Comments on: Microsoft exec calls XP hack 'frightening'
In a matter of minutes, e-crime experts hack into a Windows XP computer that is unprotected and connected to an unsecured wireless network.
In a matter of minutes, e-crime experts hack into a Windows XP computer that is unprotected and connected to an unsecured wireless network.
January 5, 2010 7:48 PM PST
January 5, 2010 6:00 PM PST
January 5, 2010 5:27 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Lets look at this:
1-They tested XP SP1 (probably XP home although it is not clear). You remember, the new revolutionary safe and secure upgrade from Windows ME! We will call this the Post Release Beta.
2-No updates, no security software, no nothing just the base OS.
3-While they fell short of saying everyone should move to Vista, that was clearly the intent.
4-I wonder, if Vista had been meeting it's sales numbers would this joke of a demo been done, much less reported?
5-Finally, the fact that at the end of the article CNET states that SP2 includes a firewall that would have either thwarted or at least slowed down the attack, why shouldn't everyone wait for Vista SP2 before buying it?????
I now love XP, It will take a long time for me to embrace Vista.
I know 'rootkit' writers try to get their driver in the kernel, but what if the kernel has drivers already there which make it far easier?
Some of the 'attack vectors' are in plain sight, like an easy google or even in pc mags. They do not say they are 'vectors'. You have to think like me. Is that an potential 'attack vector' and how could a creative hacker use it to get root on this or that?
When first reading pc architecture, I asked a programmer if some scary ideas were possible if the hacker could do x,y,or z, He sadly said 'yes indeed'. I never would tell anyone those things but i am no genius nor hacker. Someone will figure out not only the concepts but how-or maybe worse ones. Not if but when.
Time for board designers to go back to the drawing board, get os drivers out of the kernel that makes cracking easier. When vendors chose the 'clamors of the masses for glitzy, fun convenient tech',they did so IMO niavely.
I choose security over 'that tom foolery', but I see no architecture nor os that is not just a bunch of attack vectors, online or off. There is only one way I know to code a secure pc,but the security lifespan of even old architecture is limited. The vendors are not to blame. They are in business. We have no one to blame but our selves.
If you think of all the bright minds which gave us our hard ware, only to see it go up in smoke,it is nauseating. Anyone who thinks security is possible is living in a fantasy land.Products sold for security help some, but any sales person who is not honest about the limits of their devices/hardware is a'snake oil salemen'. No, the ms corp guy is right.
New security ideas I have read about are pretty limp. ONLY A RADICAL NEW BOARD/hard drive,os WILL DO. Sorry intel,Ms,etc a 'greedy ignorant society' has compromised your efforts.
blu
i
The only reason the MS Exec would be "frightened" is that everyone doesn't already have VISTA installed. No thanks, I've seen Vista in action, sure it's purdy, but I've upgraded computers using it to a minimum of 2GB of memory for it to work worth a damn. I have seen it gobble up memory and resources faster than Britney Spears on a trip to Vegas. My XP and Media Center work just fine thank you very much. They putter along on my secured wifi network, behind firewalls, 2 routers, and robust up-to-date Internet Security and Anti-virus suites, thank you very much.
I suggest doing some research on wireless auditing before making such bold claims.
Doug Norton
PLC Systems, Whitby Ontario
They should try hacking my machine with XP Pro SP2, Webroot Desktop Firewall (in stealth mode), Webroot Spy Sweeper with Antivirus (with all shields enabled), and Diamond CS's Process Guard (with Protection enabled, Execution protection enabled, and "Block new and changed applications" enabled.)
Also, with Secunia's PSI enabled and reporting all my software secured and up to date.
Also, with MBSA reporting strong security.
Also, with Belarc's Advisor reporting Antivirus up to date and Windows Security updates up to date.
All my home PC's are cabled and the router has it's wifi disabled.
Even so, Belarc's Advisor warns me my PC only scores 3.83 of 10 on its CIS benchmark score, so I still have some work to do.
But, geeze people, yes, if you leave your PC completely unsecured, of course hackers can get in.
If you want a real gasp, watch a visitor at your house bring up FireFox and click on Tools, Options, Security tab, Show Passwords button, then click on the next Show passwords button and click on Yes when prompted. Or did none of you know that FireFox could display all your browser saved passwords to anyone sitting at the keyboard?
Just like your house and car, if you want to keep strangers out, you have to lock the doors. And even that is probably only going to keep the honest people out anyway. It'll only slow down the others a little bit - hopefully enough to make them pick an easier target. And don't ever let anyone sit at your PC while you're not watching.
switch to Vista. Getting very desperate M$!!
Face it, no one wants Vista. My next OS upgrade will be a switch to
Apple's OS X.
I'm for one sick and tired of folks blowing things out of the normal realm to sell vista.
Tell them to hack a fully loaded pc with 256 bit encryption at the server lvl for wireless, and desk top fully up to date on all updates.
Than I'll pay attention to this kind of garbage.
You'd be a fool not to realize the scale and scope of the war Apple and its very full coffers are beginning to wage.
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2007/11/securitymatters_1115
Back On Topic:
See the discussion on ZDNet about M$'s "fear" here:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6218238.html
vista on people.
Vista worst OS in my opinion
I don't think you've even used it, "aplcomputer"
2006 http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?NewsID=5535
2005 http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,123714-page,1/article.html?RSS=RSS
Note that in both 2005 and in 2006, similar stories to this one just recently posted also appeared... but yet a MS Exec is "enlightened and frightened"?!?!?!
Can't their Exec's read? (* CHUCKLE *)
Don't their Exec's read? (* ROFLOL *)
This just gets funnier the more I read this.
But to attempt to keep it serious... Windows Operating Systems... ALL OF THEM... are insecure in their unprotected form! Including Vista!!!
Walt
Time to think about why this story is out there in the first place.
It's not hard to figure out. Follow along:
1. Windows XP is insecure. See how easy it is to hack? Oooo... SCARY!
2. Luckily, Windows Vista is available!
3. Please go buy Windows Vista. Thanks for your business!
- Hamster hacks C64
- by Hamster Trainer November 19, 2007 11:38 AM PST
- In other news... a military-trained hamster hacked into an unsecured Commodore 64.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 4 pages (181 Comments)Pentagon officials are flabbergasted at the "1337 skillz" of the bio-silicon enhanced hamster with an IQ of 5 points over human average.
The Pentagon has promptly hired Microsoft to create a new operating system. Microsoft excitedly informed us that they already have FIVE DIFFERENT VERSIONS of the OS ready to sell for 1,000 Euros per version!
[ Cut to a mass-cheering scene from "1984" ]