Comments on: Mandriva latest to reject Microsoft

Company follows other Linux distributors in publicly spurning Microsoft's interest in a patent protection agreement.

[MaLvaDo39]

Put up or shut up, Microsoft

They won't show what patents are so-called infringed, and are
striking a FUD campaign to force open source partnership.

What a piece of sh** company.

Drop Microsoft technologies, don't support a predatory company
that limits choice.

[t8]

My thoughts exactly

I have MS Word but don't have it on my PC. It is a piece of crap just like the company that made it.

I use Open Office and Google Docs and Spreadsheets.
So my MS Word CD can be a coffee coaster for all I care.

I don't need that **** company.

[zeeboid]

yea, like...

by your logic, you shouldn't buy an automobile also. its amazing that for some reason when it comes to software, all the rules of running a company seam to be evil. at least Microsoft doesn't force you to purchase the hardware they make also (apple anyone?)

[herkamur]

forced purchase

Oh, get real. Apple isn't forcing you to do anything. If you don't like what they're offering, then don't buy it.

[Phillep_H]

Bad anology

It's more like Ford trying to force all the other auto makers to pay protection money on every car they make, based on unspecified patents.

[t8]

Spoken like a true ignoramus

Microsoft are one of the worse companies in the world for breaking the law and for stealing other people's stuff.

They are a bunch of thieves and they give nothing back to anyone.

So why stick up for them, unless of course you own their stock or work for them.

Apart from that, it is in the public's interest to dump Microsoft if they can. Open is better and we live in the Internet Age now. It isn't the 90s anymore. Boxed bloatware costing hundreds of dollars is now the past.

You will never get me buying software in a box ever again. Why would you when you can do most things with a browser, broadband, and Web 2.0.

[ittesi259]

Um, I'm not seeing your point

If a automobile manufacturer came to me and said "The car you make infringes 235 of our patents but if you sign this agreement we promise not sue you or the people who bought your car" my response would be the same as Red Hat, Canonical and Mandriva....until you show me exactly what I'm infringing to prove I actually am, I aint changing nothing (because we both know if I started doing it first your so call patent is null and void).

[Dr_Zinj]

Seems like Protection Money

Yeah, that's exactly what it is. Corporate Extortion by Microsoft to not break their knees, err, cost them money and time in a bogus trial.

[qwerty75]

Be happy they are doing this

They funded SCO and failed. So they know better to go to court.

They funded lots of FUD studies and that failed.

They tried to copy Linux with Vista and that failed.

This is all they have left to "compete" with Linux.

[qwerty75]

Distrowatch

Is meaningless numbers.

When legitimate news organization quote distrowatch, they at least say it doesn't track downloads or actual number of installations.

It is gratifying to see that most of the people behind the distros see this for what it is: a alst ditch, desperate effort to slow down Linux.

No one cares about Linspire or Xandros, but when Novell foolishly signed that nonsense, they harmed themselves.

Which is a shame, because SuSE is one of the best operating systems on the planet. For desktop use, only OSX can compete with it.

[Sumatra-Bosch]

Good for Mandriva - Best Strategy

MS is probably going to assert against the non-surrendering distros and probably use some clause in the deals they have now with Novell and the legion of surrendered distros that they will try to use to compel them to join the suit or likely suite. The assertion suits have already been drafted by MS counsel in the development of the Linux-elimination strategy.

MS' plan is to divide the OS distros into two camps, sue the non-compliant crowd like Mandriva and turning Novell and Co into community pariahs.

That will throw Linux development into chaos and give Windows another 10 years as the cases wend their way through courts all over the world. While the case is proceeding, meanwhile, MS will be delivering infringement notices to every OS developer on the planet who goes near Linux.

Nice.

[ethana2]

Wow. He NAILED that sucker!

"Interoperability between the Windows and Linux world is important and must be dealt with, and anything that helps this interoperability is a good thing," wrote Bancilhon, adding that

_"the best way to deal with interoperability is open standards."_ ---RIGHT THERE, BABY.
Hear, hear!!!

Good job with silverlight's open spec, Microsoft. First thing you've done right in a while.
(It'll be funny when the OSS implementation will be better than M$'s own ;)

[WJeansonne]

Yeah, Not a Fan of the U.S. Patent System

That explains it in a nutshell. Because deep down he knows that open source most likely violates patents that others thought of first, so he wants to change the rules midcourse. Nice try, but I don't buy the open source mantra of our patent system as being broken. It's suited the country well for over 200 years and has not hampered innovation one bit!

[qwerty75]

lol

If MS had a valid claim they would be doing it in the courts, not through paid idiots like you.

Secondly, the patent system today has been perverted by corporations like MS. It is not as intended by the US Constitution.

[willdryden]

Ther patent system IS broken

Patents were set up for hardware and hardware innovations. Software is "intellectual property" and should be covered by copyrights not patents.

[INtheZONE71]

Can someone tell me how to get Linux 4 free,? and whats so great about it?