Comments on: CIA: Cyberattack caused multiple-city blackout
Security agency breaks its normal silence, warning about successful attacks against critical national infrastructures outside the U.S.
Security agency breaks its normal silence, warning about successful attacks against critical national infrastructures outside the U.S.
January 1, 2010 7:31 AM PST
January 1, 2010 4:00 AM PST
December 31, 2009 5:30 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
checked or verified. I've learned a very long time ago that just
because someone says something, doesn't make it true. (Does "Iraq
has weapons of mass destruction" ring a bell?)
With the low level of trust of anything government these days, this
report seems like pure FUD to me.
hacker being able to shut down a power grid are minimal, and
even if they did succeed it would be a simple matter to bring the
power grid back up. This is hardly a threat, and hardly news.
What is more worrisome is will the Bush Administration use the
'fear' generated by this story to take control of, and disable, the
Internet to 'keep us safe'? We should be far more worried about
that, than a couple of hackers flipping a switch OFF that can be
turned back ON in a matter of seconds.
In addition, even Saddam's generals thought they had huge bunkers full of poison gas, etc, and were shocked to discover it was not so. Saddam was an incompetent meglomaniac who relied on being able to terrorise to stay in power.
The power grid is much more fragile than you might think, and the total cost of all the different minor expenses resulting from it being knocked down is pretty high. "A million here, a million there... Pretty soon you're talking about big money."
Considering what governments (all governments, not just "Bushitler", etc) do to everything they gain control of, I don't want them anywhere near the internet. To my thinking, this indicates the utilities need to spend money to prevent problems. Considering how greedy the owning/controlling companies are... I am not hopeful.
Well, not yet. Some people I correspond with have worked for power companies, and they are pessimistic about the grid's resilience.
Also it seems like i just had my nights sleep in the wrong town.
Year down with the CIA
WHY IS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLUGGED INTO THE INTERNET?!?!?!
Obviously the intelligence agencies are putting fear in the citizens to get their way. Provide facts and details or lets just write it off as propaganda.
- Do the Google news search.
- by cyberbian January 22, 2008 10:15 PM PST
- I thought the refusal to name names was suspicious and hinted at disinformation.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Did you really expect them to announce WWIII has begun!
- by cyberbian January 22, 2008 10:22 PM PST
- The most obvious reason that the CIA would hide the targets is that it reveals the identitys of the attackers.
- Like this
-
(19 Comments)A Google news search makes this credible to me!
You cannot hide what is already public knowledge. It only leaves to speculation, how many players are active in this cyberwar. I make out at least two based on my presumption that all blackouts searched are player generated.
I speculate that where two are obvious, more are in play.
If you knew the player roster, you might realize that WWIII is underway!