Comments on: Counting the cost of counterfeiting
Microsoft antipiracy exec says the company would rather educate than punish users of pirated software.
Microsoft antipiracy exec says the company would rather educate than punish users of pirated software.
November 29, 2009 9:02 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:54 PM PST
November 29, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
With that said, MS is doing all kinds of stuff to stop piracy, but they don't seem to be bothered by "double taxing"?
By this I mean many people don't like the crapafied OEM installs that come with a typical HP or Dell PC and the "restore disk" that comes with them, so they buy "clean" retail or OEM versions of the OS. Even though they have an OEM license, they must still pay for a full retail version of the OS for $300.
Second, If I have a full version of Windows XP pro SP2 and I buy a new machine to replace the one I am using, I can't take the copy of Windows with me because it is tied to the hardware.
I should be able to unregistered it from one PC so that I may move it to the next PC.
Since almost all corporations buy PC's with at least XP home on them anyway, MS should be charging a fraction of what they charge today for corporate licenses.
There is a refund program, but I know of few people who have actually used it.
I also don't believe you can use a XP RTM license with a XP SP2 install disk, but you should be able to.
Since MS loses little sleep over all the unnecessary licenses people end up buying, why should I lose any sleep over piracy?
Also, if MS were to stop 100% of piracy today, people would have an actual reason to embrace an alternative desktop.
Uptake of Linux on the desktop actually seems slower in poor counries than it does in the US doe to heavy piracy in those nations.
This would apeal to people like me who admin 3 or 4 family PC's and get sick of constantly making house calls to remove infections and spyware.
Many people like me get frustrated and _this_ is where Linux is making inroads on the desktop. Sometimes moving them to Linux is easier than making constant house calls becasue the PC is spitting porn popups and ads as soon as it boots or is running at a snails speed.
With a simple disk imaging solution I could just do a clean install, install the things they need, and clone it. If they ever run into problems they can back up their digital photos and re-image the drive on their own without needing hours of my time.
A security blanket like this may also allow users to be able to embrace technology rather than fear it.
PS. Be lucky I don't have the money to fund all the ideas I think of for other people :)
I saw apple's site listing their OS (of course, it only runs on a mac...) at a reasonable price, and then a 5 pc license for $200. I think this would be an excellent approach for Microsoft to take, as it would likely eliminate the "casual" piracy. Make it easy for families to use it on their home computers, and easy for the people who tinker around to be legit.
I'm all for stopping the counterfeit operations and education, but they also need to show a real incentive beyond a "genuine advantage" program like they're doing. That incentive should be a fair pricing on a small 3-5 pc license like Apple is doing.
With all the versions of Vista coming out, WHY couldn't they make this an option for, say the "ultimate" versions???
Why alienate customers instead of profiting more from them?
I have 3 computers in my home (2 mine, one GF) plus I take responsibility for my dads machine.
We don't eat on dirt floors, but there is no way I am going to spend $1200 for extra versions of Windows when 3 of the machines were under $400 new.
Compare to Apple who sells 5 user licenses for $199.00.
Poeple like free stuff. Would you try the free samples in the supermarket if you would have to pay for them?
People get pirated copies because they can get it for free. If they couldn't get it for free, they would start looking for smoething else that is free. Linux, Open Office...
Actually m$ and other greedy companies that fear sofware piracy should think at it as a free way for them to get more users. Users of the pirated versions get to know the software, too and at some point - where they can no more risk using illegal software - they will pay for it. Without the so called piracy they would stick to Linux 'till they die.
So I whish that m$ will be 100% successful with its anti-piracy program. In my oppinion that success will not pay them all those millions of dollars, but it will guide millions to the wonderful world of free software. Free as in free beer.
- A good resource to educate;-)
- by jwmoreland May 22, 2006 10:29 AM PDT
- http://youtube.com/watch?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- reffer madness
- by gggg sssss May 22, 2006 3:27 PM PDT
- Hey reefer madness is there somewhere as well.
- Like this
-
(12 Comments)v=hpv6_6pCpY8&search=don%27t%20copy%20that%20floppy