Comments on: Police Blotter: Imprisoned sex offenders demand PCs
Sex offenders committed to Minnesota facility say confiscation of their PCs in security crackdown violates their constitutional rights.
Sex offenders committed to Minnesota facility say confiscation of their PCs in security crackdown violates their constitutional rights.
January 2, 2010 6:00 AM PST
January 1, 2010 12:16 PM PST
January 1, 2010 9:20 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
have no rights except those basic rights afforded any human:
adequate food and shelter, and basic healthcare. Our system of
judgment attempts to treat some prisoners better than others as
a function of the severity of crimes committed, but such
treatment falls into a "privilege" category and is discretionary.
PCs are certainly discretionary. And they are the source of all
kinds of communication and data that are harmful to the
recovery of sexual predators if, indeed, it is possible to recover
from such a malady. This is true whether a person is imprisoned
or not.
When last I checked, the basic rights described in the
Constitution and Bill of Rights do not define rights directly
supporting the continued development of prurient interests. Nor
should they be hijacked to do so. Having a computer in a prison
seems like an oxymoron to me ... and complaints that PCs have
been taken away illustrate our social confusion about rights
versus discretionary privileges.
We should be supporting using PCs for rehabilitation. These are people that will be getting out again and it's be nice to think that they will have/maintain a work skill and will be employable.
If the PCs are wiped when the prisoners get them then they could write a novel or study programming or anything they want to. Heck, allowing them to connect to a Prison Intranet that has self-help stuff or reference materials sounds like a good idea.
Forcing someone to rot in their cell doesn't sound like the best course of action for the society you will release them back into. Letting someone have a tool to improve their lives when they need something positive to look forward to sounds like a good idea.
The constitutional right for a Sex Offender to store Playboy images? Not such a good idea...
These are not incarcerated individuals. These are civil commitments after incarceration. It is our countries way of a life sentence for crimes that cannot command a life sentence.
The issue of prurient pics is bs.... It is a matter of tightening the noose a little tighter.
If so, then they have no actual right to be allowed to use a PC.
If they were commited involuntarily after there sentence terminated, by states that commit them as a way of illegally extending their sentence, then, then they not only have the right to their PC's they have a right to leave.
The trouble is that lawmakers, have started tacking on civil commitments because they are convinced that the offenders will reoffend.
If you want them locked up for life then change the laws to allow it, otherwise when a sentence is done, a sentence is done.
Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
You are innocent until proven guilty, but once proven guilty and sentenced a prison term, your rights are to complete your sentenced time.
Anybody can demand anything... getting it however is another thing.
Especially for sex offenders. They've deprived at least one child from living a normal life. That child will have to live with the awful memories those offenders inflicted upon them for the rest of their lives.
Prison is not a happy go-easy life of leasure! For sex offenders it should not be pleasurable. Giving in to such demands will make their time a lot easier. But their victims don't get off as lightly.
So if they want a PC, go out and find an old 8086 or 80286 CPU with 1-4MB Ram in it. Remove the power supply and set it in their cell! (* GRIN *)
They now have a PC as they demanded! (* CHUCKLE *)
FWIW
However, because of what they did and what they are in the slammer for they have no right to privacy on those computers and like themselves and their cells should have their computers searched and checked weekly or monthly by authorities. They should have no say in what software or settings are used and if they are found to have been visiting sites and looking at materials that are inappropriate because of their crime then a extra year should be added to their sentence for each violation.
Robert
Whether you like the idea of a prisoner being denied a privilege like access to a computer is irrelevant to the prisoner's rights.
These ARE prisoners. They are incarcerated for crimes they have committed. Incarceration should NOT include the 'comforts' of "home". Access to computers does not mean that prisoners need to have them in their cells. I am against cruel and inhumane treatment however, if serving prison time becomes more comfortable than the lives of many in the "inner-city slums" (for example) then it would appear that going to prison is a step up.
Prison and/or incarceration should be a deterrent against committing a crime in the first place. The more comfortable and the more "Rights" that are given to these convicted criminals, the less the prison system is a deterrent in of itself.
The more you "soften" the prison stay, the less it becomes a punishment and the more it becomes an acceptable way of life.
As soon as a criminal violates someone else's rights, they forfeit their own. Not only their right to travel freely, but their rights beyond the "Necessities of life"...Food, housing, clothing.
Perhaps that is why crime rates grow each year...lack of punishment as a deterrent.
prison, you've been drinking the koolade. I used to work in a
prison, and it is not cushy in anyway, shape or form.
The food is devoid of nourishment, steel sheets for beds with
two inch thick mattresses, violence, overcrowding (2-3 guys in a
cell designed for one).
Some prison work shops have computers, but of course they're
not online.
I don't know what this so called prison was you walked through,
but it wasn't your average prison.
I hope the system and officers aren't going to bite into this right's stuff, where was the Innocent Victim's Rights while they were abused? ... Udo freenclear1@msn.com
That is why the offenders have been deprived of their liberty and are in jail. They are being punished for offending against the victim's rights.
Still, even in prison, certain rights accrue to all people. For example the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution States: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
This obviously applies to convicts and punishing innocent people makes no sense.
"The confiscation is part of a broader, planned crackdown on
personal computers owned by TCU patients, with administrators
arguing that the machines are used to store sexual images and
ones in common areas should be used instead."
They *DO* have access to computers. They have been denied a
private computer in their cells. I don't see a problem here at all,
except for the fact that they were allowed private computers to
begin with. These are convicted sex offenders after all (rapists,
child molesters and the like), as noted by others the only rights
they now have are the rights to basic living needs. I don't see
how a private computer fits into that.
If they want to explore a tech field (programming, for instance),
they can do so on the provided "common area" machines. If
that's a problem for them - tough. If you can't do the time, don't
do the crime.
in the Stanford experiment with prisoners and guards.
How do we get more good behavior? I think is an important
question to be answered. With a such a high return rate its easy
to say what is being done in the Corrections Department needs
to be examined. Finding a solution is more difficult.
We can train wild animals with rewards, can we train humans as
well?
If hope is a key to success how is returning a person to society
with the same skill set or less compared to current society needs
a way for society to expect a more successful person has
returned?
How do we train people to use computer oriented skills without
the use of a computer? Tough situation.
Is a computer access a right? Depends on your view point, in
my opinion. If we took people out of society for society
behavior correction then we need to teach better behavior
appropriated for how we expect them to act when returned to
society. If not do something else and expect something else.
Jim
I am on the left side of center but no revolutionary. But you twist peoples meanings and hurl around the term liberal as an deadly epithet.
When you learn to separate your emotions from your reason, come back and join the debate as an adult. Because whatever your pyhsical age, your emotional ages seems to be stuck around seven years old.
It's scary to think that people like you might be found voting for
our country's leaders. That's why 911 happened. That's why
innocent people are being tortured without cause. That's why
corruption is rampant throughout our govenment right now.
That's why our constitutional rights are being urinated upon on
a regular basis. That's why we're mired in an illegal war with no
end in sight and not even a plan to move forward toward peace.
Conservatism (read: nazi-ism) is a mental disorder.
Now that we've got the name calling out of the way, explain to
me how it applies to this article again?
Maybe I should point out that I don't disagree with your
apparent stand on this topic, prison IS a punishment and these
pathetic child rapists have lost their rights and rightfully so. It's
just your obviously blind, hateful political jabs that have no
purpose here that I'm disagreeing with. Throw your pro-nazi
comments around in the article about Gonzo wishing to make
thought crime a life sentence (http://news.com.com/
8301-10784_3-9719339-7.html?
part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5), it would be more
appropriate there.
not all, in fact the minority of sex offenders, committed their crime
against minors?
Here: http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLG_en___US205&q=Sexual+Offender+Hysteria
I gave you a START!!! ;)
If the offender is on a lesser sentence not convicted of rape or some other serious offence and they are in a treatment center and they want to use the PC's or Mac's for educational purposes to better themselves sure if the right tools to monitor such activity's are in place.
Again... I am not defending their rights if your in the system you have to abide by that systems rules.
But i'm sure if it was you, one would change their mind really quick, or how about we take away your right to drive forever and impound your car because you get behind the wheel after drinking, even after only 1 glass of beer or wine or one shot. Same thing...
The individuals were not arguing they had a right to PCs, they were arguing their personal property was taken without Due Process, and they anticipated having said property destroyed. These facilities are run much like prisons, which means if non-contraband personal property is seized, the state must provide a reason for said seizure, and allow for grievances to be filed.
That said, an escape triggers a lockdown, invasive searches and seizures, and a showing of force. Whether the facility used this as a means to confiscate PCs, or there was lack of communication as to the disposition of the seized PCs, it's hard to say. Getting to the truth of the matter in a state controlled environment is difficult. Getting society to look objectively at "sex offender" issues is even more difficult.
there is a perceived problem or a real problem, internet-connected
PCs are a portal to much more than getting a fix on freely available
images.
There may have been a mistake in how personal property was
handled. That should be righted if wrong were in fact committed.
BUT ... objectively looking at a harmful habit is dangerous. Hence
the difficulty vis-a-vis objectivity.
- Criminally Insane
- by ohpoppycock June 11, 2007 9:08 AM PDT
- You can be both. Its rare but a fact nontheless.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(39 Comments)