Comments on: Hacking for dollars
These days, attackers are motivated more by money than the desire to write disruptive worms like Sasser.
These days, attackers are motivated more by money than the desire to write disruptive worms like Sasser.
December 5, 2009 4:54 PM PST
December 5, 2009 2:35 PM PST
December 5, 2009 1:11 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Not once did the reporter produce any evidence other than what they said. No contact to law enforcement to back up anything that was said.
Aside from this, the term "hacker" appears to have changed (and no, I'm not debating hacker vs. cracker). In the past it was considered someone who used technical means to circumvent security. By their definition, it's someone who sends an email from a bogus address, or establishes a server front end to gather information from the very, very gullable. By this definition, any spammer could be considered a "Hacker". This being the case, the author and indeed the companies portrayed here show their ignorance of security, IT, and in general, the subjects that they're speaking of.
Their ignorance, combined with their commercial interests make this one of the most suspect articles written by an amateur I have seen on C/Net for quite some time, and that's saying a lot.
Must be a slow day at c|net...
- State Sponsored Hacking
- by Stating July 6, 2005 2:14 PM PDT
- Not to be overlooked is the considerable amount of State sanctioned/sponsored hacking. I've detected a fair number of intrusion attempts hitting my router from China. Given that China has a complete lockdown on their citizen's use of the Internet -- access control, logging everything everywhere, they are not oblivious to what is going on. Which either means they don't care, as long as other countries are hacked and not China itself, or they are actively sponsoring this activity to engage in espionage, theft, or disruption of other countries' infrastructure. I'd like to see CNET do a future story on what our "friendly" trading partners are doing to us, and what governemnt officials from agencies like Homeland Security have to say about it.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- State Sponsored Hacking
- by July 6, 2005 3:19 PM PDT
- ..I don't think that this is really true.
- Like this View reply
Processing -
(10 Comments)Examples of attacks:
Jul 06, 2005 20:37:31.671 UTC - (UDP) 222.136.251.125 : 49451
Calendar Protocol
descr: CNCGROUP Henan province network
descr: China Network Communications Group
descr: Beijing 100031
Jul 06, 2005 20:25:43.687 UTC - (UDP) 210.74.232.191 : 1261
SQL Slammer Worm
descr: Shanghai Global Network Co.,Ltd
descr: No.111 Zhongshan South Road
Jul 06, 2005 19:42:50.093 UTC - (UDP) 218.23.142.22 : 3987
SQL Slammer Worm
descr: CHINANET Anhui province network
descr: Data Communication Division
descr: China Telecom
Keith
www.techcando.com
Keep in mind, they're behind content filters, not firewalls. Being infected by a worm, and it spreading over to here isn't neccisarily state sponsored hacking.
Remember, China has an enormous software piracy economy. Patches generally aren't available to a lot of these people. How many of these are coming from China? How about Brazil? Pakistan? Any other countries?
Besides, if it were state sponored hacking, don't you think they'd give them something a little better than a 4 year old worm to do it with?