Version: 2008

Comments on: CIA: Cyberattack caused multiple-city blackout

Security agency breaks its normal silence, warning about successful attacks against critical national infrastructures outside the U.S.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Also from the CIA
by inachu January 22, 2008 8:25 AM PST
Also documented proof that the CIA poisoned drinking well water so as to document mass confusion and such if USA ever came under attack.
Reply to this comment
where?
by jltnol January 22, 2008 8:50 AM PST
WHAT cities? None are listed, no details are given. Nothing can be
checked or verified. I've learned a very long time ago that just
because someone says something, doesn't make it true. (Does "Iraq
has weapons of mass destruction" ring a bell?)

With the low level of trust of anything government these days, this
report seems like pure FUD to me.
View reply
Loosen the tinfoil helmet...
by ejevo January 22, 2008 9:00 AM PST
... your cranium isn't getting enough oxygen.
Reply to this comment
The CIA also said there were WMD in Iraq
by zmonster January 22, 2008 9:40 AM PST
Why should anyone believe them on this matter? The odds of a
hacker being able to shut down a power grid are minimal, and
even if they did succeed it would be a simple matter to bring the
power grid back up. This is hardly a threat, and hardly news.
What is more worrisome is will the Bush Administration use the
'fear' generated by this story to take control of, and disable, the
Internet to 'keep us safe'? We should be far more worried about
that, than a couple of hackers flipping a switch OFF that can be
turned back ON in a matter of seconds.
Reply to this comment
Weird diversion
by Phillep_H January 22, 2008 9:58 AM PST
WMDs were just one of several reasons for going into Iraq. The White House website has the speeches given. Look at the original information instead of the 2nd hand coverage by people who hate his guts.

In addition, even Saddam's generals thought they had huge bunkers full of poison gas, etc, and were shocked to discover it was not so. Saddam was an incompetent meglomaniac who relied on being able to terrorise to stay in power.

The power grid is much more fragile than you might think, and the total cost of all the different minor expenses resulting from it being knocked down is pretty high. "A million here, a million there... Pretty soon you're talking about big money."

Considering what governments (all governments, not just "Bushitler", etc) do to everything they gain control of, I don't want them anywhere near the internet. To my thinking, this indicates the utilities need to spend money to prevent problems. Considering how greedy the owning/controlling companies are... I am not hopeful.
View all 2 replies
FEAR
by PearlProAudio January 22, 2008 11:17 PM PST
Isnt most the things the CIA does about generating fear, fear of terror, fear of eavesdropping, fear of Osama Done Nothing....thats why they spread these typs of fear stories to induce a more passive public to think the Internet is bad and should be turned off. Remember the matrix is all around you...
Oops, NOT the United States' power grid.
by Phillep_H January 23, 2008 4:15 PM PST
Go to the original documents. The power grids having problems are in other countries, not the US.

Well, not yet. Some people I correspond with have worked for power companies, and they are pessimistic about the grid's resilience.
Here we go
by wildchild_plasma_gyro January 22, 2008 10:07 AM PST
It's been designed well for resilience in plain view but outside of control by me (man that is).
Also it seems like i just had my nights sleep in the wrong town.
Year down with the CIA
Reply to this comment
No obvious questions?
by Daimyo- January 22, 2008 1:05 PM PST
Why don't these "reporters" ask obvious questions like:

WHY IS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLUGGED INTO THE INTERNET?!?!?!

Obviously the intelligence agencies are putting fear in the citizens to get their way. Provide facts and details or lets just write it off as propaganda.
Reply to this comment
Die Hard 4 comes alive!!!
by hunter_jc January 22, 2008 2:40 PM PST
Maybe Maggie Q is in this too. Well we can only dream.
Reply to this comment
Do the Google news search.
by cyberbian January 22, 2008 10:15 PM PST
I thought the refusal to name names was suspicious and hinted at disinformation.

A Google news search makes this credible to me!

You cannot hide what is already public knowledge. It only leaves to speculation, how many players are active in this cyberwar. I make out at least two based on my presumption that all blackouts searched are player generated.

I speculate that where two are obvious, more are in play.
Reply to this comment
Did you really expect them to announce WWIII has begun!
by cyberbian January 22, 2008 10:22 PM PST
The most obvious reason that the CIA would hide the targets is that it reveals the identitys of the attackers.

If you knew the player roster, you might realize that WWIII is underway!
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement