pay $29.99+ to renew it for a year. First off, you can ALWAYS download the Virus Updates for free (http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/download/pages/US-N95.html). The thing here is that will only cover the Antivirus, but what if you need other updates. We all know that Symantec does not provide these too freely and you have to use the "Live Update" feature to get them. The cure you ask.

Set your PC Clock back one (1) year, and then run the Live Update... The bug in Norton will think you just / recently installed the software. Live Update will now function normally and get all your updates.

When done, simply set your clock / year back to the proper date.

At last if you have to use a Symantec product, this will get you by until you find something else.
Reply to this comment
Update Symantec for FREE!!!
by SL-INC. October 13, 2005 7:11 AM PDT
All Norton / Symantec product have one thing in common and inherent bug. What is this BUG you may ask?

Most of you get told that your "Subscription" has run out and have to pay $29.99+ to renew it for a year. First off, you can ALWAYS download the Virus Updates for free (http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/download/pages/US-N95.html). The thing here is that will only cover the Antivirus, but what if you need other updates. We all know that Symantec does not provide these too freely and you have to use the "Live Update" feature to get them. The cure you ask.

Set your PC Clock back one (1) year, and then run the Live Update... The bug in Norton will think you just / recently installed the software. Live Update will now function normally and get all your updates.

When done, simply set your clock / year back to the proper date.

At last if you have to use a Symantec product, this will get you by until you find something else.
Reply to this comment
Freeware is as good
by pentium4forever October 13, 2005 3:23 PM PDT
Heh, heh. Mcafee I used to use and then when version 8.0 rolled out, I knew it was getting too bloated. It slowed my system startup and my system in general noticeably. That's when I looked for freeware and came upon AVG Antivirus. I've read reports of AVG not being as accurate as NAV, but it works great for the most part and it's FREE! Norton I know is a huge piece of bloated software, not sure if it's more bloated than McAfee but there's always freeware such as AVG and Avast.
Reply to this comment
Freeware is as good
by pentium4forever October 13, 2005 3:23 PM PDT
Heh, heh. Mcafee I used to use and then when version 8.0 rolled out, I knew it was getting too bloated. It slowed my system startup and my system in general noticeably. That's when I looked for freeware and came upon AVG Antivirus. I've read reports of AVG not being as accurate as NAV, but it works great for the most part and it's FREE! Norton I know is a huge piece of bloated software, not sure if it's more bloated than McAfee but there's always freeware such as AVG and Avast.
Reply to this comment
Actually, don't consider Microsoft
by sam99999999 October 14, 2005 10:51 AM PDT
I read everyone's comments, and as opposed to what I said earlier I will not consider using Microsoft's anti-virus product if one ever comes out.

It really would irk me to pay Microsoft for a service that is necessary because their architecture permits this abominable situation.

Dvorak wrote a funny column on it this month:

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1869377,00.asp

So I wanted to thank everyone who recommended the free alternatives above.

Neal
Reply to this comment
Actually, don't consider Microsoft
by sam99999999 October 14, 2005 10:51 AM PDT
I read everyone's comments, and as opposed to what I said earlier I will not consider using Microsoft's anti-virus product if one ever comes out.

It really would irk me to pay Microsoft for a service that is necessary because their architecture permits this abominable situation.

Dvorak wrote a funny column on it this month:

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1869377,00.asp

So I wanted to thank everyone who recommended the free alternatives above.

Neal
Reply to this comment
Symantec Hikes Renewal Prices
by mn19521 October 27, 2005 8:28 PM PDT
It seems that once a large company reaches a certain size, then the home user matters little. I am having a problem with Internet Security and have been all over Symantec's web site and writing to find some one who could help - nothing. They used to have an 800 number to India which at the time drove me crazy trying to find someone who could understand the problem rather than using a script to provide responses no matter what the question. Boy would I like that opportunity back. And now this. Ten dollars isn't much, but the way Symantec is treating its customers, me, it is a fortune. I will be voting with my feet. I am currently looking to replace my security software from Symantec and I think I have succeeded. Only time will tell, but I will not be renewing my Symantec licenses.
Reply to this comment
Symantec Hikes Renewal Prices
by mn19521 October 27, 2005 8:28 PM PDT
It seems that once a large company reaches a certain size, then the home user matters little. I am having a problem with Internet Security and have been all over Symantec's web site and writing to find some one who could help - nothing. They used to have an 800 number to India which at the time drove me crazy trying to find someone who could understand the problem rather than using a script to provide responses no matter what the question. Boy would I like that opportunity back. And now this. Ten dollars isn't much, but the way Symantec is treating its customers, me, it is a fortune. I will be voting with my feet. I am currently looking to replace my security software from Symantec and I think I have succeeded. Only time will tell, but I will not be renewing my Symantec licenses.
Reply to this comment
Norton products price hike
by PeterAlan602 December 22, 2006 9:52 AM PST
I've just tried to renew my NAV 2006 subscription but Symantec want £42 (over $70) to renew compared with my last renewal price of £19. I have kept with NAV for the past 5 years but there is no way I?m going to pay this much when there are highly competitive products out there. Sorry Norton but you have got too greedy.
Reply to this comment
Norton products price hike
by PeterAlan602 December 22, 2006 9:52 AM PST
I've just tried to renew my NAV 2006 subscription but Symantec want £42 (over $70) to renew compared with my last renewal price of £19. I have kept with NAV for the past 5 years but there is no way I?m going to pay this much when there are highly competitive products out there. Sorry Norton but you have got too greedy.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement