Comments on: Senate moves toward new data security rules

Three congressional committees meet to work on new security breach laws, though their proposals aren't quite ready for final vote.

Senate moves toward new data security rules

Senate moves toward new data security rules

Mr. AT Alishtari, POA and Founder EDI Secure LLLP, says the U.S. Senate Cybercrime treaty as suggested for ratification by the European Union is the best thing for establishing a global standard for public and private ID theft protection.

The powers that be in the G8 already recognize that getting authentication standards is in the interest of consumers even though many IT giants squawk saying two factor authentication is not enough or two factor authentication is hacked. This is like saying our ball is flat too when it is not. They forget to say US Commerce Dept level 3 two factor authentication is breached not level 4 two factor authentication with an offline swipe device.

This is where the government steps in and defines the top level 4 of industry authentication as two factor authentication with an offline device is not hackable and the shame is the IT giants know this but, well, they don't own it. It is good the U.S. Dept of Commerce National Institute for Standards and Technology, NIST, also knows it. The USPTO granted the single use credit card number ID patent given to EDI Secure on July 22, 2003, as a legal monopoly over the next 15 years. That patent is defined by the US, as the standard for public and private ID protection.

Sometimes a new MSN or IBM is created from just position. Apple is big after IBM missed PCs but it caught up. EDI Secure LLLP will be big since it owns the level 4 authentication the world says it needs to stop bank rape today. Call it dumb luck or an act of God. Either way this is a fact and U.S. consumers will beat a path to EDI Secure LLLP once they know, hey, I can be safe again.

Senate moves toward new data security rules

Senate moves toward new data security rules

Mr. AT Alishtari, POA and Founder EDI Secure LLLP, says the U.S. Senate Cybercrime treaty as suggested for ratification by the European Union is the best thing for establishing a global standard for public and private ID theft protection.

The powers that be in the G8 already recognize that getting authentication standards is in the interest of consumers even though many IT giants squawk saying two factor authentication is not enough or two factor authentication is hacked. This is like saying our ball is flat too when it is not. They forget to say US Commerce Dept level 3 two factor authentication is breached not level 4 two factor authentication with an offline swipe device.

This is where the government steps in and defines the top level 4 of industry authentication as two factor authentication with an offline device is not hackable and the shame is the IT giants know this but, well, they don't own it. It is good the U.S. Dept of Commerce National Institute for Standards and Technology, NIST, also knows it. The USPTO granted the single use credit card number ID patent given to EDI Secure on July 22, 2003, as a legal monopoly over the next 15 years. That patent is defined by the US, as the standard for public and private ID protection.

Sometimes a new MSN or IBM is created from just position. Apple is big after IBM missed PCs but it caught up. EDI Secure LLLP will be big since it owns the level 4 authentication the world says it needs to stop bank rape today. Call it dumb luck or an act of God. Either way this is a fact and U.S. consumers will beat a path to EDI Secure LLLP once they know, hey, I can be safe again.

[wtortorici]

SOS

Banks and other finacial instutions are going to water down any attempt to punish them for losing our personal data. They, both houses have to impose stiff and i mean stiff penalties before they really protect the data banks. If they had to pay a buck for every persons data they lost by what ever means, you can bet they would install real safe guards.

[Iohagh]

On your SOS about ID theft in banks and law makers

I cannot agree with you more however this means we voters have to tell our legislators like they did in UK that we want stiff fines and implementation of not only 4 factor authentication that produces single use credit card numbers but the numbers themselves. That is what I think. Ciao now.

[wtortorici]

SOS

Banks and other finacial instutions are going to water down any attempt to punish them for losing our personal data. They, both houses have to impose stiff and i mean stiff penalties before they really protect the data banks. If they had to pay a buck for every persons data they lost by what ever means, you can bet they would install real safe guards.

[Iohagh]

On your SOS about ID theft in banks and law makers

I cannot agree with you more however this means we voters have to tell our legislators like they did in UK that we want stiff fines and implementation of not only 4 factor authentication that produces single use credit card numbers but the numbers themselves. That is what I think. Ciao now.