Comments on: Photo: Scanner searches through clothing
Department of Homeland Security is looking to employ scanning systems that do a complete search to detect weapons.
Department of Homeland Security is looking to employ scanning systems that do a complete search to detect weapons.
January 4, 2010 8:25 PM PST
January 4, 2010 7:20 PM PST
January 4, 2010 7:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
I got a weapon of mass destruction for ya right here TSA!
off with only Taking off our shoes and belts, well get ready for this, because it's here!
They Won't ask you How's it hanging? They'll SEE!
Visually , if it's hanging, or hiding,Gee's who
Would have believed in our life time's
We'd have to be willing to walk naked trough Airport security for all practical purposes, butt naked... just for massed transit
The Fear American's share over, the possibility of breaching of our FREEDOM.........?
At this point ,Were willing to let it all hang out,for every one to see , in public , no less!
have you read The US Constitution? or Bill of rights lately That our country was founded on?
http://www.explorefreedomusa.org/
! Who knows? Well maybe, The new Virtual STRIP SEARCH at the Airports Might move up human conscious
Blessing in Disguise, American's in General are ""WAY"" to hung up ordinary,nakedness
and Normal healthy human body functions, hens, Viagra???????? for sport and entertainment
functions, Like a dude with a Boner, will hold a magazine in front of his crotch, or hand's in his pockets, or UN -Tuck his shirt, to try and hide his erection, as if it were bad or something to be ashamed of, or something,
And reality is quite the opposite , it's completely natural,
But most of us including adults,
don't act like it!'
Adult males for the most part Act as if they have done something inadvertently wrong, We can Thank,The history of Catholicism, for That.
All The boy's
going through puberty & airport security with those relentless pup tents in there pants
That we've experenced, Are either going to be
real embarrased, or
Or finally embrace our Male-Ness
with Pride. Synopsis:There will always be change And Boners, but now, What so many of use guy's worried about, will be perfectly ""Virtually"
C l e a r. )=====) NO different than a
()()
strip search!
next they'll be selling pocket
see through clothes gizmos built right into eye or sunglasses......
Same holds certainly for other religions and cultures.
This will do much more harm than good...
And it won't help: how many terrorists have been cought by metal detectors? More: how many haven't? Why should that be ANY different with ANY other technique? Terrorism cannot really defied technically - its a social, cultural and political problem.
Andre
I travel on a weekly basis and I know first hand the hassle at airports, but if this stops one plane from going down, I say go for it. I don't have anything to hide.
You are correct in saying terrorism is a social, political and cultural problem, but it can be solved with a few well placed bombs....two bombs ended a world war.
Have a great time in the Great White North,
James
I bet if you showed up at the airport naked, you wouldn't even make it to the gate before being arrested. But if someone is getting paid to see you naked it's ok.....wait, isn't that sort of like prostitution? I know that may sound extreme, but think about it.
I will gladly take the 1 in 500 million chance of something bad happening on a plane then to hand over my freedom. Maybe it's time to move to a free country like Canada.
I don't believe the X-ray scans aren't are huge problem, but they are endemic of a trend putting "security from a vague and abstract threat" ahead of personal freedom. If you recall 8th grade literature, this was the entire premise of Orwell's 1984. If we are not mindful of the balance between freedom and security, then we are doomed to a future without either.
have a nice trip.
PS I like Canada and the Canadian people. They spend lots of money in my state of Florida. I have visited Canada and found it to be quite charming as well. So this is not a knock against the Canadian people - just their socialist tendencies.
What? So they had to travel from Europe on un-airconditioned ships with common sleeping quarters for the lower-class and chamber pots for toilets. So? I still have the right to travel however I want and everybody else has to make me happy!
of OSI Systems. "Since the Russian plane tragedy, which is
suspected due to suicide bombers, the interest has heightened
for these needs, especially for the body scanner," Deepak
Chopra, the chief executive of OSI Systems, recently told
analysts.
