Comments on: Police Blotter: MySpace profile becomes part of rape conviction
Man charged with statutory rape wants to use as evidence victim's MySpace.com page that falsely claimed she was 18 years old.
Man charged with statutory rape wants to use as evidence victim's MySpace.com page that falsely claimed she was 18 years old.
December 30, 2009 5:38 PM PST
December 30, 2009 4:57 PM PST
December 30, 2009 4:14 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Now I am not defending this guy, because rape is just flat out wrong... but the myspace page does sound like it would be relevant in this case. If these girls are going around posing as 18 on the internet, dressing all ****** and crap like a lot of teeny booper girls do on myspace... then how is one to know their true age? I've seen some girls who I would have swore was 19 or 20 and amazed that they were 14 or 15... it's crazy now. I don't remember girls looking like that when I was 16.
I would love to know how well the parents knew this guy... also, how old was Gaskins at the time? Article doesn't say.
Seriously *** were the parents thinking letting their kids sleep over?
The parents are at fault, I'd never let my kids sleep over at an adult's house like that.
I agree the parents should be held accountable as well. The problem is its not always a crime to have bad judgement as a parent. I think what the court is punishing this guy for is the being wreckless part. Basically he didn't make the effort to confirm the age before any action took place.
By the way, I saw a waitress a few weeks ago who looked 14 to me, she said she was 22. I can't tell anymore. 14 to 25 - I can't tell the differences anymore. But that's not an excuse to play dumb and get some out of bounds nookie.
The myspace try got him some press, but it sounds to me like his lawyer got tired of arguing with his client about submitting it and so did it anyway.
Parents need to get back into the game and pay attention to what their kids are doing for God's Sake.
I mean it might seem a bit less shocking if he had a daughter they went to school with, or were friends with, but even then I doubt I'd have allowed it if they were my children.
Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
I have a friend that has a daughter that's 11 and one fine day while I was cleaning out her machine of spyware, I ran into some pictures her daughter took of herself and her cousin and OMG! I immediately told my friend, "These pictures are not the kinds of pictures an 11 year old should be taking of herself!" You can only guess where her daughter was uploading those pictures to...myspace.
Teen girls looking and acting ****** and like ******, well we need to just protect them and throw any man above the age of 18 in jail for the rest of their lives if they glance at them out of the corner of their eye.
Still, 13 to 18 is a fairly extreme difference.
All this being said, here's my problem with this conviction: the core argument seems to be that he raped her. In that case, why not convict for RAPE? In this case, statutory rape seems to be a cop out, exactly because they cannot prove rape. The argument goes something like "well, we want to get this guy... we have little to no evidence of rape, but statutory rape is a fairly low bar, so let's go that route."
I understand the point of the Statutory Rape laws - protect the children/etc. But the idea is that children don't know enough to make a real decision, and/or feel pressured by adults. But this girl seems to have been holding herself out as an adult (even if not to this guy), and claiming knowledge of sex/sexual matters, etc. I just don't buy the statutory rape claim here. Convict on Rape or nothing.
there is no evidence presented that force, compulsion, coercion, etc was used.
there is evidence on a lack of ability to make an informed consent. the evidence is the date of birth of the victim.
:"Still, 13 to 18 is a fairly extreme difference."
my question is...what difference? o. the ability to be fully informed of the cisnequence of the decision to have the encounter. it is assumed that people under age x cannot have that ability, and that people at age x have that ability uless it is interfered with by mental defect, such as may be produced by intoxication or health.
this is a cnet story for one reason: the game by the defene counsel to introduce doubt into he juror's minds about how the victim presented herself to the defendant, hoping to have sowhere to go on appeal.
:"But this girl seems to have been holding herself out as an adult"
and that's actually an example of lack of information.
lots of people here work under bosses who hold themselves out as competent to make decisions...how often is that true?
At the age of 14/15 she was using fake ID's to get into bars and she did pick up lots of college age guys for sex which she did for several years. Consider how many statutory cases she could've pulled out of the hat in two years since she did this every weekend.
Her mom finally caught her in the act when a guy in his late 20's came by to take her out to a local theme park and he looked older than the age her daughter claimed. She told her mom the guy was 17 but he looked late 20's and he was.
The thing is that just as April this girl might be be able to pull this age manipulation off if she wanted to and if she's claiming to be 18 in one place more than likely she is doing so everywhere.
Maybe society, religion, and civilisation have developed a somewhat skewed perception of 'childhood'. A sort of cognitive dissonance that ignores the biological imperative of puberty -- which apparently is happening younger in recent years.
My late wife told me she hit puberty early and was fully developed by the age of 12. Of course, she was a Scorpio ... :)
People's perception has changed through the ages. Like, 17th century paintings depict children as 'little adults'. As I understand it, the bar-mitzvah traditionally assumes the boy becomes 'a man' at age 13?
I'm sure farm kids in the 19th cetnruy knew alllll about the birds and the bees. And everyone turned a blind eye to youthful experiments as long as there were no unintended consequences.
And now, we tend to prolong 'childhood' and coming of age. Once upon a time in America, 'coming of age' was deemed 21. Adult responsibility.
Now, it's 18. You can vote, you can go to war but you don't have the judgment to drink a beer before 21? How weird is that?
I find it curious the girl waited several days before saying, "Omigawd, I've been raped" but I surmise that the trial judge took that into account. As well, one wonders if this was a jury trial or the bloke copped a plea bargain, thus the sentence.
And the closing correction?! One could read into that, a lot of lying going on, a bloke with diminished responsibility due to alcohol and weed, and irresponsibility of the parents. Or worse.
And what were the parents doing? Presumably getting drunk and stoned themselves. What else can explain allowing these kids (one of whom wasn't even theirs!) to spend the night at the apartment of a man who didn't know them well enough even to know the girl's age? Not to mention: where had those parents been for the last 13 years? My 6-year-old knows better than to hang around a man coming out of the shower!
Throw the rapist and the parents all into one cell for a few years. But first, snip everyone's tubes. These people ought not to breed.
However I'm not so old as to have forgotten what it was like when I was 18. If a 13 year old girl had told me she was 16 and she LOOKED 16 (which, honestly speaking, some do) and I had the opportunity to get some action with her, I wouldn't have been stopping her to check for ID or anything! Besides, half the girls I knew in high school had fake IDs anyway! To think that after such a relationship went sour (as most high-school relationships do at some point in time) the girl could have then come back and had me arrested and thrown in jail because she lied about her age? Kinda scary!
just because a couple of kids fake their myspace details doesn't mean they should be raped by some drunk/stoned adult.
the myspace stance was just a technical argument to try and get the guy off the charges or get his conviction reduced.
any responsible adult can tell by looking at the folks their true age.
a 13 year old doesn't look like an 18 year old, no matter how much make up and short skirts they put on.
i think the myspace evidence wasn't used because it wasn't relivent under the circumstances, text on a screen on a myspace profile cannot replace the reality of real life.
it was obvious these people were underage, and it was obvious he was drunk and stoned, leading to the rape, not that the 13 year old decided to change her myspace profile, which is a perfectly normal thing for a girl of that age to do.
In other words, you're out of line.
- this is lame
- by boopiejones December 3, 2007 8:58 AM PST
- say you meet a girl at a bar and end up having consentual sex with her. turns out the girl is only 17, but got into the bar using a fake ID. that is rape???
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(25 Comments)if someone represents themselves to be older than they really are, there should be no "rape."