Comments on: Google: 10 percent of sites are dangerous

Sophos adds that 70 percent of pages hosting malicious software are found on legitimate sites targeted by hackers.

[RompStar_420]

That's why I use Opera

In opera you can turn off:

Java, Java Script, Plugins, pretty much everything, so that the browser is processing only HTML, basics, and you can enbed things like that in straight HTML, only that is read and everything else is thrown out. No other browser allows for this that easily to be done to my knowledged, that's why Opera is my choice for a web browser.

[donjonson]

but..

doesn't turning off all scripts and such really detract from your web browsing experience? many sites dont work properly unless all that is turned on.

[thartist026]

Uhm. Actually

The news headline should actually read that 10% of sites Google LINKS to are dangerous due to click fraud.

[donjonson]

So how do we guard oursleves from this?

This is good to know but what does the average user do to protect themselves? I use firefox is that good enough?

[i_made_this]

don

the firefox add-on you'll find at = www customizegoogle dot com is a good start

[Stating]

Noscript, Antispyware/Malware

If you use Firefox, then you should use the Noscript add-on. My default for any site is scripting turned off. I only allow trusted sites to use scripting. This may not be a perfect solution, but it is better than running "naked". I also run ZoneAlarm anti-spyware/virus, and Windows Defender. Again, not perfect, but there is only so much you can do without completely impairing the web experience.

If you are eally fanatic, I suppose you could only run your browser in a virtual machine by using VMWare or equivalent. After each browser session, purge the virtual machine and replace it with a virgin virtual machine. Any malware that you might have picked up during the last session will be destroyed. If you have kids using a computer, you either need to use this technique, or have them run the browser under hardened Linux.

[fc11]

For IE user: Use high security in "internet" zone

Harden IE:
1. Tools -> Internet options -> Secuirty -> Internet -> custom level -> "reset to" select "high" -> clieck "reset"
2. In this above dialog fox, select "downloads" -> File download -> Enable
This will disable everything including javascript, java, etc.
The only catch is that if you need to view a pdf file, you need to save it locally and then open it. But I have been using this setting for years (since year 2001) visiting all sorts of web sites without any virus probelms.
3. Internet options -> Secuirty -> Intranet -> custom level -> "reset to" select "medium high" -> clieck "reset"

For a few trusted web site that require javascript, you can add it to intranet zone.

ALso do:
Keep computer up-to-date with WIndows update.

[Anon-Y-mous]

0% Dangerous if you use a Mac.

Problem solved

[Macsaresafer]

That's why CNET keeps the report vague.

'one in 10 Web pages could successfully "drive-by download" a
Trojan horse virus onto a visitor's computer.'

To what kind of computer could it download the trojan? Why a
Windows computer, of course! Cnet doesn't want to upset MS
though, so they won't report on that fact.

[angelopc]

Keep pushing Macs. Eventually, you'll end-up in the same boat as PC users. Macs are no more secure than PCs, it's just that they don't have the market share needed for malware programmers to target them...yet.

[Larry Launstein Jr]

Google's alliance with StopBadware.org - a major problem brewing

One of my client's sites, Durand Railroad Days, got flagged with a warning page that pretty much blocked people from visiting that site from Google.

I consider this to be heavy-handed and unfair. Why should I or my clients have to suffer the consequences of someone illegally hacking into my clients or my own server space?

They could be taking a leadership role by working with designers and hosts like myself. Instead, they put up an arbitrary warning page, which runs the risk of damaging the reputation of the client or designer. They have also been singling out hosts. They should be working with these people, not at them!

Another thing: All my clients have contact information on their sites, and I have my web address on all. There is no reason why they cannot contact the client or myself directly to inform us of the problem, what the problem is, and what needs to be done to fix it. Sure, every solution is different. But if Google and StopBadware are really interested in being responsible, they will go the extra mile here, instead of putting arbitrary warnings on a link to a site.

I don't like having my reputation slammed, nor that of my clients, and I go to great pains to encourage people to learn more about identity theft and malicious software, viruses, worms, and Trojan horses.

BTW: I run a Mac. But they can also get inflicted, especially the new ones that can run both Windows and Mac software.

[Siegfried Schtauffen]

SiteAdvisor

I have a similar problem, but it is with SiteAdvisor. They have no problem with my content, but I was linking to a site that they classed as bad. While I removed the link soon after, three months later they haven't updated their report, even though they assured me that they would do it last month.

More transperancy is needed with sites like these.

[the editor]

Really?

I no longer trust Google for anything. They have now put themselves as the "High Priests" of the Internet. All the while they do not index most Websites unless paid to do so> How can anybody trust one search engine against the hundreds ones that get better results. If you have enough money then you are indexed by Google. Money buys fake publicity that the public buy into without even doing any research. I know this first hand since our non-profit website was paying for someone to do our indexing. All was wonderful until we could not longer pay. Suddenly out traffic went through the roof as other search engines indexed our Website for free. Do not listen to the billion dollar boys at Google tell you they are the "police" of the Internet. All they know how to do is count your dollars as you pour them over to their sponsors and indexers that pay Google. What a load of bull!!

[Dean_Ansari]

Well said - try Anoox search engine for relief

I could not agree more with what you have written about Google. I just wished more people would realize what you have found out. That Google in fact far from being a un-biased source of information, search engine, is in fact very biased by money considerations.

Try AnooX search engine if you want to be free from the noose of Google & Yahoo. Because it is a search engine that is powered by the People, it is Open source and Not-for-profit. Here:
www.anoox.com

[Dean_Ansari]

That is why I use Oxygen browser

Want to be free of being Hacked by malicious web sites, either switch to Mac or if you are on Windows as I am, as 98% of people are, use Oxygen web browser by Netdive. You can download it for free here:
http://www.netdive.com/oxygen/download.htm

Oxygen is free, and best of all it is fast, since it is not loaded with junk/extra software as IE or FF are.

Cheerio :)

[Siegfried Schtauffen]

Why can't you just pay for ads?

No one cares about your companies. Face it.

[Ted Miller]

Interesting...

due to the fact that many dangerous sites are sponsered by Google. I am not picking on google itself, I do use their search engine and I do not mean that stupid toolbar they try to keep shoving down my throat. As a matter of fact most dangerous sites are recieved after a person downloads a toolbar of sorts. WHY IS GOOGLE FOLLOWING THIS PATH?

[red541]

Software can prevent

There are numerous software titles out there that help prevent this type of
malicious software from attacking your computer.  If your computer is
infected and you know the website where the software came from then a swift
notice to their
web hosting provider would be in order

[rbphacker]

Well the url to this page under a google search for this warning, is also restricted. Try it yourself.

[rbphacker]

It appears Google has run into a problem with it's warning system and all results were flagged for a short time this morning.

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=7e70d6afa49a8ada&hl=en