Deepak Chopra??? Man, he's getting desperate.
how ironic.
What are you folks going to do when pictures of five to nine year old girls and boys begin appearing on the Internet from systems like these? Should we exclude those children from this system? Then they'll start pushing the bombs into these kids bodies.
Oh wait, this system doesn't catch anything ingested. So what do we do with the guys who swallow various items in a condom and them regurgitate those items in the bathroom?
Perhaps those items could also be stored in the anal cavity and blocked with a plug of some sort until the terrorist is ready for their release?
Is your answer for everyone - including small children - to undergo cavity searches, pass through a metal detector, pose nude in front of security guards, and to be forced to regurgitate the contents of their stomach? That's what they do when you're being admitted to prison, I'll admit, but all that .. for a plane ride?
You suggest that we use female guards for women, male guards for men. Funny. This doesn't take into account the sexuality of the people - it stereotypes them. So a lesbian female peering at another female is okay, but a male isn't?
You all willingly give up your civil liberties for a moment's peace of mind; a moment that isn't even a true peace of mind. Of the terrorist attacks that have occurred how many have had accomplices? How many items have been smuggled onboard by the pilots, stewardesses, repair mechanics, etc., that don't have to undergo such intensive scrutinies?
Should we force them to undergo those same scrutinies? That'll be one more fact they have in their favor when they ask for a raise and the airlines come begging to the United States government for another handout comprised of my tax dollars while their executives rake in millions.
The individuals responsible for September 11 could just as easily have taken bombs and munitions up to the top of the towers and inflicted the same type of damage. Should we remove all explosives and possible explosives from the shelves and public access?
Perhaps we should screen all those who enter a public or open to the public building as we do when they jump on an airplane?
The funny thing is that the comments about Muslim men are right on target. Instead of the government recognizing that these men are the ones to look out for we've outlawed "stereotyping" -- it's not "politically correct" to look at past facts and draw conclusions anymore. A black man in an all white city and a crime was just committed? He's driving a car that was seen in the area? We pull him over, the government gets sued -- wha? I'm sorry, look at the past facts - if Muslims are responsible for 99% of the terrorist attacks in the world then place THEM under more scrutiny.
Disclaimer: I don't fly anymore after five years of flying twice a day because after September 11 *I* was searched (strip searched in many cases), harassed, and otherwise delayed. I had my medicine confiscated three times (insulin) because I carried only the bottles, not the boxes they were given to me in (with the prescriptions on the outside). $600.00 in medicine taken because "it could be a dangerous agent." Uh, yea.
The airlines can flounder and die. And those of you who're willing to give up your civil liberties for reasons like this need to examine history, specifically, Germany prior to World War II.
I love how everyone points out that this administration is soooo much like Nazi Germany. It's funny...because in Nazi Germany they burned bibles and persecuted jews. This administration is backing Isreal and is preaching the bible.
Anyway...I'd love to see a terrorist pack a knife or a gun in a condom and swallow it...that'd be the dumbest thing in the world.
I don't fly on airplanes, so I dont go to the airport...but I'm still against these kinds of machines.
Rather than make us safer, these xray machines (call them millimeter scanners if you will) long term will most probably just be linked to hundreds of cases of illnesses by airport personnel and long term cost the US Government billions in liability and not save us from a single terrorist act. I'm not against new technology and I could not care less who gets to see my privates, but I do care about false security promises.
Does anybody recognize this America anymore? What is the "war on terror" anyway. More like a war on all our civil liberties.
You people love to call America all these terrible things and rant
and rave but you have no problem living here and reaping the
benefits. Go to France.
So how exactly is freedom of speech being curbed?
Maybe you'll feel more at home.
The doctor wanted to x-ray me! He also wanted me to take of my clothes! He even wanted to take his finger and .... well I won't even say. Anyway...
I can't believe they allow such evil fascist degenerates to become physicians and take away my liberties! They're even worse than the evil fascist pedophiles that will be staffing all these airport x-ray machines.
One more thing ... ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SARCASM. It's sad I feel the need to point that out, but unfortunately half the posts in this thread are even more absurd.
People will vote on this, and in the true nature of a democracy (which we aren't) and a free market system, everyone affected will get to vote. Those who are willing will still fly. The rest of you can find another way to get there. If enough want it, the airlines will offer security-free flights (aka, private charter aviation). So what's your beef? It's just another excuse to whine about the unfairness (according to you) of life!
Our founding father were not all-knowing beings. They were people just like you and I. In fact, most of us have more education than they did. These were people that lived a long time ago.
Try to keep that in mind when you want to bring up the founding fathers.
Barney Fife than to get felt up and frisked. I think this is a better
alternative.
If I start seeing "Airport Screener Porn" shots posted, I'd be more
worried about the fetish than the source.
If someone posts for this job, it is my belief that they are automatically unqulified, and more than a bit strange.
Would you have any interest in this job? I am afraid that I would be a poor screener as I wore eyeglasses that blurred my vision.
Fly safe and leave the PA's at home,
James
And, the loss of such personal rights, and freedoms, is far worse than the ridiculously small chance of being the "victim of a terrorist attack".
1. It is offensive to be viewed naked.
2. Being viewed naked is an affront to personal freedom.
3. This is a slippery slope and once allowed here it will be allowed everywhere until there are virtually no personal freedoms left.
The opinions for the technology seem to boil down to is this:
1. Who cares if one is viewed naked?
2. It is better to be seen naked and alive than be dead.
3. This will make the airplanes safer.
4. This is a less obtrusive way to search passengers.
I have to agree - for the most part - with the latter. Here is why:
1. In the demonstration I saw, the screeners could not see the people - all they could see were the images. Therefore, they never saw a person walk up, through and then leave. The point is that if their own mother walked through, they would have no idea since you can't tell who it is.
2. Nobody else can see your image other than the security operator. That includes other passengers and employees of the airports.
3. This is much less obtrusive than removing shoes, clothing and emptying out all of your pockets - in front of everyone.
4. The fundamental liberty is the right to life. One's right to live trumps others rights.
5. It is not only the liberty of the passengers and crew that must be considered here. It is their lives as-well-as the lives of all the people on the ground as that airplane flies over. Additionally, it is the nation's and even the world's economy and peace that must be considered. Remember what 9/11 did to the economy and the peace in the world?
6. Air travel is not a required means of travel. You can use other public transportation. You can travel by car or even by boat. Air travel is a convenience - and a choice. When you buy your ticket, you agree to be bound by their rules and policies.
7. For the person who quoted Benjamin Franklin - get your quote correct. It is "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." IMHO, this technology does not cause you to give up any ESSENTIAL liberty and there is nothing TEMPORARY about DEATH!
Of course, everyone has their own opinion on that. Some may think that it's better to simply live, period, regardless of how their God given rights are taken away. But isn't the inalienability of our rights part of what separates us from the animals, plants, and mere rocks?
You say that privacy is not an essential right. According to whom? People can survive biologically without their privacy. Just like they can survive biologically without the feedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly. But many of us don't call that living, and are not willing to sacrifice a human right for a little increased sense of physical security. We are after all living in America, not Nazis Germany, Communist Russia, or under some third world dictatorship. In our country, human rights and human dignity are supposed to matter.
But if you want to be a naked sheep, be my guest. Sumbit to these new airport scanning devices, and bleet a grateful thanks as you fly the friendly skies. Don't be suprised though when the terrorists find away around the security scanners. And don't be suprised what other rights and liberties you see disappear too, in the next few years. But, what will you care, so long as someone promises you that "at least you'll be there" to see them disappear?
I for one would rather risk the hazards of flying, and if need be I will drive 100,000 miles before I sacrifice my physical privacy, or any other of my rights, for a false sense of security.
muslims are conspiring to destroy america. I can't believe this is
coming out of "educated" people. how can you even represent
your country, your people, in this way, shame on you!
-There are some people out there that don't mind parading
naked infront of people, but there are those who prefer to keep
their bodies private. that should be respected.
-Terrorist threats are rare for the average person. I'm sitting in
my room and oh my god i'm gonna have a plane fly through my
window any minute. my electrical outlet is a terrorist threat, it's
threatening the earth as of this moment.
-I bet those people commenting on countries like china and
canada have never been there (except for one), get off your fat
***** and go see them and then you can talk.
-as for these images going on the net, yes they will get there
without doubt, not only that but they will be stored in a
database for future reference.
At 21 I shouldn't be lecturing people about their behaviour.
All you Americans talk about moving to another country if they dont like it! I am from Japan!
If you Americans willing to have these security technologies in airports, you are trading away personal privacy! I am sure most of you commenting about WHO CARES dont see the plenty comments above them stating they DO CARE.
For people commenting on how USA = NAZI GERMANY they are RIGHT. NOT ONLY is USA keeping MUSLIMS "terrorists" (instead of Jews!) in Guantanemo Bay (JUST LIKE CONCENTRATION CAMPS) they are preaching their religions as the only correct religion!
YOU WILL SEE, if Americans are not as STUPID as people of the world think, they will not allow this! Once this is allowed, TERRORISTS HAVE WON!
"Temporary security" as Ben Franklin in this case is TEMPORARY! This is so people can feel safe for a few years while the POINTLESS war in Iraq is going on. Notice how I say POINTLESS, because W Bush changed the war from WMD to REGIME CHANGE! You do not go to war with another country for REGIME CHANGE! Democracy is a privledge, NOT A REQUIREMENT.
The ultimate resolution is to hunt down everyone who advocates killing Americans and kill them and their teachers and their families first. Eventually they will get the idea and then we can all fly again, worried only about maintenance and pilotage goofs.
your other comment it's borderline Ma an Pa get your gun out
tactics. Ok fine why don't you go fight them yourself instead of
sending young people off to die so you can sit on your computer
typing the divel your thinking of. Seriously what the **** is going
on this world with people like you even existing?
It is the arrogance of those same isolationists that pissed off the terrorists to begin with. (Which, before you read that incorrectly, as you no doubt will, is not justification. Nor is it saying "We deserved it." Simply a discussion of the reason why it happened. But it's so much easier just to say they hate us and they'll do it anyway, isn't it? So much easier because then we don't have to change anything about the way we behave in the world!)
Before you tell me to move to some other country if I don't like it, take the briefest of moments to think about the screeds you're typing. You don't get to decide for everyone. America, remember? The Constitution establishes democracy, which means no one is any better or any worse (after the 19th Amendment) than anyone else. You're merely the Caucasian mirror-image of a Muslim extremist yourself. "Everyone else should give up their freedoms because I don't care about mine! Anyone who disagrees with me can move!" Well, Sherlock, that's not how it works. We all have to agree. And we if don't agree, you can't just rewrite the rules so your mindless conservative paranoia and rubber-stamped Republicanism triumph anyhow.
Let me guess. Back in the 1850s you were the kind of person that argued African-Americans were biologically incapable of learning to read, because the vast majority of African-Americans (slaves, remember?) couldn't read. Nevermind they weren't allowed to learn to read. It was a justification for marginalizing an ethnicity. Like the anti-Semitic ravings of Nazi Germany, or the anti-Muslim ravings of 1300s Europe, which we've apparently resurrected today, because after all, good hatred never dies, does it?
Hell, you can't evrn go to thr Theater without going through a Metal Detector and having your Coat and Pockets checked. Try going to a Concert or a Ballgame without Security checks. Try Driving accross the Hoover Dam without having your car searched. Trucks are not allowed at all. Before anyone argues I should serve in the military, well I have and have had to carry out the Brave Fellow Soldiers and a few Women in body bags in another war that was not very popular. We were certainly not defending our freedom in Korea or Vietnam, not even in Iran. Our Brave men and wommen were orderd to go and they went and many never returned. These Brave men are spinning in their graves, because we would rather have sacrificed their lives than fight for our freedoms here at home. A fight that will not cost our lives on a battlefield.
A famous patriot once said " Give me Liberty, or give me Death." The same goes for me. Thank God I will not live long enough to see George Orwell's 1984,25 or 30 years later.
The biggest problem with your line of thinking is in what you said in this comment-
"It is the arrogance of those same isolationists that pissed off the terrorists to begin with. (Which, before you read that incorrectly, as you no doubt will, is not justification. Nor is it saying "We deserved it." Simply a discussion of the reason why it happened. But it's so much easier just to say they hate us and they'll do it anyway, isn't it? So much easier because then we don't have to change anything about the way we behave in the world!"
Isolationism is not the reason that terrorists are pissed off at us, or anyone else for that matter. Radical Muslims (not all Muslims) do hate us and will stop at nothing until our way of life is destroyed. In the fatwa's of Osama Bin Laden, among others, they flat out tell us that it is commanded of them that we must die because we do not believe the way that they do. That is their justification for what they do. You cannot reason with people like that, because they will refuse to listen to you (us) because you (we) are an infidel. Therefore, there is no need to change the way that we behave in the world becasue it will not matter unless we change to meet they demand. You are trying to apply reason to people who have none.
Of course, kicking all Muslims out of the country is a stupid statement. However, it is of the utmost importance that we understand AND come to terms with the intentions of radical Muslims, not stick our heads in the sand and say that we need to open a line of communication with them and try to reach an understanding with them so we can all get along. Unfortunatly, it will never happen.
Also, don't ever use political name calling (i.e. "And we if don't agree, you can't just rewrite the rules so your mindless conservative paranoia and rubber-stamped Republicanism triumph anyhow.") to try to make your point. Once you do that, it shuts the minds of those that you are having the discussion with, as well as your own. This discussion has nothing to do with conservative vs. liberal/Republican vs. Democrat. It is a discussion about identifing a problem, understanding and accepting the mindsets of those involved, and making tough descions about how to fix the problem. Once that is done, you can then go back and try to figure out why the problem occured and try to find ways to prevent it in the future.
Reading your post, it's obvious you were a big fan of history in school, with all the references back to September 11, but it's obvious grammar and spelling weren't high on your list. There are many to choose from, including the wrong word ("Their is bad in all countries." - NO. THERE is bad. Their, there and they're are three different words that sound the same, are spelled differently and mean different things. Please study them before posting again).
As for spelling, there are too many to mention, but I'll pick out one sentence "I agree with checking and having air marshells on board but don't infrig on my privaty and I should be able to fly and still have my privaty in tack."
***?
marshals ... infringe ... privacy ... intact ...
Please go back to the public school you attended in Oklahoma and as for a refund of the money your parents paid for your education.
Get over your body, and get over yourself. Your hang-ups are not worth compromising my safety. You really have that many hang-ups about your body, maybe you shouldn't fly.
Steve
- All this talk of freedom??
- by May 28, 2005 8:41 AM PDT
- What is freedom? And how are we losing freedom with these scanners? How? Visit a nudist colony to see what true freedom is. You were born without clothes. Were you not? We only started wearing clothes after many thousands of years of evolution. Before then, we were like all other animals, we walked around naked. Granted we had more fur (hair) to stay warm. After losing all that hair, we were cold, therefore we started making clothes. Then all of a sudden, we become so modest. Yeah right! It's all in your heads. Get over your false modesty and all your hang-ups. Our security is much more important than that. And clothing has nothing to do with freedom. As far as I am concerned, everyone should fly naked if it will make us safer.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (134 Comments)